Category: Uncategorized

  • Review: ‘The Alto Knights’ struggles to earn a place in the pantheon of gangster cinema

    Review: ‘The Alto Knights’ struggles to earn a place in the pantheon of gangster cinema

    Named after a New York social club frequented in the 1950s by the Luciano and Genovese crime families, “The Alto Knights” hits theaters riding hard on the gimmick of casting Robert De Niro in two roles: mob boss Vito Genovese and his mafioso frenemy Frank Costello.

    No shade on De Niro — at 81, he’s still the capo di tutti capi (boss of all bosses)among his generation of actors. But seeing him act with himself feels like a stunt that has the undesirable effect of taking us out of the action and into something resembling a comic parody.

    How much better if, say, Al Pacino — De Niro’s scene partner in 1995’s “Heat” and 2019’s “The Irishman” — took one of the roles. As it is, “The Alto Knights” fails to achieve takeoff despite the efforts of Oscar-winning director Barry Levinson (“Rain Man,” “Bugsy”) and screenwriter Nicholas Pileggi, who scripted two Martin Scorsese classics, “Goodfellas” and “Casino.”

    “The Alto Knights” makes much of the fact that Vito and Frank were friends as boys, growing up on mean streets that prepped them to make their bones in the organization of Charles “Lucky” Luciano. Levinson uses black-and-white footage and still photography to give the past a documentary feel to reflect the life and times of the declining mob in its gory glory days.

    “The Alto Knights” begins in 1957, when Vito tags Vincent “the Chin” Gigante (“Shogun” dreamboat Cosmo Jarvis) to whack Frank. The attempt fails, which sends Frank running while he takes on the role of narrator, laboriously telling us how everything went down.

    The main action of the film is given over to two grandpas fighting for relevance in a world that’s passed them by. De Niro leans heavily into makeup and prosthetics to differentiate between the dueling goodfellas. His Vito, returned from exile in Sicily, is a hothead with a needling, Joe-Pesci-like whine. His Frank, who took over the family in Vito’s absence, has a longer nose, fancier duds and fake aura of respectability that irritates Vito to violent distraction.

    The bosses also have wives. Debra Messing (“Will & Grace”) excels as Frank’s Jewish spouse Bobbie, but Kathrine Narducci (“The Irishman”) ups the ante on attitude as Anna, Vito’s volatile, club-owning, barely better half.

    The operative phrase in “The Alto Knights” is a De Niro line from “Taxi Driver.” By that I mean, “You talking to me?” There’s way more “talk” than action as the film slogs through the decades. Levinson breaks up the verbal blather by including scenes such as the barber shop assassination of Costello’s buddy, Albert Anastasia (a terrific Michael Rispoli).

    Still, the film’s only reason for being is the sight of De Niro going mano a mano with De Niro. Vita and Frank have fun badgering each other in a candy store and Levinson includes a scene of Vito going ballistic watching Frank on TV as he testifies before a Senate subcommittee.

    And what revenge did Frank exact against Vito for trying to murder him? The film suggests that the 1957 police raid against a Vito-arranged mob summit meeting in upstate New York — an event said to mark the beginning of the end for the mafia — might have been Frank’s doing.

    Don’t look to “The Alto Knights” for answers. As the film drags to a climax, audiences are left with the sorry sight of Levinson, Pileggi and a double dose of De Niro struggling to meet and even surpass their well-earned place in the pantheon of gangster cinema. It’s a losing battle.

  • ‘Severance’ stars explain Season 2’s harrowing finale and the ‘love hexagon’

    ‘Severance’ stars explain Season 2’s harrowing finale and the ‘love hexagon’

    This article contains spoilers from the Season 2 finale of “Severance.”

    The second season of Apple TV+’s “Severance” concluded much like it started — with a harrowing sprint. And for innie Mark, it also ended with a crisis of conscience that led him to make a critical choice in the face of an uncertain future.

    Barring the ability to flood the brain with mind-warping flashbacks, here’s a reminder of where the season picked up: Mark (Adam Scott), Helly (Britt Lower), Irving (John Turturro) and Dylan (Zach Cherry) — the “severed” employees who’ve had a chip implanted in their brains that separates their work and personal lives, known as innies and outies — went to great lengths to have their chips overridden so they could briefly experience life as their outies. Season 2 opened back at Lumon, the eerie biotechnology company that pioneered the controversial “severance” procedure, with innie Mark racing through the stark white hallways in search of Ms. Casey (Dichen Lachman), the wellness director at the company, after discovering that she is actually Gemma, outie Mark’s wife. It set in motion a season where the characters tried to understand why their outies chose to be severed.

    The final moments of Season 2 were a nerve-racking bookend to that initial search.

    Innie Mark decides to move forward with the plan to rescue Gemma — schemed up by outie Mark with help from his sister Devon (Jen Tullock) and Ms. Cobel (Patricia Arquette), his scorned former boss. It requires him to complete the Cold Harbor file, the final step of Lumon’s shrouded ploy to create multiple innies of Gemma. Once the file is complete, innie Mark transitions into his outie after an elevator takes him beyond the severed floor, and launches on the quest to rescue Ms. Casey/Gemma before Lumon is finished with her. But in order for them to escape, Mark has to return to the severed floor, where his innie leads Ms. Casey/Gemma to the doors to the hallway. And instead of joining her on the other side, he walks back toward Helly, who is watching in the distance, as Gemma screams for Mark. Locking hands, Helly and Mark sprint down the hall toward the unknown as alarms blare, with the episode closing out on a freeze frame of their run as a red painted image.

    “That image, to me, was always there in my head of Mark in the hallway, looking between Gemma and Helly,” says executive producer Ben Stiller, who directed more than half of the series, including the Season 2 finale. “The setup of Helly and Mark’s relationship during the season, then, in Episode 7, the important [flashback] episode that Jessica [Lee Gagné] directed, was so important in creating this backstory for people to experience and to really have stakes in Gemma, more than just an idea of her. That really set up the stakes of this last moment where innie Mark has to make this choice.”

    Creator Dan Erickson said the team briefly considered choosing an earlier end point and having a shorter season because of delays compounded by the dual Hollywood strikes, “but] we quickly just realized that we felt this was the end of the season. It was what everything was building toward.”

    The Times spoke to Scott, Lower and Lachman on a video call, and Erickson and Stiller in separate calls, to discuss the tense cliffhanger, the classic film that inspired a key moment and hopes for Season 3, which Apple TV+ has not officially announced. This interview has been edited for clarity and length.

    You realize the finale will kill the internet, right? How many times have you watched it?

    Scott: I’ve probably seen it four or five times. I’ve seen different versions of it. We watched and gave notes. Ben did an incredible job. It’s a beast. It’s a big, big finale. It was a lot to get his arms around.

    Lachman: I think people will be pitching a throuple situation maybe, where they can all live together. I certainly think [fans are] going to be very upset, but only because they’re so torn. They’ve fallen so much in love for Helly R., who’s just captured people’s hearts, but so aware of Adam’s character being torn between thinking that his wife is gone, but ultimately she isn’t. It’s a real conundrum.

    Tell me your first reaction to seeing that innie Mark went back with Helly in the end.

    Lower: Originally, there was talk that it was going to end with just Mark in the hallway, not having made a decision. That’s my first recollection. It’s so complex. I’ll just add more shapes — I think it’s really like a love hexagon because you have to bring Ms. Casey into the picture too, right? When Dichen crosses that threshold, there’s ostensibly no more Ms. Casey. I can’t imagine she would come back for that consciousness. Plus, you have all of the 23 other consciousnesses that were on the severed floor that Dichen so beautifully lived out. The end of the series really becomes about all of those different consciousnesses having contrasting desires.

    Scott: That was thought of always as the end point for the season — is the big choice in the hallway — and it was a matter of figuring out how to get there. There was a general sense of the direction, but as far as the specific puzzle pieces to put into place, that was really figured out after. It just seemed like the logical place to go with innie Mark and outie Mark on this collision course all season. It starts out with their interests aligning and pretty soon their interests start to diverge. But as far as ending the season before he makes a choice, I’m so glad we didn’t end up doing that. I think that the season ends in the exact right place.

