Blog

  • Lily Allen Says She’s ‘Really Not in a Good Place’ and That She’s Been ‘Spiraling and Spiraling’

    Lily Allen Says She’s ‘Really Not in a Good Place’ and That She’s Been ‘Spiraling and Spiraling’

    Lily Allen Says She’s ‘Really Not in a Good Place’ and That She’s Been ‘Spiraling and Spiraling’

    Becca Longmire

    January 9, 2025 at 2:43 PM

    Lily Allen is planning to take a break amid her ongoing mental health struggles.

    On the Thursday, Jan. 9 episode of her BBC podcast Miss Me? with co-host Miquita Oliver, Allen, 39, admitted she’s “finding it really hard to be interested in anything” at the moment while discussing the fact she hadn’t seen Sunday’s 2025 Golden Globes.

    “I’m just so… I’m really not in a good place,” the “Not Fair” singer told Oliver.

    She continued, “I know I’ve been talking about it for months, but I’ve been spiraling and spiraling and spiraling and it’s got out of control.”

    “I tried, I mean, I came to the Christmas lunch, the Miss Me? Christmas lunch, and I had a panic attack and had to go home. I went to see something at the theater the other night with my [friends] Carlo and Claire, and I had to leave at halftime,” Allen shared.

    Related: Lily Allen Says She Sometimes Feels ‘Ashamed’ of Not Having Academic Qualifications

    The mother of two — who married husband David Harbour, 49, in 2020 — continued, “I just can’t concentrate on anything except the pain that I’m going through.”

    “It’s really, really hard,” she added, confirming she was going to be taking a bit of a break.

    “I’m going away next week. You’re not gonna hear me for a few weeks, listeners,” Allen said, denying “vicious rumors” claiming she’d relapsed and was going to rehab, clearly getting emotional on the show.

    Allen’s reps didn’t immediately respond when contacted by PEOPLE.

    The musician, who has been sober for five years, has spoken openly about being free from drugs and alcohol.

    The daughter of actor and comedian, Keith Allen, told the U.K. newspaper The Times in a November interview, “I think that addiction runs deep in my family, so self-medicating was going to be on the cards. For me, it didn’t really feel like an ‘if,’ it was a ‘when.’ “

    “The journey of sobriety isn’t singular, and it isn’t linear. So if sharing my own experiences and struggles helps even just one person process what they’re going through, then it’s all worth it,” the star, who is an ambassador for the British addiction charity Forward Trust, told the outlet.

    Allen has also been open about her mental health struggles on her podcast, sharing on the Dec. 16 episode that she’s been having difficulty eating for the past three years, which she’d kept hidden from her therapist.

    “I’ve been going through a tough time over the last few months and my eating has become a real issue,” she said on the show.

    Related: Lily Allen Says She Makes ‘More Money’ from Selling Feet Photos Than ‘Having Nearly 8 Million Listeners on Spotify’

    Allen, who previously said she suffered from bulimia in 2011, said on the Dec. 16 podcast episode that she didn’t necessarily lie in therapy, but she’d been unintentionally leaving aspects of her life out during her sessions.

    “It’s just because it hasn’t seemed at the top of the list of the important things that I need to talk about,” she said, adding elsewhere on the podcast, “I’m really not in a great place mentally at the moment.”

    Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

    If you or someone you know is struggling with an eating disorder, please go to NationalEatingDisorders.org.

    If you or someone you know needs mental health help, text “STRENGTH” to the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 to be connected to a certified crisis counselor.

    Read the original article on People

  • Cillian Murphy Won’t Appear In 28 Years Later But May Return In Future Sequels

    Cillian Murphy Won’t Appear In 28 Years Later But May Return In Future Sequels

    Squid Game Season 2 Ending’s Major Death Is More Tragic With This New Detail Revealed By Star This article covers a developing story. Continue to check back with us as we will be adding more information as it becomes available.

    Cillian Murphy won’t appear in 28 Years Later, but may return in future sequels.

    In a new interview with Empire, producer Andrew Macdonald confirmed that Cillian Murphy doesn’t actually appear in 28 Years Later, though he may return for future sequels. However, Murphy is involved as an executive producer. Read Macdonald’s full comments below:

    [On] this, we wanted him to be involved and he wanted to be involved. He is not in the first film, but I’m hoping there will be some Jim somewhere along the line. He’s involved at the moment as an executive producer and I would hope we can work with him in some way in the future in the trilogy.

    More to come…

    Source: Empire

    Your changes have been saved

    Email is sent

    Email has already been sent

    My List My Favorite Movies My Watchlist

    Success!

    28 Years Later Not Rated Horror

    28 Years Later follows a group of survivors living on an isolated island nearly three decades after the rage virus outbreak. Venturing into the quarantine zone of the mainland, they uncover dangerous secrets and transformations among both the infected and other surviving factions.

    Release Date June 20, 2025 Main Genre Horror Franchise(s) 28 Days Later Cast Jodie Comer , Aaron Taylor-Johnson , Jack O’Connell , Alfie Williams , Ralph Fiennes , Joe Blakemore , Celi Crossland , Geoffrey Newland , Erin Kellyman , Chi Lewis-Parry , Nathan Hall , Angus Neill , Edvin Ryding , Cillian Murphy Director Danny Boyle Producers Andrew Macdonald , Cillian Murphy Writers Danny Boyle , Alex Garland Prequel(s) 28 Days Later, 28 Weeks Later Expand

  • Otto Schenk, Opera Director and Bulwark of Tradition, Dies at 94

    Otto Schenk, Opera Director and Bulwark of Tradition, Dies at 94

    A prominent practitioner of the historically grand productions that were once fashionable at the Met, he was especially well known for his stagings of Wagner.

    Otto Schenk, the prolific Austrian director whose lavishly traditional productions for the Metropolitan Opera and the Vienna State Opera thrilled generations of music lovers, died on Thursday at his home on Lake Irrsee in Austria. He was 94.

