Blog

Munich’s iconic Allianz Arena is about to witness an extraordinary fusion of rock and football this spring, as Linkin Park prepares to shake the foundations of the Champions League final between Paris Saint-Germain and Inter Milan.

The nu-metal legends — emerging from the shadows after seven years — aren’t just showing up to play. They’re reimagining their classic “Numb” in a way that captures football’s raw essence. Mike Shinoda, the band’s creative force, has crafted something that might just give viewers goosebumps on May 31.

“We’ve built this around the pure sounds of the game,” Shinoda shared with UEFA, his eyes lighting up. “The thud of boot meeting ball, that swoosh of the net, thousands of fans creating thunder in the stands — these are the moments that give you chills at a match.”

There’s something beautifully fitting about Linkin Park’s presence at this final. After weathering the heartbreaking loss of Chester Bennington in 2017, they’ve found new voice through Emily Armstrong of Dead Sara. Their latest album “From Zero” didn’t just top Billboard’s rock charts — it proved that reinvention doesn’t mean losing your soul.

The Allianz Arena holds its own stories of redemption. Cast your mind back to 1997, when the old Olympiastadion hosted an unlikely hero. Paul Lambert, fresh from Scottish football, wrote himself into Champions League folklore by putting the shackles on Zinedine Zidane. Borussia Dortmund shocked Juventus that night, and Lambert’s performance? Pure masterclass.

“Zidane was like smoke — he’d drift away from the ball, trying to pull you out of position,” Lambert recalled, a hint of pride still evident in his voice. “But I’d learned that watching the ball was a trap. The real danger was always Zidane himself.”

Dave Farrell, Linkin Park’s bassist and devoted football dad, sees the beautiful game’s American evolution firsthand. Between coaching his daughters and watching the sport’s explosive growth stateside, he’s witnessed a sea change. “Messi landing in Miami? That’s changed everything,” Farrell notes. “The ceiling for football in the States? We haven’t even scratched the surface.”

As Munich gears up for another historic night, there’s something almost poetic about rock royalty meeting football nobility. When Linkin Park takes the stage, they’ll add their own chapter to the stadium’s rich Champions League story — where legends are forged in both spotlight and studs, where raw emotion meets pure athletic brilliance.

Some nights just feel different. May 31 at the Allianz Arena? That promises to be one of them.

Rainbow flags will soon flutter across American cities, but this year’s Pride celebrations carry an extra spark of defiance. As 2024’s festivities approach, the LGBTQ+ community faces both unprecedented challenges and remarkable opportunities for connection.

Detroit’s Motor City Pride stands ready to welcome more than 65,000 attendees to Hart Plaza — a number that might well surge higher, given the current political climate. “People are feeling an urgent need to show up for each other,” says event chair Dave Wait, his voice carrying a mix of determination and hope. “The rhetoric we’re hearing nationwide? That’s exactly why we’re expecting record crowds.”

Sure, the atmosphere feels different this time around. Security measures have been beefed up, and organizers aren’t shy about acknowledging the reasons why. Yet there’s something powerful in how communities are responding to pressure — not by stepping back, but by pushing forward with expanded vendor spaces and richer historical exhibitions.

The timing couldn’t be more fitting for fresh perspectives on pioneering activists. Take Tourmaline’s newly published biography of Marsha P. Johnson, landing just as debates about gender-affirming care echo Johnson’s own battles from the 1970s. Some fights, it seems, refuse to stay in history books.

Metro Detroit’s Pride calendar stretches like a rainbow itself, spanning from late May clear through September. Each event adds its own shade to the spectrum — from Ferndale Pride’s free festival (featuring the legendary DJ Stacey “Hotwaxx” Hale) to Warren Pride’s family-focused gatherings. These aren’t just parties; they’re proof that Pride refuses to fit anyone’s narrow definition.

What’s particularly striking about 2024’s celebrations? The sheer variety. Golf tournaments share the calendar with rooftop parties. Corporate sponsors march alongside grassroots activists. Motor City Pride’s parade has become a testament to how far support for equality has spread throughout southeastern Michigan — though plenty would argue there’s still miles to go.

Hotter Than July’s approach to its 30th anniversary serves as a powerful reminder of Detroit’s Black LGBTQ+ community’s endurance and vitality. Three decades of celebration and resistance, proving that Pride’s evolution from protest to party hasn’t dulled its political edge.

Yet even as the festivities gear up, recent legislative challenges cast long shadows. The House passage of bills threatening trans healthcare access feels like a step backward — or maybe a reminder that progress rarely moves in straight lines.

Perhaps that’s what makes Pride 2024 feel so vital. In challenging times, joy becomes its own form of resistance. From Hart Plaza to Palmer Park, these gatherings aren’t just celebrations — they’re declarations that community itself is revolutionary. Sometimes, simply showing up for each other becomes the most powerful statement of all.

Remember when TVs were just… TVs? Those days feel like ancient history now. Walk into any electronics store in 2025, and you’ll find yourself facing walls of sophisticated digital command centers masquerading as simple screens. Yet here’s the kicker — most of us are barely scratching the surface of what these gleaming technological marvels can actually do.

Let’s get real for a moment. That fancy smart TV you dropped a small fortune on (probably during last year’s Black Friday madness) isn’t just collecting dust as a glorified Netflix machine. Well, actually, it might be — and that’s exactly the problem.