    Stiller: The first image for me that I always had in my head was him having to decide between the two, but as we discussed it more and knowing how the end of the first season played out, we wanted this finale to be different and not leave people with a cliffhanger just to leave them with a cliffhanger. As we talked about it with Dan, it made sense to us that innie Mark, especially after that conversation that he has in the beginning of the episode with outie Mark, would be really thinking about what was right for him. And so it evolved into the idea of what Dan wrote of them [innie Mark and Helly] running down the hallway. That imagery was so strong. The idea of the freeze frame on them at the end: OK, we’re together. But they’re stuck in this really hellish reality. That imagery to me was like, OK, this is something I could see as being the end of the season that would be leading you somewhere else that you don’t know where it’s going, but it’s not necessarily a cliffhanger. That felt different and hopefully, in a way, would be more interesting and satisfying for the audience.

    What stands out from the shooting of this big moment that ends the season? Britt, the way Helly looks back at Gemma was powerful.

    Lower: Helly R. seeing Gemma, Britt seeing Dichen’s performance on the other side of the door, was really affecting. That last moment where she’s seeing this heartbreaking thing happening across the hallway, my eyes were just drawn to Dichen. That was just something that happened on the day. I remember just being like, “I can’t take my eyes off her, even if I’m being pulled away.” There’s a connection there. There’s this moment where I think Helly R. is seeing an outie, having empathy for an outie, maybe for the first time, and seeing this other woman who loves the outie version of the same person that she loves on the inside. That has an effect, even as they’re running away like wild horses. That lingering image, that heartbreaking image stays with her as they’re both, like, “What are we doing? What’s next?” And yet she’s free.

    Lachman: On my side, there was a lot of technical things happening on that day because Ms. Casey is transitioning. By the time we got to the other side of the door, what was happening inside me with the frustration and stuff, it really helped my physicality to get into that emotional space. Ben was so gracious. And Adam and Britt being there for me and giving me the time to get to this place where — I mean, they had to put a pad on the back of the door because I was hurting my hand from slamming it against the door. It was cathartic in a way too.

    It seemed whether or not Mark S. completed Cold Harbor would be the most important decision he would make, but those final minutes became a true test. What did that reveal to you about the personhood of these innies?

    Scott: Once Helly shows up at the end of the hallway, I feel like Mark knows exactly what he’s going to do, but it’s certainly not an easy thing to do. His mission for most of the season has been to get Ms. Casey out of there for the benefit of his outie. It’s only in the very recent past that he’s started advocating for himself and making decisions about what to do for his well-being and getting to communicate directly with the outie revealed a lot. He’s in love with Helly and can see the anguish from who he knows as Ms. Casey. But walking through that door may mean that he ceases to exist. Walking into the [other] unknown, where you’re alive, first of all, but also, he gets to be with the person he’s in love with, I think that becomes the only choice for him. It’s not an easy thing to arrive at. It’s the one choice they did not really consider, Mark and Helen, when they were having a logical conversation about it.

    In seeing how people discuss this show, it sometimes makes me feel like I have to question everything. On my third watch of the finale, I started to think, Is that really Helena searching for innie Mark to keep him from leaving?

    Lower: That’s Helly R. in the final episode. But I think, in [Episode 9], Dylan has thrown some doubt in her own understanding of herself. She’s lost this father figure in Irving and then she’s lost this brother figure because Dylan seems to have turned his back on her, at least in that episode. When Mark, at the beginning of [Episode 10], presents her with this chance for him to get to live in some capacity, and she’s just seen her weird dad, who’s told her, “Oh, I see Kier in you,” it cast some doubt inside of herself that she has a family anymore.

    I think when Dylan comes back and to the vending machine and the marching band [is playing] and he’s on her side, then all of a sudden she’s standing on a desk remembering Irving and remembering that their half-lives are worth fighting for, I think she just runs to go see Mark one last time. Maybe there’s a chance they can do this all together. For all they know, if he crosses that barrier, they’re going to take down Lumon entirely and all of these innies are going to get wiped away. I think it’s just gut instinct that she runs.

    There’s such a brief moment in that rescue mission where Gemma and outie Mark are reunited, but they can’t enjoy it for long. So much is captured in that embrace and look. What did you write on the page for that moment?

    Erickson: It was pretty similar to what ended up onscreen. What was so interesting about it to me was that you have these different dynamics that you see in rapid succession — in the Cold Harbor room, it’s outie Mark and he’s recognizing his wife, but she doesn’t recognize him. He takes her out into the hallway and they do get that one brief moment where it’s both of them together. But I thought it was important that in that moment Gemma be the one to take his hand and say, “We have to go,” because this is her turf. She knows the way things work down here and even though she’s being rescued, she has this immediate impulse to protect him and get him to safety, even not understanding why he’s there or what’s going on or what he’s doing. She pulls him to the elevator, and, of course, we get innie Mark and Ms. Casey. Then the final tragic pairing is innie Mark and Gemma, where he ultimately turns his back on her for Helly. It was these four different relationships in rapid succession, but the fact that moment in the hallway leading up to the kiss in the elevator, for now, is all they get is extremely sad and it was hard to do that to Gemma, I’ll be honest. For me, caring about her as a character, it was hard to do that to her, but it felt like the right choice, dramatically.

    There’s that tender scene where Mark S. is back at the computer, on the cusp of finishing Cold Harbor, and Helly is trying to be supportive about moving forward with outie Mark’s plan. It’s a goodbye of sorts. What discussions did you have together about that moment?

    Stiller: “It’s a Wonderful Life” — it’s one of my favorite movies. There’s that moment of that phone call where Donna Reed and Jimmy Stewart are together, and they’re listening to her ex-boyfriend, they’re together, side by side, and you could just feel the energy between them. For some reason, that image was in my head when I was thinking about the two of them as they’re finishing the file; where they’re focused on the screen and they don’t know who’s watching them or what, so they can’t really embrace. But I felt like that closeness, that energy, was something that made sense in that moment.

    Lower: They’re putting their faces close to the phone, but they’re really just trying to listen to each other breathe. This is their [Helly R. and Mark S.] last moment to listen to each other closely.

    Scott: I remember sitting down and we were really connected and it just took its own shape as we were doing it. It was certainly a heartbreaking scene.

    Lower: We’re in MDR. It was one of the first times we filmed with the lights low. Typically, it’s this very fluorescent light. So the mood was already shifted by the lighting design and just feeling how many scenes we had done in that space — it felt like time traveling. Even Helly referring to the first conversation they had, which is him asking her to name a state that she remembers. She’s referring back to that moment and she’s also [thinking] this might be the end of her life. It was a really emotional day. Ben was coming over and getting choked up in between takes.

    The way innie Mark tells Helly, “But I want to live with you” shattered me.

    Stiller: He’s so vulnerable there. It felt to me like I was seeing him in a way I hadn’t seen him before, because innie Mark is more innocent. It just felt like that core reality of when you’re not going to see someone who you love and who you want to be with — almost like a little kid. That was what was so beautiful about what he did and and what Britt did, they were so open and vulnerable and connected. There’s so many different tones to the show that in that moment, it felt like we knew that was an important scene. And it it had to be a very simple scene.

    Dan, what interests you in Helly and Mark’s relationship? And what interests you in Gemma and Mark’s relationship?

    Erickson: There’s an inherent innocence to their [Helly and Mark’s] romance. You meet them in the beginning of the show, they’re like children, and they have that energy of a first love that I think many of us never recapture, even if we go on and we find other relationships that are even more rewarding over the course of our lives. At the same time, they’re not children, they are adults, and they are trying to fight this thing together. They’re trying to fight for their own autonomy and over their own bodies and over their own lives. There’s a sense of being in a struggle together and the sense that she awakens something in him because he is much more compliant at the beginning of the show. There’s a lot to root for there.

    [With Gemma and Mark,] what really becomes fascinating to me is, after they’ve been through trauma together, it juxtaposes the innocence of Mark and Helly. Mark and Gemma have been through some of the worst moments of their lives together, and it has strained their relationship and it’s tested their relationship. I think by the end of that [flashback] episode, you get the sense that it’s not as idyllic as maybe we thought. And they have chosen to stay together, and there’s something really beautiful and powerful in that.

    Is there a world where there’s a happy ending for everyone?

    Erickson: It’s hard and it’s complicated because with the innie and outie dynamic, it’s sort of a zero-sum game, where however much life one of them has, that means the other has less. Reintegration has been raised as a possibility. But there’s also the question of to what degree does that decimate the identity of each? Who would this new person be and how much would they resemble the innie or the outie? I’m an optimist. I do think that there’s room for a happy ending, but it sure is complicated.