    His death was announced by his son, the conductor Konstantin Schenk.

    In a statement on its website, the Vienna State Opera’s general director, Bogdan Roscic, said Mr. Schenk “was able to draw on the intellectual and artistic wealth of the entire history of theater and communicate it brilliantly to a wide audience.”

    In Austria, Mr. Schenk’s renown as an actor, particularly as a comedic performer, arguably eclipsed his reputation as a director. But his international reputation rested largely on the operas he produced in a career that spanned almost six decades.

    In the United States, his opulent stagings of Richard Wagner’s operas from the late 1970s to the early ’90s garnered him lasting recognition. Many, including “Parsifal,” “Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg,” “Tannhäuser” and, perhaps most famously, the four-part operatic cycle “Der Ring des Nibelungen,” are available on home video.

    Along with the Italian director Franco Zeffirelli, Mr. Schenk was one of the most prominent practitioners of the historically grand productions that were fashionable at the Met under the long tenures of the general managers Rudolph Bing and Joseph Volpe. In Europe, he remained popular as a bulwark of tradition against stage directors — including many of his own generation — who brought modern and avant-garde sensibilities to theater and opera.

    When Peter Gelb succeeded Mr. Volpe at the Met in 2006, he recruited a new crop of directors to bring more contemporary ideas to the house. Revivals of Mr. Schenk’s 16 productions for the Met — a record for a director — became increasingly infrequent.

    In 2014, during a revival of Mr. Schenk’s 40-year-old production of Richard Strauss’s “Arabella,” a headline in Vanity Fair urged readers, “See Otto Schenk’s Masterpieces at the Met Opera While You Still Can.” The same year, The New York Times reviewed several of the director’s still-popular productions at the Vienna State Opera. “Mr. Schenk, who seems to be losing his place at the Met,” the critic James R. Oestreich wrote, “evidently retains his grip at home.”

    This renewed appreciation for Mr. Schenk seemed inseparable from the backlash against the Met’s 2012 “Ring” cycle, a tech-heavy staging by Robert Lepage. That production replaced Mr. Schenk’s cycle, which Anthony Tommasini, The New York Times’s chief classical music critic, called “a lushly romantic and reverentially traditional staging.”

    Reviewing the Lepage cycle for The New Yorker, Alex Ross wrote, “Pound for pound, ton for ton, it is the most witless and wasteful production in modern operatic history.”

    How The Times decides who gets an obituary. There is no formula, scoring system or checklist in determining the news value of a life. We investigate, research and ask around before settling on our subjects. If you know of someone who might be a candidate for a Times obituary, please suggest it here.

    Learn more about our process.

    Mr. Schenk’s “Ring” was both critically lauded and an audience favorite — from 1986, when the Met inaugurated the cycle with “Die Walküre,” the second opera in the tetralogy, which was presented in full in the 1989-90 season. Over the next two decades, the Met revived it six times. All three cycles presented during the 2008-9 season were sold out.

    At the time Mr. Schenk was tapped to direct the “Ring,” it was common for leading opera companies, especially in Europe, to present Wagner’s works in updated or abstract stagings. Mr. Schenk, working closely with James Levine, the Met’s longtime music director, insisted on playing by the composer’s rules: He preserved the work’s mythic and primordial setting and presented the epic almost like a living picture book, while making the most of Romantic sets by the German stage designer Günther Schneider-Siemssen, a frequent collaborator.

    “In this era of daringly trendy reinterpretations of the ‘Ring,’ there ought to be room for a brilliantly untrendy one,” Donal Henahan wrote in a 1987 Times review of “Das Rheingold,” the first opera in the cycle. Reviewing the same production for The Times three years later, Allan Kozinn concluded, “Whether one agrees with this Urtext approach or thinks it is time to move on, one must grant that as naturalistic stagings go, the Met’s is a beauty.”

    While Mr. Schenk’s “Ring” had its share of detractors — Martin Bernheimer of The Los Angeles Times called it both reactionary and naïve — it was generally considered a triumph of traditional dramaturgy and stagecraft.

    In 1990, the production’s four installments were shown on public television in the United States. “That adds up to 17 hours of 19th-century opera in prime time,” The Times reported of the “staggering” effort, which required a television crew of 30 that worked for about a month at the opera house.

    The broadcast, which was later released on video, became a reference recording for a generation of Wagnerians. Many of the featured singers, including James Morris, Hildegard Behrens, Jessye Norman and Siegfried Jerusalem, became identified with their roles; Mr. Levine, the music director, was invited to lead the cycle at the renowned Wagner Festival in Bayreuth, Germany, between 1994 and 1998. And the video recording helped imprint Mr. Schenk’s grand tableaus in the minds of “Ring” lovers for decades to come.

    Otto Schenk was born on June 12, 1930, in Vienna. His father, Eugen, was a notary who had converted from Judaism to Roman Catholicism. His mother, Georgine, was a saleswoman and store manager at the Julius Meinl coffee company in Trieste, which was then part of the Austro-Hungarian empire. They met during World War I, when Eugen was stationed there.

    After the Anschluss in 1938, Eugen’s marriage to an Aryan woman protected him from deportation or worse, but he and his family faced discrimination. He was stripped of his job because of his Jewish origins, and young Otto was thrown out of a junior branch of the Hitler Youth.

    “Suddenly, we were a Jewish household,” Mr. Schenk recalled in a 2020 memoir. Experiencing and witnessing persecution intensified his interest in Jewish culture.

    “I became interested in the forbidden ‘Jewish music’ of Gustav Mahler, and Offenbach’s Barcarole became my anthem. Later, I began reading Heinrich Heine, Karl Kraus, Arthur Schnitzler, Franz Werfel, and Stefan Zweig, and I discovered the visual worlds of Max Liebermann and Marc Chagall,” he wrote.