    The show has so much social commentary, but what I find myself responding to is that you can’t escape grief and that desire to not feel it is so relatable. I wonder how seeing a life devoid of it has made you appreciate the anguish of feeling it.

    Lachman: There’s so much about the show that is an allegory for the human condition to want to avoid things that are unpleasant or difficult or part of that subconscious pain. When I first read the scripts and was preparing for the role, I read a lot of Eckhart Tolle and [Carl] Jung. There’s so many ideas here at play. The whole severance journey could even be a spiritual one and the reintegration of the subconscious and the conscious mind. Maybe all these little innies are just little parts of ourselves that we shut down, that come to life with the severance [procedure]. I don’t know. That’s how I explored my characters as I was approaching it. You can’t experience true joy and happiness without the contrast of that pain, and maybe people respond to the show the way that they do, with such passion, because in a way it’s like looking in a mirror of society and reminding ourselves of our humanity and really embracing all the different parts of our self. I loved where Adam [as both Marks], so beautifully, has this conversation with himself because even though it’s in this soft sci-fi world, it’s so relatable because we do that internally all the time.

    Scott: I was just thinking about this the other day because we’re talking about the [idea of] trying to divide up and compartmentalize your life — everything in your life is somewhat compartmentalized. You’re constantly doing that for yourself. If the goal of Mark was to compartmentalize grief and to offset it so he just doesn’t have to deal with it, I feel like it’s not really doing a particularly good job of that because he doesn’t have to exist for a few hours a day, but that grief is following him around. I think that grief is like that. It’s like this formless, invisible gas that’s going to find you wherever you are, and so escaping it is pretty futile. It comes in different forms and sneaks up and presents itself when you least expect it. He’s feeling all of it, he’s just kind of taking a little break during the day, but it’s still there when he gets home.

    It’s interesting to see the massive culture of forecasting and analyzing around “Severance.” As an actor, what’s it like to be part of something with that kind of active viewing and analysis?

    Lower: It’s such a gift as an artist for someone to take something you’ve made and to think about their lives and make analogies. For a show that’s about consciousness, for the world of the show to be expanding in the audience’s consciousness, it feels wonderful. And for the show to be coming out weekly, it has a chance to continue expanding each week. For people to be sitting around and thinking about it and talking about it and wondering what they would do, that’s just such a great compliment.

    Scott: I think it’s incredible. I think it’s so cool that people are taking the time to comb through episodes, not only looking for clues, but they’re not missing anything. They are watching the show. I talked to my dad yesterday and he said he watches it with my stepmom, and then he watches it on his computer so he’s right up close to it so he can look for clues. I was a huge “Lost” fan and huge “Twilight Zone” person, so I totally get it. I don’t really dive into all the theories and stuff on this, but I have seen some on Instagram, which is usually video of a podcast where they’re really diving into one theory or the other. Also, all of the artwork that people are making, it’s overwhelming and incredible. Whenever I see one on Instagram, I save every single one. To be a part of something that is having this particular reaction is incredible —

    Lachman: Because it’s inspiring people to be creative themselves. I don’t know how many opportunities you get to do that — being a part of something where it just spawns this whole culture of creativity.

    Season 3 hasn’t officially been announced, but it seems like a sure thing. Both Marks and Helena-Helly are going through identity conflicts all through Season 2. How do you see this decision in the finale helping or complicating that?

    Erickson: It shows innie Mark, having gone through the growth to see himself as an individual worthy of life and worthy of protection, he no longer feels that he is an appendage of his outie or an offshoot of his outie. He, through his love of Helly and his time on the floor, sees himself as a person. But it’s going to drive a hell of a wedge between him and outie Mark, I’ll tell you that much, because while innie Mark did get her to safety, he didn’t follow her and so he has robbed his outie of that reunion, which is what he’s been wanting the entire series, is to be back with his wife who he lost. I would imagine that to outie Mark, that feels like an extreme betrayal.

    Adam, have you asked that there be less running for you in Season 3? Are you tapped out for more of that or still game?

    Scott: That is such a good idea. Why have I not thought of this? It might be too late, I don’t know. For Season 3, I really feel like Dylan could take over Lumon, you know?

    Lower: [laughs] I agree.

    Scott: Life at Lumon would be much easier — or it would get way worse. I feel like it’s a toss-up, but as a viewer, I would like to see it.

  • How did Snow White become the year’s most cursed movie?

    How did Snow White become the year’s most cursed movie?

    Disney’s latest live-action adventure has been at the centre of various controversies over casting, alleged feuds and delays

    Once upon a time, Disney made a business decision: if it was going to adapt its library of animated movies into live-action features (with merch and theme park tie-ins galore), it should add Snow White to the pipeline. The 1937 classic – the company’s first full-length animated feature ever, its first crack at a veritable goldmine of princess IP – would follow the modernizations (and attendant revisions) of Cinderella and Beauty and the Beast, released in 2015 and 2017, respectively. It was only logical, Snow White being one of its most recognizable and brand-defining characters. The company began developing a live-action feature in 2016, in the heady first wave of its IP era.

    Nine years later, Snow White has finally made it the big screen, but the journey has been anything but a fairy tale. The remake has been a saga of delays, culture war flashpoints and controversies, some earned and much not. The new Snow White has managed the difficult feat of being a children’s movie that irritates both ends of the political spectrum at once, from rightwing nuts crying “woke” over the casting of Rachel Zegler, an American actor of Colombian descent, to pro-Palestine advocates upset over the presence of Israeli actor and IDF supporter Gal Gadot as the Evil Queen. And that’s not even getting to the obvious and nagging issue of the titular seven dwarves.

    The title proved toxic enough that Disney took the rare step of scaling back its premiere six days ahead of its release, limiting the media presence to talent-friendly in-house press. (Though not without precedent – Warner Bros acted similarly with the 2023 rollout for The Flash, premiering in the midst of star Ezra Miller’s many scandals.) People have picked up on the fact that, well, the vibes are not good, with multiple reports that Disney is going through the motions to get it over and done with, stumbling to the finish line.

    How did this bankable story become Disney’s poisoned apple? Snow White has seemed cursed from the start, in part by Disney business logic and in part by the misfortune of landing in an environment hankering for disproportionate outrage. The issues began with the announcement of Zegler as the German fairy tale princess who canonically (starting with the Brothers Grimm in 1812) possessed “skin as white as snow”. The new version revises the etymology, opening the tale with an explanation that she was named for surviving a snowstorm when she was an infant. (A similar story was used to explain the name of Ginnifer Goodwin’s version of the character on the ABC fantasy series Once Upon a Time.) Rightwing commentators cried “woke”, with plenty of straight-up racism and outright harassment, similar to the kind heaped on Halle Bailey, a Black actor and singer, after she was cast in the Little Mermaid in 2019, including physical harassment. “There was a lot of harassment from a certain group of people – they were showing up at my apartment and screaming profanities,” Zegler, 23, told Cosmopolitan last year.

    There was also pushback to Zegler’s comments about the original film, largely taken out of context to show that she disrespected it. In line with the feminist-ish framings of Cinderella and Beauty and the Beast, Zegler marketed Snow White as a modern update of the 1937 film by pointing out that film’s shortcomings. She called the original “extremely dated when it comes to the ideas of women being in roles of power and what a woman is fit for” and described it as “came out in 1937, and very evidently so” with “a big focus on her love story with a guy who literally stalks her”.

    Selling Snow White’s agency only fanned the flames. “She’s not going to be saved by the prince and she’s not going to be dreaming about true love,” she said at Disney’s D23 meet-and-greet in 2022. “She’s dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be and the leader that her late father told her that she could be if she was fearless, fair, brave and true.” In truth, there is a love interest for Snow White played by Broadway’s Andrew Burnap, who certainly looks the part of Disney prince. But the specter of a downgraded Prince Charming triggered outrage on both sides of the Atlantic, from Twitter accounts with names like “End Wokeness”, Britain’s Daily Mail and the US rightwing channel Daily Wire, which made its own anti-woke rival movie in response.

    Meanwhile, Disney caught flak for its handling of the seven dwarves. Actor Peter Dinklage, who has a form of dwarfism called achondroplasia, blasted the remake as “fucking backwards”. Though he praised Zegler’s casting, he said, “you’re progressive in one way but you’re still making that fucking backward story of seven dwarves living in the cave. What the fuck are you doing, man?” (Disney released a statement saying it had been “consulting with members of the dwarfism community” to “avoid reinforcing stereotypes”.) Others criticized Disney for using CGI to create the seven “magical creatures,” thus depriving dwarf performers of potential jobs. (Another Snow White spinoff, Snow White and the Huntsman, was criticized upon release in 2014 for casting actors of average height, including Ian McShane and Bob Hoskins, as the dwarves.)

    Creative issues kept the film in limbo as its budget ballooned to over $270m. Then the dual writers and actors strikes delayed its release a full year later. Meanwhile, Zegler found herself mired in even more controversy for publicly mourning Donald Trump’s 2024 electoral victory on Instagram, writing that she hoped he and his supporters “never know peace”. (The West Side Story actor later apologized – “Hatred and anger have caused us to move further and further away from peace and understanding, and I am sorry I contributed to the negative discourse,” she wrote in an Instagram story.) Rumors abounded of bad blood between Zegler, who has supported Palestine during Israel’s invasion of Gaza, and Gadot, a vocal proponent of the Israeli military, and the film found itself at the intersection of another hot-blooded conflict; just this week, protesters from both sides disrupted Gadot’s Walk of Fame ceremony in Hollywood.

    All of this has Disney appearing skittish. Advance ticket sales did not open until two weeks before the domestic premiere, an unusually small window. For comparison, Disney opened ticket sales for this past holidays’ Mufasa: The Lion King and 2023 summer tentpole The Little Mermaid, the most recent Disney live-action features, a month in advance of their premieres. Then there was the pared-down US premiere, which the studio’s said offered “a more celebratory, family-friendly afternoon event to match the tone and target audience for the film”. While Gadot made the rounds in New York, appearing on Good Morning America, Live With Kelly & Mark and The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon, Zegler led the relatively quiet roll-out in Europe; instead of a splashy UK premiere, she performed an original song at a castle in Spain.

    But the show goes on – both actors appeared all smiles at the US premiere, posing for photos together with director Marc Webb. In a premiere-week interview with Allure, Zegler provided very media-trained appeals to kindness and tolerance. “Snow White chooses kindness and still makes change,” she said. “Power takes many forms. I hope we’ll see a new dawn of kindness and acceptance in the next couple of years.”

    Bad press aside, the story of Snow White is not yet written in stone. The film was met with lukewarm to positive reviews, with the Hollywood Reporter praising it as a “mostly captivating” update to the tale and the New York Times calling it “perfectly adequate”, and OK-enough box office projections. Most estimates have Snow White grossing around $40-50m in the US and over $100m globally – nowhere near the $357m made during Beauty and the Beast’s opening weekend nor its $270m budget, but not a full flop. Its fortunes may still be improved by a relative lack of competition during a slow month for the box office, but that would also depend on its core base of viewers – mothers and daughters – showing up despite, not because of, controversy it has thus far failed to escape. The ultimate legacy of Snow White remains unwritten, but it enters its premiere weekend a troubled tale.

  • Wings Hauser, ‘Vice Squad’ Star and Hollywood Character Actor, Dies at 78

    Wings Hauser, ‘Vice Squad’ Star and Hollywood Character Actor, Dies at 78

    Hollywood lost one of its most magnetic character actors this weekend — Wings Hauser, whose raw intensity and unforgettable presence lit up screens for nearly six decades, passed away at 78 in his Santa Monica studio home.

    His wife, Cali Lili Hauser, shared the news with a touch of poetry, noting that Wings “took flight” in her arms. For those who followed his career, the metaphor couldn’t be more fitting. Like his namesake, Wings soared through Hollywood’s ever-changing landscape, never quite settling into the comfortable predictability that claims so many actors.

    Born Gerald Dwight Hauser (a name that practically begged for the lights of Broadway), Wings emerged from entertainment royalty as the son of Academy Award-winner Dwight A. Hauser. But Hollywood’s golden child chose the grittier path. Rather than riding his father’s coattails, he blazed his own trail through the industry’s back alleys and side streets.

    The role that cemented his reputation? A chilling turn as Ramrod, a violent pimp in 1982’s “Vice Squad.” The performance showcased not just his acting chops but revealed an unexpected musical talent — Wings penned and performed the film’s haunting theme song. That duality, that raw creative energy, became his calling card.

    Speaking of legacies — the Hauser name continues to echo through Tinseltown. His son Cole (currently stealing scenes as Rip Wheeler on “Yellowstone”) carries the torch with the same intensity that marked his father’s work. At last year’s “Yellowstone” season 5 premiere, Cole shared a piece of Wings’ enduring wisdom: “Persist until you succeed… You’re gonna get knocked down in this business. You’re gonna be told ‘no’ a lot, but just keep following your dreams.”

    Those weren’t empty words. Wings’ own journey through Hollywood spans more than 100 credits — a sprawling filmography that reads like a greatest hits of American television. From “Magnum, P.I.” to “Criminal Minds,” from his memorable run as Greg Foster on “The Young and the Restless” (1977-1981, with a 2010 victory lap) — Wings kept reinventing himself as the industry evolved.

    His finest moment? Maybe it was the Independent Spirit Award nomination for 1987’s “Tough Guys Don’t Dance.” Or perhaps it was any of the countless character roles where he brought depth to what could have been throwaway parts.

    At the time of his passing, Wings was crafting his own story — “Working Class Actor,” a documentary about his life and career. His wife Cali has vowed to complete the project, preserving what she describes as “their partnership, their love story and honoring his legacy.”

    True to form, Wings’ final wish spoke volumes about the man behind the roles. Rather than traditional memorials, he asked supporters to back ongoing projects at the couple’s sustainable indie film and music studio — a space that doubles as a sanctuary for sea life and butterflies. Even in departure, Wings was thinking about the bigger picture.

    He leaves behind his wife Cali, children Bright and Cole Hauser, two sisters, and five grandchildren — Hutchinson, Holden, Ryland, Colt, and Steely Rose. As Hollywood grapples with another streaming revolution and AI-generated performances, Wings’ passing feels like the end of an era. A time when character actors could become legends through sheer force of personality and an unwavering dedication to their craft.

  • Pentagon restores histories of Navajo Code Talkers, other Native veterans after public outcry

    Pentagon restores histories of Navajo Code Talkers, other Native veterans after public outcry

    PHOENIX (AP) — The Pentagon restored some webpages highlighting the crucial wartime contributions of Navajo Code Talkers and other Native American veterans on Wednesday, days after tribes condemned the action.

    The initial removal was part of a sweep of any military content that promoted diversity, equity and inclusion, or commonly referred to as DEI. Following President Donald Trump’s broader executive order ending the federal government’s DEI programs, the Defense Department deleted thousands of pages honoring contributions by women and minority groups. Department officials say the Navajo Code Talker material was erroneously erased.

    “In the rare cases that content is removed — either deliberately or by mistake — that is out of the clearly outlined scope of the directive, we instruct the components and they correct the content so it recognizes our heroes for their dedicated service alongside their fellow Americans, period,” Pentagon press secretary John Ullyot said in a statement.

    Several webpages on the Code Talkers landed on a “404 – Page not found” message Tuesday. Some were back up Wednesday — although any that also mention Native American Heritage Month remain down. Thousands of other pages deleted in the DEI purge are still offline.

    White House officials informed the Navajo Nation that an artificial intelligence-powered automated review process looking for content with DEI initiatives led to the elimination of anything mentioning “Navajo,” according to a statement from Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren.

    Nygren, who sent a letter to the Defense Department requesting clarity on the issue, said he’s pleased by the resolution.

    “I want to assure the Navajo people that we remain in close communication with federal officials to ensure the legacy of our cherished Navajo Code Talkers is never erased from American and Navajo history,” Nygren said.

    He also pointed out the 574 federally recognized tribes across the U.S. are sovereign nations and not defined by DEI classifications, a stance broadly supported by other Native American leaders who also sent letters to the Trump administration.

    The U.S. Marine Corps initially recruited 29 Navajo men to develop a code based on the unwritten Navajo language in World War II. Using Navajo words for red soil, war chief, clan, braided hair, beads, ant and hummingbird, for example, they came up with a glossary of more than 200 terms, later expanded, and an alphabet. To convey the word “send,” Code Talkers would say the Navajo words for “sheep, eyes, nose and deer.”