    “Above all, however,” he continued, “it was Jewish humor that became the plaything of my youth and has remained a pillar of my work to this day.”

    After the war, Mr. Schenk spent two semesters at the University of Vienna studying law before switching to the prestigious Max Reinhardt Seminar to train as an actor. He graduated in 1951 and began acting and directing at several of the city’s smaller playhouses. He quickly worked his way up to the Burgtheater, Austria’s leading theater.

    Throughout a long acting career that also encompassed television and film — he lent his voice to the elderly widower Carl Fredricksen for the Austrian release of the 2009 Disney-Pixar animated feature “Up” — he always came back to the theater.

    During his most active years at the Met, Mr. Scheck between 1988 and 1997 also led the Theater in der Josefstadt, the Viennese playhouse where he had cut his teeth early in his directing career and where he had his longest association as an actor. He appeared in dozens of roles there starting in 1954, including Antonio Salieri in “Amadeus,” Bottom in “A Midsummer Night’s Dream,” Vladimir in “Waiting for Godot” and Volpone. His last performance there was as Firs, the senile servant in Anton Chekhov’s “The Cherry Orchard,” in 2021.

    In 1956, he married the actress Renée Michaelis, whom he met while studying at the Max Reinhardt Seminar. She died in 2022. In addition to their son, Konstantin, he is survived by grandchildren. His older sister, the athlete Bianca Schenk, died in 2000.

    Mr. Schenk’s career in opera began in 1957 with a production of Mozart’s “Die Zauberflöte” at the Salzburg State Theater. Five years later he won wide recognition directing Alban Berg’s unfinished “Lulu” at the Theater an der Wien, a production conducted by Karl Böhm and starring Evelyn Lear. It was the Austrian premiere of a work now considered one of the 20th century’s operatic masterpieces.

    In 1964, Mr. Schenk became a house director at the Vienna State Opera, where his “Lulu” was also performed starting in 1968. He was prolific, averaging a new production per year until the late 1980s.

    His bejeweled 1968 staging of Richard Strauss’s “Der Rosenkavalier” and his severe 1970 “Fidelio,” both of which were conducted by Leonard Bernstein at their premieres, are among his six productions still in the company’s repertoire. (In 2014, half a century after his debut there with Leos Janacek’s “Jenufa,” Mr. Schenk directed his final production there, of Janacek’s “The Cunning Little Vixen.”)

    Mr. Schenk’s international star rose rapidly. He furnished productions for La Scala in Milan, the Royal Opera House in London and Germany’s leading companies in Hamburg, Berlin and Munich. At the Salzburg Festival in Austria, he directed operas and plays as well as acting onstage. For many summers he appeared as the devil, a brief yet scene-stealing role, in Hugo von Hofmannsthal’s “Everyman,” a Salzburg Festival tradition.

    Mr. Schenk made his Met debut in 1968 with Puccini’s “Tosca,” at the instance of the production’s star, the Swedish dramatic soprano Birgit Nilsson. “Traditionalists must have been pleased,” said Harold C. Schonberg, the Times’s chief classical music critic. “It was a good, old-fashioned production, with solid and realistic sets, a general air of gloominess, handsomely costumed.” The production was a hit, and the company revived it eight times over the next decade.

    Mr. Schenk’s first Wagner outing at the Met came in 1978 with “Tannhäuser.” That production, which featured sets by Mr. Schneider-Siemssen, was last seen during the 2023-24 season and was as notable for its formidable cast as for the climate protest that erupted on opening night.

    After his “Ring,” Mr. Schenk returned to the Met for two additional Wagner operas, “Parsifal” in 1991 and “Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg” in 1993, setting a high bar for aesthetically heightened literalism on the opera stage. “Otto Schenk has again made a case for traditionally staged Wagner at the Met, following the composer’s detailed direction,” the Times’s Edward Rothstein wrote of the “Meistersinger” premiere.

    When Mr. Schenk directed Donizetti’s “Don Pasquale” in 2006 as a vehicle for Anna Netrebko, the Russian star soprano, he announced that it would be his final Met production.

    Mr. Schenk defended his unwaveringly traditional approach to opera. “The rendezvous between old works and the present day is what’s exciting,” he said in an interview with the Austrian broadcaster ORF that aired for the 150th anniversary of the Vienna State Opera in 2019. “But if you stick the contemporary on top of old works it doesn’t make the whole thing modern. The text of ‘Lohengrin’ still sounds old-fashioned, even if the performer sings it while wearing a modern costume.”

  • ‘American Primeval’ Review: Hopeless on the Range

    ‘American Primeval’ Review: Hopeless on the Range

    Taylor Kitsch and Betty Gilpin star in a Netflix mini-series about the brutal, brutal West.

    In the catalog of the modern western, a lot of space is given to stories focused on what is assumed to have been the sheer miserableness of life on the frontier. Viscous carpets of mud. Frigid snowscapes. Scalpings. Rapes. The sibilant impact of arrows puncturing flesh.

    The eye-catching Netflix mini-series “American Primeval” (premiering Thursday) contains all of those in its six episodes, and more horrors besides: marauding wolves gnawing through cabin walls; a whipping by a sadistic militiaman; encounters with crazed and arrogant Frenchmen. It has a particular fetish for bloody animal carcasses, which are hung, skinned, drained and boiled with regularity. The odors are unimaginable.

    Mark L. Smith, who created and wrote “American Primeval,” has an affinity for the western as a bad dream; he and Alejandro G. Iñárritu wrote the revenge saga “The Revenant,” which revolved around a mauling by a grizzly bear. It’s as if Smith’s fascination with the endurance shown by those who took on the Old West leads him to create endurance tests for his audiences.

    Like “The Revenant,” “American Primeval” is loosely based on actual events, in this case the Utah War of 1857-58, when settlers belonging to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints formed militias and took up arms, gingerly, against the United States. Historical figures like the frontier entrepreneur Jim Bridger (Shea Whigham), who was also a prominent character in “The Revenant,” and the Latter-day Saints leader Brigham Young (Kim Coates) have large roles.

    It’s a period when settlers, displaced tribes and the United States Army all skirmished for land and authority in the recently established Utah Territory. And Smith wants to use it as a stage for something sprawling and meaningful — the latest pronouncement on how savage the supposedly civilized become when the chips are down. An Army captain played by Lucas Neff supplies the mandatory poetic narration: “I have come to believe that these lands possess forces that we civilized are not able to defend against.”

    What you need to make a revisionist-epic western work, though, is some real poetry — at least a hint of the kind of vision that informed “The Searchers” or “The Return of a Man Called Horse” or “McCabe and Mrs. Miller,” works that “American Primeval” apes but can’t echo.

    The director Peter Berg manages the gunfights and trail rides proficiently, and the cinematographer Jacques Jouffret (“Into the Wild”) provides a washed-out, blue-gray look that is handsome if not particularly distinctive for this kind of story. The aerial shots of wintry mountain vistas are monotonous yet unfailingly pleasing.

    But after some vivid early scenes when a mother and son, Sara and Devin Rowell (Betty Gilpin and Preston Mota), ride into the harrowing squalor of Bridger’s outpost seeking a guide to take them farther west, “American Primeval” is mostly dead on the page. There’s not enough excitement in the ideas, and there’s not enough thought in the storytelling.

    What’s left is the sometimes orgiastic brutality — no different from the violence in the kind of low-rent entertainment “American Primeval” wants to separate itself from — and the manifold formulas of the western. With the exception of Whigham’s puckish, entertaining Bridger, the trappers, soldiers, bounty hunters and militiamen feel like extras from one Sam Peckinpah film or another. The Shoshone and Paiute characters, meanwhile, are solemnly noble or dangerously impassioned but invariably humorless.

    The clichés compound as the Rowells head into the mountains with a reluctant guide, Isaac Reed (Taylor Kitsch, who starred in Berg’s wonderful series “Friday Night Lights”), and a runaway Native American girl, Two Moons (Shawnee Pourier, who is the show’s most expressive performer even though her character is mute).

    This bunch is carrying a lot more baggage than just blankets and hardtack, and its weight falls on the weary viewer. Sara, in particular, has issues that have followed her west from Pennsylvania and put her and Devin in constant danger. Unfortunately for Gilpin, the script works this out in ways that make Sara seem less like an imperiled 19th-century woman on the run than an exasperating and dangerously clueless Karen.

    Kitsch’s skill at playing bottled-up anguish and ardor is what his role should call for, but Isaac is a strong-and-silent caricature, too hollow to give Kitsch very much to communicate. It doesn’t help that the story is overstuffed and overcomplicated, circling back and forth from the fugitives’ flight to the jockeyings of the settlers and the Army to the plight of the Shoshone. (A clearer understanding of the geography, and a fuller explanation of the historical context, would help, but neither is provided.)

    A tighter focus on either the relationship between Sara and Isaac or on the Utah War might have allowed for a more coherent emotional and thematic arc, though at half the length. As it is, Smith juices the story in the later episodes by going weird (those Grand Guignol Frenchmen) and by breaking with the historical record in ways that may bemuse the average viewer but will likely displease any Latter-day Saints who have made it that far.

  • ‘Quiet on Set’ producer tackles Diddy abuse allegations in new docuseries: See the trailer

    ‘Quiet on Set’ producer tackles Diddy abuse allegations in new docuseries: See the trailer

    In a press conference, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York revealed shocking allegations against Sean “Diddy” Combs.

    As Sean “Diddy” Combs’ legal fate hangs in the balance, several of his accusers are coming forward in a new docuseries to further detail his alleged abuses.

    Investigation Discovery released a trailer for its upcoming docuseries on the embattled music mogul, “The Fall of Diddy,” on Thursday. The four-part series, helmed by “Quiet on Set” producer Maxine Productions and Rolling Stone Films, will feature “exclusive, never-before-heard accounts and never-before-seen archival footage” illuminating the “harrowing allegations of violent behavior and illegal activity” recently leveled against Combs.

    “Spanning Combs’ decades-long impact on music and popular culture, from his early days as a talented creative to his 2024 arrest, the docuseries uncovers the insidious and terrifying allegations of sexual assault, abusive behavior, violence and other disturbing claims that lay beneath his success,” Investigation Discovery said in a press release.

    Combs, who was arrested in September on charges of racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution, remains in custody at the Special Housing Unit in Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center. A trial for the Grammy-winning rapper, who’s denied all accusations against him, is set to commence on May 5.

    Combs’ alleged misconduct came under scrutiny in November 2023 when ex-girlfriend and “Me & U” singer Casandra “Cassie” Ventura accused Combs of rape, sex trafficking and physical abuse in a lawsuit that was promptly settled one day after Ventura filed. The lawsuit spurred multiple civil suits alleging rape and sexual assault by the hip-hop mogul, as well as pair of federal raids.

    The docuseries will include interviews with more than 30 Combs’ associates, ranging from former friends and colleagues to individuals who worked directly for Combs, such as former Danity Kane member D. Woods.

    Thalia Graves and Rodney “Lil Rod” Jones Jr., both of whom have sued Combs for alleged sexual assault, appear in Thursday’s trailer. Graves, who claims Combs and his bodyguard “viciously raped her” in 2001, says in the clip: “I always believed that I was the only victim.”

    Jones, who worked as a producer on Combs’ “The Love Album: Off the Grid,” alleged in his February 2024 lawsuit that the rapper “forcibly touched” him and accused Combs and his associates of participating in “a sex-trafficking venture.”