    Hundreds of Navajos followed in their footsteps, sending thousands of messages without error on Japanese troop movements, battlefield tactics and other communications crucial to the war’s ultimate outcome. The code stumped Japanese military cryptologists.

    The Code Talkers participated in all assaults the Marines led in the Pacific from 1942 to 1945 and are credited with helping the U.S. win the war. Hundreds of Native Americans from more than 20 tribes also served as code talkers during World War I and World War II, according to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian. Among them were Choctaw, Cherokee, Osage, Chippewa and Hopi speakers.

    Among those alarmed to hear of the missing Navajo Code Talker webpages was Peter MacDonald, 96. He and Thomas H. Begay are the only two Navajo Code Talkers still living today.

    “That code became a very valuable weapon and not only saved hundreds of thousands of soldiers, but it also helped win the war in the Pacific,” MacDonald said by phone from his home in Tuba City in the Arizona portion of the Navajo Nation. “And it has absolutely nothing to do with DEI.”

    A Republican who voted for Trump, MacDonald said he thinks the current administration needs to better walk the line between getting rid of DEI and ignoring history.

    “That’s why I’m very concerned that communication from the Pentagon down to the various military units should be taught or learn that this information is history, and you don’t want to hide history,” MacDonald said.

    The Defense Department has had to issue reassurances that it is not omitting historic achievements by servicemen and women of color. Besides the Code Talkers, the agency also on Wednesday restored a webpage describing baseball and civil rights icon Jackie Robinson’s military service after it was missing earlier in the day. Last week, pages honoring a Black Medal of Honor winner and Japanese American service members were also restored.

    “Everyone at the Defense Department loves Jackie Robinson, as well as the Navajo Code Talkers, the Tuskegee airmen, the Marines at Iwo Jima and so many others — we salute them for their strong and in many cases heroic service to our country, full stop,” Ullyot said. “We do not view or highlight them through the prism of immutable characteristics, such as race, ethnicity or sex.”

    Michael Smith, whose father, Samuel “Jesse” Smith Sr., was a Navajo Code Talker, questioned why these pages were removed at all.

    “I don’t know how taking Navajo Code Talkers off the Department of Defense website is saving the United States any money because that’s not consistent with the president’s order,” said Smith, who helps organize annual celebrations of the Code Talkers.

    Gov. Stephen Roe Lewis of the Gila River Indian Community in Arizona also expressed disappointment, claiming there was missing content relating to all Native American veterans, including Ira Hayes. Hayes was an enrolled member of the tribe and one of six Marines featured in an iconic 1945 Associated Press photograph of U.S. forces raising an American flag during the Battle of Iwo Jima.

    Even with some being reposted, he remains worried web content removal is “the tip of the iceberg.”

    “The way it looks in the (executive) order, this language is skewed and made to sound like the diversity programs are the ones that are unethical,” Smith said.

  • All the Revelations in Severance’s Supersize Finale, Explained

    All the Revelations in Severance’s Supersize Finale, Explained

    The innies are running the asylum. The finale of Severance’s second season gave most of us what we wanted — a reunion of outie Mark Scout (Adam Scott) with his imprisoned and once-thought-dead wife Gemma (Dichen Lachman) — and then ripped it away with a twist that was both brutal and, perhaps in retrospect, inevitable. After finally managing to talk to each other via camcorder, Mark’s innie and outie work together to bust Gemma out of Lumon Industries’ testing floor and severed floor, two areas where her brain snaps into different consciousnesses with no knowledge of the other. Gemma reaches an exit stairwell where she inhabits her regular, outie brain, but Mark’s innie decides he’d rather not effectively kill himself by going with her.

    Instead, innie Mark runs back into the arms of Helly (Britt Lower), the severed version of Lumon scion Helena Eagan. They head back into the recesses of the severed floor, where a bunch of severed marching-band employees are holding cowed severed-floor overseer Mr. Milchick (Tramell Tillman) hostage. Harmony Cobel (Patricia Arquette), Milchick’s predecessor before she turned on Lumon, began this season by telling Mark’s outie that there would be “no honeymoon ending” for him and the missing Gemma. She ended it by telling Mark’s innie that there’d be none of that with Helly, either. We’ve learned that innies are just as stubborn as their outies about giving up a shot at a future with the only person they love.

    Apple hasn’t told us yet that we’re getting a third season of Severance, but it feels like only a matter of time, because this show is having a cultural moment that transcends Apple TV+’s otherwise tiny place in the streaming ecosystem. Much of the enthusiasm comes in the form of fan theories, and we learned in the season finale that some of the internet’s most popular hypotheses were bang-on, while others were way off. And while the finale had no shortage of infodumps, we ultimately learned almost nothing about the fates of our characters, save for dead Lumon security boss Drummond (Ólafur Darri Ólafsson), who learned the hard way what happens when an innie’s finger is on the trigger as he snaps into his outie’s consciousness while riding a Lumon elevator.

    Where are we, then? Here’s where various fan theories and open questions stand after “Cold Harbor.”

    What were all those numbers on Mark’s computer?

    They were little pieces of Gemma’s consciousness. “The building blocks of her mind,” as Cobel told Mark’s innie.

    A lot of amateur theorists had pegged this one from the first episode of the season (or even before), when the show flashed a black-and-white picture of Gemma, looking like a testing subject, as Mark and his fellow macrodata refiners dragged numbers into boxes. We still don’t know exactly what makes numbers correspond to the categories Mark gave them, but we do know what those categories are: Mark was sorting them to correspond to Lumon cult founder Kier Eagan’s “Four Tempers” of woe, frolic, dread, and malice, which seems to be Lumon-speak for what are sometimes thought to be the four basic emotions: sadness, happiness, fear, and anger. Over his two years at Lumon, Mark has now reconstructed 25 different versions of Gemma’s mind, each representing its own innie when Gemma steps into a different testing room.

    What is Cold Harbor?

    The final test of the 25 that Lumon has now run on Gemma. We saw some of the previous tests in Episode 7 of this season, when Gemma’s different innies were living life in an endless loop of dentist appointments, violently turbulent flights, and traumatic Christmas-card writing. I theorized then that Lumon was using Gemma to test consumer applications of the severance procedure, which could unburden people from the memories of painful or unpleasant moments. I still feel good about that theory after seeing what Lumon did to Gemma’s innie in “Cold Harbor,” the final test. The company had her disassemble a crib, calling back to her memory from Episode 7 of Mark taking apart a crib after Gemma miscarried during their marriage. (Lumon also played Billie Holiday’s take on “I’ll Be Seeing You,” a favorite of Mark and Gemma in their outie existence.) The couple’s fertility struggles set Gemma on the road to Lumon in the first place.

    The severance barriers held even as Lumon put Gemma’s new innie through the most emotionally torturous test possible. Or at least they were holding, until Mark burst in. The Cold Harbor version of Gemma didn’t know who Mark’s outie was, and she initially threatened him with a piece of the crib, but she seemed to realize after a few seconds that Mark was at least a trustworthy person. Was this a case of love overpowering severance? Maybe! Once Gemma snapped into her outie self in the testing floor hallway, she and Mark finally had their moment back together in their own heads. It was sadly short.

    What makes Gemma’s case different from the standard severance procedure? Didn’t Mark’s severance also free him from his grief when he thought Gemma was dead?

    The simple answer is that Gemma is being severed a lot. Mark has one innie, but Gemma has 25. Lumon may find both commercial and spiritual value in learning how to split a person’s brain into 25 different consciousnesses. With one innie, Lumon can free someone from the pain of work, or of birthing a child, but with as many as 25, Lumon may be able to achieve what seems to have been its ultimate goal since its days making ether: freedom from all pain.

    Why does Lumon have an indoor goat pasture on the severed floor?

    Cobel had informed Mark’s outie in the previous episode that Gemma would die when Mark’s innie finished his Cold Harbor data refinement. We learned in the finale that not only was Lumon likely to slaughter Gemma once it was done with this last test but also — in perhaps a twist on Judeo-Christian tradition — a cute little goat.

    Back in the third episode of the season, we met Lush, the severed goat farmer played by Game of Thrones star Gwendoline Christie, a member of the Lumon department known as Mammalians Nurturable, and one of the most baffling questions since the show’s first season has been “What’s up with the goats?” We’ve now learned that the company has a dark, sacred vision for the goats. Lumon’s plan, Drummond tells Lush, is that Lumon will ceremonially sacrifice the goat and then “this beast will be entombed with a cherished woman whose spirit it must guide to Kier’s door.”