    “There’s a lot of people like Puffy in the music business,” Jones says in the trailer. “Exposing Puffy means exposing them.”

    The ID series is not the only TV exposé on Combs’ alleged abuses. Streaming service Peacock will be releasing a documentary special, “Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy,” on Tuesday.

    “The Fall of Diddy” will premiere in two parts on Jan. 27 and Jan. 28 at 9 p.m. ET on Investigation Discovery. Episodes will also be available to stream on Max.

  • ‘American Primeval’ review: Can Netflix’s grimy Western mini-series best ‘Yellowstone’?

    ‘American Primeval’ review: Can Netflix’s grimy Western mini-series best ‘Yellowstone’?

    Preston Mota and Betty Gilpin in “American Primeval.” Credit: Justin Lubin / Netflix

    American Primeval is decently entertaining as an action-drama, though it’s quite fascinating in concept. The Netflix mini-series, created by Mark L. Smith and directed by Peter Berg, features an accomplished ensemble playing mostly familiar archetypes during a pre-Civil War struggle for the American West. However, it saps anything resembling wistfulness from its Hollywood Western roots, complicating its chances of cornering the post-Yellowstone market (alongside the latter’s many spin-offs). What’s left is the husk of a beloved genre, told in stark, chaotic hues seldom seen on-screen.

    The show’s numerous subplots are connected by grisly happenstance, albeit not much else. It’s a violent saga, even though its violence quickly plateaus. This goes for both its physical brutality, as well as the many cruel ideologies in its crosshairs, from white supremacy and religious fundamentalism to a general penchant for war. But that these are so nakedly on display, in a show this unapologetically grim, is a welcome surprise, from a setting and storytelling mode so otherwise steeped in nostalgia. Despite its threads unraveling in haphazard ways, the series is never boring, and never wanting for a good performance.

    The story of American Primeval, which takes place in the winter of 1857, is based on real locations and events, albeit with necessary dramatizations. With a bounty on her head for an alleged murder, well-to-do mother Sara Rowell (Betty Gilpin) absconds from Philadelphia with her pre-teen son Devin (Preston Mota) to meet up with her husband out west. But upon arriving at Fort Bridger — a real fur trading outpost in Wyoming along the Oregon Trail — she learns that her guide has already left, leading her to desperately search for safe passage wherever she can find it.

    The fort is not far from volatile conflicts between numerous factions. The Shoshone Tribe is one of several who have been driven from their native land by constant war. A ruthless Mormon militia patrols the territories near Utah, at the behest of the expansionist, extremist preacher Governor Brigham Young (a terrifying Kim Coates). Meanwhile, the conscientious U.S. Army Captain Edmund Dellinger (Lucas Neff) tries to keep the peace, but he’s growing increasingly cynical about the possibility of coexistence (as we’re frequently reminded, through his numerous diary entries narrated in voiceover).

    The aforementioned groups only account for about half the series’ characters, all of whom are set up bit-by-bit through very direct exposition. Additionally, there’s the lone gunman from whom Sara seeks help, the lonely and brooding Isaac (Taylor Kitsch), who shares an intimate history with the Shoshone. There are the bounty hunters on her trail, led by Virgil Cutter (Jai Courtney), a leader whose heartlessness clashes with his more empathetic protégé Lucas (Andrew P. Logan).

    There are the various militiamen and Mormon leaders, and there are also Mormon civilians just trying to find their way unscathed. Some of the latter end up inadvertently attacked when traveling with a larger caravan, including newlywed Abish Pratt (Saura Lightfoot-Leon) and her husband Jacob (Dane DeHaan), whose increasingly bloody and disheveled appearance each episode is as ludicrously funny as Homer Simpson hitting infinite rocks and tree branches. And of course, there’s Jim Bridger himself, the founder of the aforementioned fort, played with smarm and panache by the ever-delightful Shea Whigham.

    The show also features a number of Native characters who, although they’re seldom allowed to leave the strict confines of plot function — American Primeval is an anti-Western in every way but this — still displays a beating humanity and ethos. There’s the young, nonverbal Shoshone girl Two Moons (Shawnee Pourier), a runaway who hitches a ride with Sara and Devin, and there’s also rogue Shoshone warrior Red Feather (Derek Hinkey), who forms his own tribe intent on trading blood for blood. If the latter sounds a whole lot like a central character in Kevin Costner’s Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 1, his appearance isn’t the only time you’ll be making that comparison.

    If anything, the show plays like a morbid and cynical answer to Horizon, the film series that Costner left Yellowstone in order to make, and one that wrestles with the violence inherent to America’s founding myths while still morosely holding on to a folkloric image of the nation’s past. American Primeval has less trouble removing its rose-tinted glasses, even going as far as to deploy rearrangements of Woody Guthrie’s famous folk song “This Land Is Your Land” to deeply ironic effect. However, it struggles just as much as Costner’s film when it comes to switching between its numerous characters.

    The show’s structure and plot might mirror Costner’s Western epic, but its closest aesthetic cousins are actually Alejandro González Iñárritu’s own violent winter Western The Revenant (which Mark L. Smith also notably penned) and, in terms of frenetic editing, the Star Wars films of J.J. Abrams. That second comparison is, for the most part, complimentary. American Primeval charges forth with reckless abandon, leaving little room to consider the actual time and space between people spread across different parts of the landscape. That’s not always a good thing, but it means each new plot development is always just around the corner, with characters always ready to stumble into each other’s stories.

    On the other hand, the lack of actual travel time or any sort of downtime for the characters, even across six hours, leaves little room for them to unravel and develop. Gilpin and Kitsch, for instance, are suitably austere, resulting in Jane Austen-esque romantic tensions, but who they are as people is established from minute one, and remains frozen in stasis throughout the story. The same is true for most characters except DeHaan’s, who has the advantage of being changed by physical injury. No one is really affected or impacted, in human ways, by the show’s many goings-on.

    That said, those goings on are usually fun to watch, from gritty firefights in unbroken takes to vicious hand-to-hand combat in close quarters. Emmanuel Lubezki’s Oscar-winning cinematography for The Revenant was clearly the prototype here, with short-lensed close-ups skewing space and enhancing the impact of everything from blood to spittle, all covered in snow. The first episode is wonderfully chaotic, with its quick cuts and askew Dutch angles throwing everything off-balance as civilians are engulfed by attacks. Unfortunately, this visual approach ends up somewhat indiscriminate across the series, even during mundane conversations.

    The show’s washed-out palette and permeating muck and grime paint America’s infancy as a time of petty squabble without absolution — a counter-narrative to most of the country’s mythology about itself. However, the show also builds in a kind of narrative backstop to prevent it from falling into total despair: the American dream is still, in a sense, alive, but it’s relegated to the four walls of Fort Bridger.

    The fort, which appears early on in the series and becomes a frequent respite from the action, very much exists in the vein of cinema’s lawless Old West, with its saloons, and shootings, and hangings. But it’s also representative of an American ideal. It’s the only place in the show where characters from all walks of life, and all backgrounds (white, Native, or otherwise) can congregate, take refuge from religious extremism, and have an actual shot at living.

    It’s also the center of a beautifully haunting climax that revels in the slow demise of said ideals, which makes for a pitch-perfect conclusion to the show — or would have, had the series chosen to end on this symbolic note. Instead, it returns to one of its many ongoing narratives so that Person A can wander into Story B and conclude Subplot C, most of which jog in place for multiple episodes.

    While American Primeval occasionally wields its metaphors with skill, it is, for the most part, a banal and obvious show about the trickle-down effects of the past. For instance, Courtney’s Cutter, when addressing Sara, all but turns to the camera in order to deliver the line, “Our current circumstances are a reflection of our past decisions.” The problem with this sort of delivery — other than its thuddingly literal nature — is that this theme and every other one is established in the first episode and never transforms dramatically.

    American Primeval may be forward-thinking in its premise, with its apparent deconstruction of national history and self-image. However, its execution ends up with little to say, beyond the broad strokes of people’s selfishness causing pain and suffering. You learn this from the get-go, so you know exactly the kind of show you’re getting into from there on out, but there’s little left to learn. So, even its subversions of traditional Hollywood imagery and American mythmaking feel oddly familiar and comfortable by the end.

  • Elmo tells all: ‘Sesame Street’ 55th season features SZA, Chris Stapleton, Reneé Rapp and more

    Elmo tells all: ‘Sesame Street’ 55th season features SZA, Chris Stapleton, Reneé Rapp and more

    Elmo tells all: ‘Sesame Street’ 55th season features SZA, Chris Stapleton, Reneé Rapp and more

    MARIA SHERMAN

    January 9, 2025 at 1:31 PM

    1 / 4

    Music-Sesame Street

    This image released by Sesame Workshop shows singer SZA, left, with muppet character Oscar the Grouch on the set of “Sesame Street.” (Richard Termine/Sesame Workshop via AP)

    ASSOCIATED PRESS

    NEW YORK (AP) — Appearing on “Sesame Street”? That’s the best idea.

    The 55th season of the acclaimed family program features a star-studded lineup of musicians that would be the envy of any summer festival: SZA, Chris Stapleton, Noah Kahan, Reneé Rapp and Samara Joy.

    The upcoming season will focus on lessons in emotional well-being. It debuts Jan. 16 on MAX with new episodes releasing every Thursday. “Sesame Street” will also be available on PBS stations and to stream on PBS Kids in the fall.

    No one is more excited than Elmo himself.

    “There’s a lot to learn from music — yeah, timing and harmonies and melody and different styles and different cultures,” the 3 1/2-year-old monster told The Associated Press. “It’s really cool! We’ve got a lot of wonderful people come and do some music with us on ‘Sesame Street,’ like Miss Reneé Rapp and SZA! Chris Stapleton, Noah Kahan, Samara Joy — lots of great people!”

    Songs double as life lessons on “Sesame Street,” from an alt-R&B-pop track about gratitude with SZA to an acoustic number about feelings with Rapp.

    “SZA is really cool — really talented. And ‘gratitude’ was a new word for Elmo, too. So, Elmo learned all about gratitude with SZA,” he said.

    “Elmo was feeling really, really happy after his playdate with Miss Reneé. It was a really beautiful song. She’s got a great voice and Elmo hopes she comes back soon.”

    As for the secret to a great “Sesame Street” song? According to Tony – and Grammy-winning composer, producer and “Sesame Street” music director Bill Sherman, its “earworms on earworms.”

    “If the verse is an earworm, so is the chorus. Mostly in pop music, the chorus is the earworm, and the verses are just a bunch of jumble.” The difference, he explains, is that pop songs are about three and a half minutes long. Children’s music is about a minute and a half. “You only have a very finite amount of time to do what you got to do.”

    Usually, writers on the show provide Sherman and his team of songwriters with a script and lyrics detailing the lesson of each episode, as well as the name of the musical guest. Then they get to work, composing music true to the genre and spirit of each artist.

    Those musical guests take different levels of involvement, but the result is always awe-inspiring.

    Other highlights from this season include Kahan performing a foot-stomping folk song about music and feelings, Joy using jazz improvisation to teach a lesson in taking turns and a country ode to music and friends courtesy of Stapleton.

    “Chris Stapleton really wanted to write his own song,” says Sherman, and so the pair hopped on a Zoom and wrote a song together, Stapleton with his guitar in tow, ideas flowing. “It was really one of the most surreal two-hour Zooms that I really ever had in my life.”