    But while the show may have begun to tell us what’s up with the goats, there are still questions. Recall that Lush asks Drummond, “How many more must I give?,” and earlier in the season, when Helena meets Mark’s outie, she mistakes Gemma’s name as “Hannah.” How many women has Lumon kidnapped and held for testing? How many goats has it slaughtered with them?

    Why did Lumon’s CEO secretly father countless children?

    The Eagans are wildly creepy people, but it felt gross even by their standards to learn at the end of Episode 9 that current (and elderly) Lumon chief executive Jame Eagan (Michael Siberry) is a serial fatherer of new babies. “She’s one of Jame’s,” Cobel tells a security guard at the company’s severed birthing retreat, using the line to sneak outie Mark’s sister, Devon, into the facility with her.

    It turns out that Jame believes his existing children, Helena included, are all disappointments. They do not remind him of Kier. But Helly, the innie version of his daughter, has the founder’s fire. Helly, the innie, now seems to be Jame’s pick to succeed him as the boss of the company. Not sure how that would work! Helly certainly would not want it anyway.

    What did Jame Eagan mean when he said that Helly had tricked him?

    It was a popular theory over the past week that Helly, the innie, had somehow escaped Lumon’s severed floor for a second time and was cosplaying as her outie to sabotage Lumon from headquarters. Nope. When Jame entered the severed floor at the end of Episode 9 and told Helly, “You tricked me,” he was just referring to the end of Season 1, when Helly pretended to be her outie and then gave a speech at a Lumon gala about the company’s abuse of the innies. There was no fresh meat on that bone.

    Is Seth Milchick a company man or part of the resistance?

    All season, Severance has seemed to lay the groundwork for Milchick to turn against Lumon and become an ally of Mark and the other innies. Early on in the season, the company gifts Milchick a painting of the very much not-Black founder, Kier, only with Black skin, so that Milchick can “see himself” in the tradition of the company. Milchick is visibly uncomfortable. Drummond castigates Milchick for using an elegant vocabulary, something Milchick might not be doing in the first place if not for his need to make a name for himself at an almost all-white company. The security boss blames Milchick for failures that aren’t his fault, and by Episode 9, Milchick has had enough, telling Drummond to “devour feculence.” In the finale, during a ridiculous company skit involving an animatronic statue of the founder, Milchick breaks character and notes that the real Kier was five inches shorter than the one that’s been wheeled onto the severed floor.

    And yet. Milchick not only does nothing to help Mark bust out Gemma but tries hard to get in his way. For Milchick, the season ends in purgatory. Lumon is poised to punish him for letting Gemma get away, but the company might not even get the chance, because a bunch of severed marching-band musicians are holding Milchick hostage in MDR. Your employer doesn’t see you as family, Seth.

    What about the oft-theorized Lumon plan to build a whole severed workforce?

    A common fan theory holds that Lumon wants an army of severed workers, maybe ones who never leave the building and thus don’t even have outies. In this episode, we meet the marching band from Choreography and Merriment, a department we haven’t seen before. There are dozens of musicians in this band, and they comport themselves more or less like robots, not deviating from their act or acknowledging others’ speech until Helly and Dylan (Zach Cherry) convince them to stop their song and assist in the hostage-taking of Milchick. Maybe Lumon has more severed workers than we thought.

    Is full reintegration even possible? And is Mark still pursuing it?

    No idea. We haven’t seen Reghabi (Karen Aldridge), the former Lumon doctor who was helping to merge Mark’s two minds, since she had a falling-out with Devon in Episode 7. (Mark’s sis was not happy about the unsanctioned brain surgery the doctor was doing on her brother.) Mark ends the season not fully reintegrated, though he and his innie have started to see little glimpses of each other’s lives. Some of the questions that innie Mark asks outie Mark about reintegration also seem like awfully good ones.

    Is someone in outie Mark’s family spying on him for Lumon?

    Probably not. Lots of Severance fans are under the impression that Mark’s brother-in-law, Ricken — or maybe even his sister, Devon — is a Lumon mole keeping tabs on his outie. We get no whiff of that from Devon in the finale, as she helped plan what amounted to a second Macrodat Uprising, and Ricken was absent (save for flashbacks to Mark and Gemma’s old life) from the final few episodes of the season. Not every theory about this show will be a winner.

    Where have you gone, Irving?

    Irving B. (John Turturro) has spent years trying to merge the memories of his innie and outie, and both versions of him have been among the most rebellious fighters against Lumon. The company knows what Irving is up to, and in Episode 9 of the season, Jame Eagan tells Helena, “We’re seeing to Mr. Bailiff.” Excitement about finally learning Irving’s last name aside, he was the target of a Lumon manhunt. The company likely would have killed him, but Irving’s innie love interest, Burt (Christopher Walken), drives him to a train station and sends him away. Burt is a low-level Lumon enforcer of some kind, but he feels an attachment to Irving on the outside as well as the inside. We see neither of them in the finale, and I’m not sure if we ever will again.

    Why does the final shot of the season look exactly how it does?

    The most heart-wrenching moment of the second season is its last. Innie Mark and Helly leave outie Gemma sobbing in an exit stairwell, rescued from Lumon’s torture but abandoned on the outside because innie Mark has decided to stay inside with the love of his tortured life, Helly. If Gemma can get all the way outside of Lumon’s office complex, she’ll be physically free after two years as a lab rat, but she’ll be alone in the same way her husband was when he thought she had died in a car crash. Plus, there’s always the threat that Lumon could “see to” her.

    What happens after Mark and Helly turn away from the exit caught my eye. The two characters are almost skipping down the hallways of the severed floor, laughing and holding hands. I might even call their movements frolicking. But in the episode’s closing seconds, two things happen. First, Mark and Helly’s smiles begin to fade. As with the runaway lovers in the famous final moments of The Graduate, it all dissolves to closing credits (and some very 1960s-styled credits at that) just as doubts seem to set in. (What is Lumon going to do to them now that they’ve led a second revolt and Mark has killed a high-level Lumon employee? Does Lumon even have any more use for them now that Cold Harbor is complete?) Second, the screen fades out to red, a color that, many have theorized, Severance typically uses to represent the outside world. I don’t think that color choice was merely because Mark was covered in Drummond’s blood. What is Severance telling us when it cuts from two innies to a red screen?

  • Pentagon restores histories of Navajo Code Talkers, other Native veterans after public outcry

    Pentagon restores histories of Navajo Code Talkers, other Native veterans after public outcry

    PHOENIX (AP) — The Pentagon restored some webpages highlighting the crucial wartime contributions of Navajo Code Talkers and other Native American veterans on Wednesday, days after tribes condemned the action.

    The initial removal was part of a sweep of any military content that promoted diversity, equity and inclusion, or commonly referred to as DEI. Following President Donald Trump’s broader executive order ending the federal government’s DEI programs, the Defense Department deleted thousands of pages honoring contributions by women and minority groups. Department officials say the Navajo Code Talker material was erroneously erased.

    “In the rare cases that content is removed — either deliberately or by mistake — that is out of the clearly outlined scope of the directive, we instruct the components and they correct the content so it recognizes our heroes for their dedicated service alongside their fellow Americans, period,” Pentagon press secretary John Ullyot said in a statement.

    Several webpages on the Code Talkers landed on a “404 – Page not found” message Tuesday. Some were back up Wednesday — although any that also mention Native American Heritage Month remain down. Thousands of other pages deleted in the DEI purge are still offline.

    White House officials informed the Navajo Nation that an artificial intelligence-powered automated review process looking for content with DEI initiatives led to the elimination of anything mentioning “Navajo,” according to a statement from Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren.

    Nygren, who sent a letter to the Defense Department requesting clarity on the issue, said he’s pleased by the resolution.

    “I want to assure the Navajo people that we remain in close communication with federal officials to ensure the legacy of our cherished Navajo Code Talkers is never erased from American and Navajo history,” Nygren said.

    He also pointed out the 574 federally recognized tribes across the U.S. are sovereign nations and not defined by DEI classifications, a stance broadly supported by other Native American leaders who also sent letters to the Trump administration.

    The U.S. Marine Corps initially recruited 29 Navajo men to develop a code based on the unwritten Navajo language in World War II. Using Navajo words for red soil, war chief, clan, braided hair, beads, ant and hummingbird, for example, they came up with a glossary of more than 200 terms, later expanded, and an alphabet. To convey the word “send,” Code Talkers would say the Navajo words for “sheep, eyes, nose and deer.”