    Joy took a different approach. “Samara Joy insisted on singing live,” says Sherman. “It very rarely happens on ‘Sesame Street.’ I can only count, like, a few times. So, there was like Stevie Wonder back in the day, which is a classic. And there’s like Billy Joel, there’s John Legend, there’s a couple people that actually sing live. But Samara insisted on it.”

    Her reasoning was simple. “She said, ‘Well, this whole episode is about improvisation and thinking on your toes. And so, if it’s prerecorded, that’s the opposite of what we’re trying to teach.’”

    If there is a theme that connects all these performances to one another, it’s a spirit of connection. At least, that’s Elmo’s theory: “Elmo thinks that music brings people together, you know? And some people who like some things and some people who like other things can kind of come together because they like the same kind of music. And that’s kind of cool!”

    “Sesame Street,” designed by education professionals and child psychologists, is shown in more than 150 countries, has won over 200 Emmys, 11 Grammys, two Peabody Awards and received a Kennedy Center Honor for lifetime artistic achievement, the first time a television program got the award.

    There’ve been no shortage of great musical guests across the show’s five decade run. So, who would they like to see pay a visit in the future? “Miss Taylor Swift! Maybe she could revisit her ‘Red’ era?” chimes in Elmo. That’s his favorite of her albums.

    “But also, Elmo would love to sing with Miss Beyoncé. Destiny’s Child was on ‘Sesame Street,’ so Elmo would love to have her back.”

  • Integrity on the Rocks: The Crisis Facing Scientific Research and Its Future

    Integrity on the Rocks: The Crisis Facing Scientific Research and Its Future

    The scientific community is currently navigating through tumultuous waters—one marked by a credibility crisis that threatens the very foundation of research integrity. Alarm bells are ringing, and insights from recent studies are shining a harsh spotlight on the quality of scientific publications. Take Maria Ángeles Oviedo-García, PhD, from the University of Seville, whose findings have laid bare growing concerns about the integrity of what is currently being published. It’s not just her voice in isolation; respected outlets like the journal Science and the savvy blog Retraction Watch echo these worries, illustrating a troubling trend that can’t be ignored.,The problems are glaringly evident. According to a report featured in Science, a significant inflow of subpar submissions—particularly contrived letters and comments spawned by artificial intelligence—has inundated journals. In an eye-opening announcement, Daniel Prevedello, MD, editor in chief of Neurosurgical Review, stated that his journal would temporarily halt the acceptance of these low-quality submissions, reflecting a desperate measure to uphold standards in a swirling sea of mediocrity. Prevedello’s decision isn’t an outlier; it’s indicative of a broader pattern where many journals are grappling with similar issues.,Consider the Oral Oncology Reports (Elsevier), where a staggering 70% of content was composed of these comments. In the International Journal of Surgery Open, this figure dropped to nearly half. Neurosurgical Review also revealed that letters, comments, and editorials constituted a whopping 58% of its total content from January to October 2024—an unthinkable rise from just 9% the previous year. This trend smacks of a fundamental shift in the reputation game, where authors inflate their publication lists by cranking out hastily-produced, low-quality contributions that ominously bypass rigorous peer review.,This phenomenon does nothing for the advancement of knowledge—yet it seems publishers are reaping the rewards. Many journals impose fees for publishing comments, fueling a system that prioritizes profit over substance. For research institutions and universities, this might initially seem beneficial; more publications can enhance their reputations. But at what cost? Oviedo-García cautions, “Some other researchers will probably base their future research on these fake reports, which is frightening, especially when it comes to health and medicine.”,Delving deeper, Oviedo-García’s analysis in Scientometrics revealed an unsettling pattern in peer reviews. A whopping 263 evaluations from 37 journals showcased a bizarre uniformity—reviewers often recycled phrases without any regard for content, leading to superficial evaluations. Imagine a reviewer using the same wording in 52 different reviews. It’s no wonder that the integrity of scientific literature is under siege; such practices only serve to undermine the very essence of peer review.,As if this wasn’t alarming enough, the entry of artificial intelligence into the research ecosystem adds another layer of complexity. AI systems are more than just data crunchers; they are now being utilized to generate entire articles at a staggering pace. This was underscored at international conferences, where experts suggested that AI could churn out papers in mere weeks and complete dissertations in under a year. This rapid-fire content generation raises crucial questions—how can we trust the quality of research if the process itself is becoming automated?,Moreover, researchers are sidestepping peer review altogether by publishing findings on readily accessible preprint servers. This trend compounds the issue further, as many articles end up with bloated authorship lists—hundreds of names attached, often with ambiguous contributions. It’s a publication arms race, and integrity is the first casualty.,For those entrenched in academia, this ongoing crisis has sparked a profound sense of concern. Ulrich Dirnagl, MD, PhD, from Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, articulated the reality succinctly: “The scientific papers have become so complex that two or three experts often cannot thoroughly assess everything presented.” The peer review process has stretched thin, often taking unpaid and anonymous reviewers several days to sift through content.,What does it all mean for the future? It recalls that old Russian proverb—“Trust, but verify.” As we stand at this crossroads, the call for vigilance has never been clearer. The scientific community must rally to reclaim its standards, or we risk consigning valuable research to the realm of the inconsequential. The stakes are high, and the time for action is now.

  • Alec Baldwin sues prosecutors in Rust trial, alleging civil rights violations

    Alec Baldwin sues prosecutors in Rust trial, alleging civil rights violations

    Actor has filed civil lawsuit claiming prosecutors targeted him for professional or political gain, and intentionally concealed evidence that vindicated him

    Actor Alec Baldwin has filed a civil lawsuit for malicious prosecution and civil rights violations against the prosecutors in his trial over the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the western movie Rust.

    The lawsuit was filed Thursday at state district court in Santa Fe, where a judge in July dismissed a charge of involuntary manslaughter against Baldwin in the death of Hutchins, who was killed in 2021.

    Defendants named in the lawsuit include special prosecutor Kari Morrissey and Santa Fe district attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies, along with three investigators from the Santa Fe County sheriff’s office and the county board of commissioners.

    Baldwin alleges prosecutors targeted him for professional or political gain, intentionally concealing evidence that would have vindicated him and intentionally mishandling evidence.

    “Defendants, while acting under the color of law, conspired to procure a groundless indictment against Baldwin and to maliciously bring about or advance Baldwin’s trial and conviction, thus violating Baldwin’s constitutional rights by their improper use of the criminal process,” the lawsuit states.

    Baldwin also alleges defamation in the suit, over statements made by prosecutors to media that he says falsely implied he was responsible for Hutchins’ death.

    “Defendants sought at every turn to scapegoat Baldwin for the acts and omissions of others, regardless of the evidence or the law,” the lawsuit states, accusing Carmack-Altwies and Morrissey of manipulating evidence and eliciting false testimony.

    Baldwin is seeking unspecified damages.

    Hutchins died shortly after being wounded during a rehearsal in October 2021 at a film-set ranch on the outskirts of Santa Fe, New Mexico.

    Baldwin, the film’s lead actor and co-producer, was pointing a pistol at Hutchins when it discharged, killing Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza. Baldwin has said he pulled back the hammer – but not the trigger – and the revolver fired.

    Baldwin’s trial was upended by revelations that ammunition was brought into the Santa Fe County sheriff’s office in March by a man who said it could be related to Hutchins’ killing. Prosecutors said they deemed the ammo unrelated and unimportant, while Baldwin’s lawyers say investigators “buried” the evidence in a separate case folder and filed a successful motion to dismiss.

    Morrissey said she learned more than a year ago that Baldwin was considering a lawsuit.

    “In October 2023 the prosecution team became aware that Mr Baldwin intended to file a retaliatory civil lawsuit,” she told the media in a text message Thursday. “We look forward to our day in court.”

    Carmack-Altwies and the Santa Fe sheriff’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Baldwin’s lawsuit argues that prosecutors should not be afforded immunity in their official roles.

    Baldwin’s case was closed in December when prosecutors decided not to appeal against the court’s decision to dismiss the charge against him.

    Separately, the shooting led to an involuntary manslaughter conviction at trial last year against movie weapons supervisor Hannah Gutierrez-Reed. She is serving out a maximum sentence of 18 months at a state penitentiary.

    The tort claim by Baldwin also takes aim at a special prosecutor who initially oversaw the investigation, while seeking unspecified punitive damages, compensatory damages, attorneys’ fees and interest.

    It adds to a thicket of post-trial litigation, even as Baldwin has returned to comic appearances on Saturday Night Live with plans in the works for a family reality TV show with his wife, Hilaria, and their seven children.

    The parents and younger sister of Hutchins have sued Baldwin and other producers of Rust in New Mexico state court. A settlement has already been reached in a lawsuit by Hutchins’ widower and their son.

  • ’28 Years Later’ Producer Shares Disappointing Update About Cillian Murphy’s Role

    ’28 Years Later’ Producer Shares Disappointing Update About Cillian Murphy’s Role

    If you were super-pumped to see Cillian Murphy back as Jim in 28 Years Later, the forthcoming third film in the 28 Days Later franchise, and the first of a planned trilogy, it’s time to pump the brakes on your excitement. According to the film’s producer, Andrew Macdonald, the Oscar-winning actor will not be appearing in the movie. So for those hoping to find out what Murphy’s character Jim has been up to since the first film, we likely won’t get any answers in the first installment.

    Speaking with Empire, Macdonald, who produced both 28 Days Later and its follow-up, 28 Weeks Later, among several other projects with director Danny Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland, says Murphy’s involvement in 28 Years Later is only as an executive producer.

    “…[We] wanted him to be involved and he wanted to be involved,” Macdonald said. “He is not in the first film, but I’m hoping there will be some Jim somewhere along the line.”

    So for now at least, fans will have to wait to see if Murphy will make an appearance in either of the subsequent sequels. However, unless he has already filmed scenes for the second installment, Nia DaCosta’s 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, which has reportedly already wrapped production, then we’ll have to wait for the third film in the trilogy to find out what has become of Jim.

    Fans thought they’d already spotted Jim in the trailer for 28 Years Later, as an emaciated zombie rising up in a field. But that turned out not to be the case. The emaciated zombie in question is played by Angus Neill, not Murphy, and the infected individual is not Jim.

    ’28 Years Later’ Is an Enigma Right Now Close

    Very little is known about 28 Years Later at this point. It stars Aaron-Taylor Johnson, Jodie Comer, and Ralph Fiennes, the latter of whom shared some tantalizing details about the plot of the film in an interview with IndieWire:

    Britain is 28 years into this terrible plague of infected people who are violent, rabid humans with a few pockets of uninfected communities. And it centers on a young boy who wants to find a doctor to help his dying mother. He leads his mother through this beautiful northern English terrain. But of course, around them hiding in forests and hills and woods are the infected. But he finds a doctor who is a man we might think is going to be weird and odd, but actually is a force for good.

    Related What That Creepy Poem Meant in the ’28 Years Later’ Trailer

    Overlaid with images of chaos, the ’28 Years Later’ trailer’s military poem holds a level of irony as it evokes terror and anxiety.

    Posts

    Comer has also spoken publicly about the film, though she revealed little about the plot. Rather, the Killing Eve star stated that 28 Years Later will be thematically similar to the original movie, focusing more on human behavior than shock and gore.

    28 Years Later is slated to hit theaters on June 20, 2025. Its sequel, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, will be released on January 16, 2026. There is no release date currently set for the third installment.

    28 Years Later Not Rated Horror Release Date June 20, 2025 Director Danny Boyle Cast Aaron Taylor-Johnson , Jodie Comer , Cillian Murphy , Jack O’Connell , Ralph Fiennes