    Hundreds of Navajos followed in their footsteps, sending thousands of messages without error on Japanese troop movements, battlefield tactics and other communications crucial to the war’s ultimate outcome. The code stumped Japanese military cryptologists.

    The Code Talkers participated in all assaults the Marines led in the Pacific from 1942 to 1945 and are credited with helping the U.S. win the war. Hundreds of Native Americans from more than 20 tribes also served as code talkers during World War I and World War II, according to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian. Among them were Choctaw, Cherokee, Osage, Chippewa and Hopi speakers.

    Among those alarmed to hear of the missing Navajo Code Talker webpages was Peter MacDonald, 96. He and Thomas H. Begay are the only two Navajo Code Talkers still living today.

    “That code became a very valuable weapon and not only saved hundreds of thousands of soldiers, but it also helped win the war in the Pacific,” MacDonald said by phone from his home in Tuba City in the Arizona portion of the Navajo Nation. “And it has absolutely nothing to do with DEI.”

    A Republican who voted for Trump, MacDonald said he thinks the current administration needs to better walk the line between getting rid of DEI and ignoring history.

    “That’s why I’m very concerned that communication from the Pentagon down to the various military units should be taught or learn that this information is history, and you don’t want to hide history,” MacDonald said.

    The Defense Department has had to issue reassurances that it is not omitting historic achievements by servicemen and women of color. Besides the Code Talkers, the agency also on Wednesday restored a webpage describing baseball and civil rights icon Jackie Robinson’s military service after it was missing earlier in the day. Last week, pages honoring a Black Medal of Honor winner and Japanese American service members were also restored.

    “Everyone at the Defense Department loves Jackie Robinson, as well as the Navajo Code Talkers, the Tuskegee airmen, the Marines at Iwo Jima and so many others — we salute them for their strong and in many cases heroic service to our country, full stop,” Ullyot said. “We do not view or highlight them through the prism of immutable characteristics, such as race, ethnicity or sex.”

    Michael Smith, whose father, Samuel “Jesse” Smith Sr., was a Navajo Code Talker, questioned why these pages were removed at all.

    “I don’t know how taking Navajo Code Talkers off the Department of Defense website is saving the United States any money because that’s not consistent with the president’s order,” said Smith, who helps organize annual celebrations of the Code Talkers.

    Gov. Stephen Roe Lewis of the Gila River Indian Community in Arizona also expressed disappointment, claiming there was missing content relating to all Native American veterans, including Ira Hayes. Hayes was an enrolled member of the tribe and one of six Marines featured in an iconic 1945 Associated Press photograph of U.S. forces raising an American flag during the Battle of Iwo Jima.

    Even with some being reposted, he remains worried web content removal is “the tip of the iceberg.”

    “The way it looks in the (executive) order, this language is skewed and made to sound like the diversity programs are the ones that are unethical,” Smith said.

  • Justin Baldoni’s Lawyer Calls Blake Lively’s Request to Dismiss Lawsuit ‘Abhorrent,’ Will Continue to Hold Her ‘Accountable’

    Justin Baldoni’s Lawyer Calls Blake Lively’s Request to Dismiss Lawsuit ‘Abhorrent,’ Will Continue to Hold Her ‘Accountable’

    Justin Baldoni’s lawyer quickly responded to Blake Lively’s attempt to dismiss her It Ends With Us director and costar’s lawsuit against her, calling the move “abhorrent.”

    In their motion to dismiss on Thursday, March 20, Lively’s attorneys, Mike Gottlieb and Esra Hudson, called Baldoni’s $400 million lawsuit against Lively, 37, “vengeful and rambling.” They described Baldoni’s lawsuit as a “profound abuse of the legal process that has no place in federal court.”

    “Ms. Lively’s recent motion to dismiss herself from the self-concocted disaster she initiated is one of the most abhorrent examples of abusing our legal system,” Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, responded in a statement to PEOPLE later Thursday. “Stringent rules are put into place to protect the innocent and allow individuals to rightfully defend themselves. Laws are not meant to be twisted and curated by privileged elites to fit their own personal agenda.”

    Freedman also referenced his response to a motion Lively’s husband Ryan Reynolds filed on March 18. In that filing, Reynolds, 48, sought to dismiss Baldoni’s defamation claim against him.

    Related: Ryan Reynolds’ Rep Calls Him ‘the Man’ Justin Baldoni ‘Built His Brand Pretending to Be’ in Fiery New Statement

    “As we said yesterday in response to Mr. Reynolds’ same cowardly measures, we will continue to hold Ms. Lively accountable for her actions of pure malice which include falsely accusing my clients of harassment and retaliation,” Freedman continued Thursday. “Her fantastical claims will be swiftly debunked as discovery moves forward, easily disproved with actual, evidentiary proof.”

    The legal battle between the two stars began in December 2024 when Lively sued Baldoni, It Ends With Us producer Jamey Heath, Wayfarer Studios co-founder Steve Sarowitz, and others, accusing them of sexual harassment and orchestrating a smear campaign to damage her reputation.

    In January, Baldoni responded by filing a $400 million lawsuit against Reynolds, his wife Lively, their publicist Leslie Sloane and Sloane’s PR firm Vision PR, Inc. over the heated situation behind the scenes of It Ends With Us. On Thursday, Gottlieb and Hudson blasted the lawsuit as legally groundless and an effort to silence the actress.

    Related: Blake Lively’s Justin Baldoni Legal Battle Becomes Subject of Documentary Titled He Said, She Said

    Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

    “This lawsuit is a profound abuse of the legal process that has no place in federal court,” Lively’s lawyers said in a statement. “California law now expressly prohibits suing victims who speak out against sexual harassment or retaliation, whether in a lawsuit or in the press. This meritless and retaliatory lawsuit faces three insurmountable legal obstacles, including the litigation, fair report, and sexual harassment privileges. The latter contains a mandatory fee-shifting provision that will require billionaire Steve Sarowitz and Wayfarer Studios to pay damages. In an epic self-own, the Wayfarer Parties’ attempt to sue Ms. Lively ‘into oblivion’ has only created more liability for them — deservedly so, given their actions.”

    Lively’s team claims Baldoni and his co-defendants are subject to California Civil Code Section 47.1, a newly enacted law that prohibits retaliatory lawsuits tied to public disclosures of sexual harassment. They also called Baldoni’s claim that Lively “conspired” with The New York Times an intimidation tactic, arguing that she was legally entitled to disclose the contents of a complaint.

    Their trial is scheduled for a year from now on March 9, 2026.

    PEOPLE has reached out to Lively and her legal team for further comment.

  • Pentagon restores histories of Navajo Code Talkers, other Native veterans after public outcry

    Pentagon restores histories of Navajo Code Talkers, other Native veterans after public outcry

    PHOENIX (AP) — The Pentagon restored some webpages highlighting the crucial wartime contributions of Navajo Code Talkers and other Native American veterans on Wednesday, days after tribes condemned the action.

    The initial removal was part of a sweep of any military content that promoted diversity, equity and inclusion, or commonly referred to as DEI. Following President Donald Trump’s broader executive order ending the federal government’s DEI programs, the Defense Department deleted thousands of pages honoring contributions by women and minority groups. Department officials say the Navajo Code Talker material was erroneously erased.

    “In the rare cases that content is removed — either deliberately or by mistake — that is out of the clearly outlined scope of the directive, we instruct the components and they correct the content so it recognizes our heroes for their dedicated service alongside their fellow Americans, period,” Pentagon press secretary John Ullyot said in a statement.

    Several webpages on the Code Talkers landed on a “404 – Page not found” message Tuesday. Some were back up Wednesday — although any that also mention Native American Heritage Month remain down. Thousands of other pages deleted in the DEI purge are still offline.

    White House officials informed the Navajo Nation that an artificial intelligence-powered automated review process looking for content with DEI initiatives led to the elimination of anything mentioning “Navajo,” according to a statement from Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren.

    Nygren, who sent a letter to the Defense Department requesting clarity on the issue, said he’s pleased by the resolution.

    “I want to assure the Navajo people that we remain in close communication with federal officials to ensure the legacy of our cherished Navajo Code Talkers is never erased from American and Navajo history,” Nygren said.

    He also pointed out the 574 federally recognized tribes across the U.S. are sovereign nations and not defined by DEI classifications, a stance broadly supported by other Native American leaders who also sent letters to the Trump administration.

    The U.S. Marine Corps initially recruited 29 Navajo men to develop a code based on the unwritten Navajo language in World War II. Using Navajo words for red soil, war chief, clan, braided hair, beads, ant and hummingbird, for example, they came up with a glossary of more than 200 terms, later expanded, and an alphabet. To convey the word “send,” Code Talkers would say the Navajo words for “sheep, eyes, nose and deer.”

    Hundreds of Navajos followed in their footsteps, sending thousands of messages without error on Japanese troop movements, battlefield tactics and other communications crucial to the war’s ultimate outcome. The code stumped Japanese military cryptologists.

    The Code Talkers participated in all assaults the Marines led in the Pacific from 1942 to 1945 and are credited with helping the U.S. win the war. Hundreds of Native Americans from more than 20 tribes also served as code talkers during World War I and World War II, according to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian. Among them were Choctaw, Cherokee, Osage, Chippewa and Hopi speakers.

    Among those alarmed to hear of the missing Navajo Code Talker webpages was Peter MacDonald, 96. He and Thomas H. Begay are the only two Navajo Code Talkers still living today.

    “That code became a very valuable weapon and not only saved hundreds of thousands of soldiers, but it also helped win the war in the Pacific,” MacDonald said by phone from his home in Tuba City in the Arizona portion of the Navajo Nation. “And it has absolutely nothing to do with DEI.”

    A Republican who voted for Trump, MacDonald said he thinks the current administration needs to better walk the line between getting rid of DEI and ignoring history.

    “That’s why I’m very concerned that communication from the Pentagon down to the various military units should be taught or learn that this information is history, and you don’t want to hide history,” MacDonald said.

    The Defense Department has had to issue reassurances that it is not omitting historic achievements by servicemen and women of color. Besides the Code Talkers, the agency also on Wednesday restored a webpage describing baseball and civil rights icon Jackie Robinson’s military service after it was missing earlier in the day. Last week, pages honoring a Black Medal of Honor winner and Japanese American service members were also restored.

    “Everyone at the Defense Department loves Jackie Robinson, as well as the Navajo Code Talkers, the Tuskegee airmen, the Marines at Iwo Jima and so many others — we salute them for their strong and in many cases heroic service to our country, full stop,” Ullyot said. “We do not view or highlight them through the prism of immutable characteristics, such as race, ethnicity or sex.”

    Michael Smith, whose father, Samuel “Jesse” Smith Sr., was a Navajo Code Talker, questioned why these pages were removed at all.

    “I don’t know how taking Navajo Code Talkers off the Department of Defense website is saving the United States any money because that’s not consistent with the president’s order,” said Smith, who helps organize annual celebrations of the Code Talkers.

    Gov. Stephen Roe Lewis of the Gila River Indian Community in Arizona also expressed disappointment, claiming there was missing content relating to all Native American veterans, including Ira Hayes. Hayes was an enrolled member of the tribe and one of six Marines featured in an iconic 1945 Associated Press photograph of U.S. forces raising an American flag during the Battle of Iwo Jima.

    Even with some being reposted, he remains worried web content removal is “the tip of the iceberg.”

    “The way it looks in the (executive) order, this language is skewed and made to sound like the diversity programs are the ones that are unethical,” Smith said.

  • Pentagon restores histories of Navajo Code Talkers, other Native veterans after public outcry

    Pentagon restores histories of Navajo Code Talkers, other Native veterans after public outcry

    PHOENIX (AP) — The Pentagon restored some webpages highlighting the crucial wartime contributions of Navajo Code Talkers and other Native American veterans on Wednesday, days after tribes condemned the action.

    The initial removal was part of a sweep of any military content that promoted diversity, equity and inclusion, or commonly referred to as DEI. Following President Donald Trump’s broader executive order ending the federal government’s DEI programs, the Defense Department deleted thousands of pages honoring contributions by women and minority groups. Department officials say the Navajo Code Talker material was erroneously erased.

    “In the rare cases that content is removed — either deliberately or by mistake — that is out of the clearly outlined scope of the directive, we instruct the components and they correct the content so it recognizes our heroes for their dedicated service alongside their fellow Americans, period,” Pentagon press secretary John Ullyot said in a statement.

    Several webpages on the Code Talkers landed on a “404 – Page not found” message Tuesday. Some were back up Wednesday — although any that also mention Native American Heritage Month remain down. Thousands of other pages deleted in the DEI purge are still offline.

    White House officials informed the Navajo Nation that an artificial intelligence-powered automated review process looking for content with DEI initiatives led to the elimination of anything mentioning “Navajo,” according to a statement from Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren.

    Nygren, who sent a letter to the Defense Department requesting clarity on the issue, said he’s pleased by the resolution.

    “I want to assure the Navajo people that we remain in close communication with federal officials to ensure the legacy of our cherished Navajo Code Talkers is never erased from American and Navajo history,” Nygren said.

    He also pointed out the 574 federally recognized tribes across the U.S. are sovereign nations and not defined by DEI classifications, a stance broadly supported by other Native American leaders who also sent letters to the Trump administration.

    The U.S. Marine Corps initially recruited 29 Navajo men to develop a code based on the unwritten Navajo language in World War II. Using Navajo words for red soil, war chief, clan, braided hair, beads, ant and hummingbird, for example, they came up with a glossary of more than 200 terms, later expanded, and an alphabet. To convey the word “send,” Code Talkers would say the Navajo words for “sheep, eyes, nose and deer.”

    Hundreds of Navajos followed in their footsteps, sending thousands of messages without error on Japanese troop movements, battlefield tactics and other communications crucial to the war’s ultimate outcome. The code stumped Japanese military cryptologists.

    The Code Talkers participated in all assaults the Marines led in the Pacific from 1942 to 1945 and are credited with helping the U.S. win the war. Hundreds of Native Americans from more than 20 tribes also served as code talkers during World War I and World War II, according to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian. Among them were Choctaw, Cherokee, Osage, Chippewa and Hopi speakers.

    Among those alarmed to hear of the missing Navajo Code Talker webpages was Peter MacDonald, 96. He and Thomas H. Begay are the only two Navajo Code Talkers still living today.

    “That code became a very valuable weapon and not only saved hundreds of thousands of soldiers, but it also helped win the war in the Pacific,” MacDonald said by phone from his home in Tuba City in the Arizona portion of the Navajo Nation. “And it has absolutely nothing to do with DEI.”

    A Republican who voted for Trump, MacDonald said he thinks the current administration needs to better walk the line between getting rid of DEI and ignoring history.

    “That’s why I’m very concerned that communication from the Pentagon down to the various military units should be taught or learn that this information is history, and you don’t want to hide history,” MacDonald said.

    The Defense Department has had to issue reassurances that it is not omitting historic achievements by servicemen and women of color. Besides the Code Talkers, the agency also on Wednesday restored a webpage describing baseball and civil rights icon Jackie Robinson’s military service after it was missing earlier in the day. Last week, pages honoring a Black Medal of Honor winner and Japanese American service members were also restored.

    “Everyone at the Defense Department loves Jackie Robinson, as well as the Navajo Code Talkers, the Tuskegee airmen, the Marines at Iwo Jima and so many others — we salute them for their strong and in many cases heroic service to our country, full stop,” Ullyot said. “We do not view or highlight them through the prism of immutable characteristics, such as race, ethnicity or sex.”

    Michael Smith, whose father, Samuel “Jesse” Smith Sr., was a Navajo Code Talker, questioned why these pages were removed at all.

    “I don’t know how taking Navajo Code Talkers off the Department of Defense website is saving the United States any money because that’s not consistent with the president’s order,” said Smith, who helps organize annual celebrations of the Code Talkers.

    Gov. Stephen Roe Lewis of the Gila River Indian Community in Arizona also expressed disappointment, claiming there was missing content relating to all Native American veterans, including Ira Hayes. Hayes was an enrolled member of the tribe and one of six Marines featured in an iconic 1945 Associated Press photograph of U.S. forces raising an American flag during the Battle of Iwo Jima.

    Even with some being reposted, he remains worried web content removal is “the tip of the iceberg.”

    “The way it looks in the (executive) order, this language is skewed and made to sound like the diversity programs are the ones that are unethical,” Smith said.