“When you buy a smart TV, you’re investing in our entertainment future,” trumpets one manufacturer’s marketing spiel. Sure, it sounds like typical corporate fluff, but they’ve accidentally stumbled onto something true. These aren’t just passive screens anymore; they’re sophisticated computing powerhouses that happen to show The Last of Us.

Take Samsung’s latest lineup — particularly that sleek Frame Pro with its Neo QLED display and 144Hz refresh rate. Beautiful piece of tech, absolutely. But here’s where things get messy: plenty of users leave features like Brightness Optimization enabled, then wonder why their $3,000 TV looks worse than their neighbor’s budget model during movie night.

“Practically blinded” — that’s how one user described their experience with automated settings gone haywire. It’s a classic case of technology outsmarting itself, like having a PhD student handle your grocery shopping. Sometimes simpler really is better.

Then there’s the whole HDMI versus DisplayPort debate. While HDMI remains king of the living room (thanks, convenience), DisplayPort enthusiasts make some compelling arguments. “You wouldn’t buy a sports car and put slow tires on it, would you?” Fair point, especially now that cloud gaming and 8K streaming are becoming mainstream.

But perhaps the most underutilized aspects of modern smart TVs are their auxiliary features. Voice control capabilities have evolved way beyond basic commands — they’re now proper digital assistants that can manage your smart home, track your Amazon deliveries, or remind you about that dentist appointment you’re probably trying to forget.

The audio situation deserves special attention. Modern TVs pack sophisticated sound processing that would make audio engineers from a decade ago weep with joy. Sports mode? It’ll make your living room sound like you’re at the Super Bowl. Movie mode? Those explosion sequences in the latest Marvel flick will rattle your neighbor’s china cabinet.

Speaking of movies — let’s talk about “Filmmaker mode.” It’s basically the holy grail for cinema purists, stripping away all those artificial enhancements to show content exactly as directors intended. Finding it in your TV’s settings menu, though? That’s an adventure worthy of Indiana Jones.

Here’s the real irony of our current situation: as TVs transform from passive screens into active lifestyle hubs, many of their best features remain hidden in plain sight, like Easter eggs in a video game nobody bothers to find.

Maybe it’s time to stop treating these sophisticated devices like simple screens and start exploring what they can really do. After all, they’re often the most expensive gadgets in our homes (besides that robot vacuum that keeps getting stuck under the couch). Shouldn’t we make them earn their keep?

The future of home entertainment is already here — it’s just buried in your TV’s settings menu, waiting to be discovered.

Amazon Prime Video’s latest hit “The Best Sisters” perfectly highlights the platform’s peculiar identity crisis. While viewers binge-watch this deliciously twisty thriller into the wee hours (who needs sleep anyway?), they’re simultaneously wrestling with an increasingly labyrinthine streaming service that seems determined to test their patience.

Let’s talk about that show first. “The Best Sisters” has shot to #2 in the UK charts, proving that Prime Video hasn’t lost its content mojo. The series serves up exactly what you’d want from a psychological thriller — smart writing, gorgeous production values, and performances that’ll keep you glued to your screen. When viewers start confessing to pulling all-nighters just to reach that apparently mind-bending finale, you know something’s clicking.

But here’s where things get messy — and not in the fun, plot-twist kind of way.

Prime Video’s interface has evolved (or perhaps devolved) into something resembling a digital bazaar where every click feels like a game of Russian roulette. Will this show be included in your subscription? Require an extra rental fee? Demand you sign up for yet another channel? Who knows! It’s like trying to navigate a maze where someone keeps moving the walls.

The timing couldn’t be more ironic. Just as “The Best Sisters” draws viewers in with its tale of complicated relationships and trust issues, Prime Video seems dead set on complicating its own relationship with subscribers. The platform’s 2024 decision to introduce ads unless viewers shell out extra cash felt particularly tone-deaf — especially considering Prime Video was long touted as a premium perk of that not-exactly-cheap Prime membership.

Remember when streaming services were supposed to simplify our viewing experience? Those were the days.

The contrast between content and delivery system has become almost comical. While “The Best Sisters” keeps viewers guessing with clever plot twists, the platform itself has become an unwanted mystery box. Nobody tunes in for a Friday night thriller expecting to decode whether they’re allowed to watch it without opening their wallet… again.

Sure, other streaming services have their quirks. Netflix keeps canceling shows faster than most people cancel gym memberships, and Disney+ seems to think everything needs a spin-off series. But Prime Video’s current strategy — turning what should be a straightforward streaming service into a digital shopping mall — risks alienating even its most devoted viewers.

Looking ahead to 2025, as streaming wars continue heating up and viewers become increasingly selective with their entertainment budgets, Prime Video stands at a crossroads. The success of shows like “The Best Sisters” demonstrates the platform’s capability to deliver compelling content. But unless Amazon remembers that a streaming service should actually, you know, help people stream things, even the most gripping content risks getting lost in the commercial shuffle.

Perhaps it’s time for Prime Video to take a page from its own hit show — less family drama, more family values. After all, shouldn’t a platform’s relationship with its viewers be built on trust rather than tests of patience?

Hollywood’s gothic romance machine is churning out something deliciously different this time around. Guillermo del Toro’s “Frankenstein” adaptation has sparked an electric current through Tinseltown’s corridors — and not just because of its monster-sized casting announcements.

Picture this: Jacob Elordi, fresh from his Elvis-adjacent triumph in “Priscilla,” trading his pompadour for prosthetics as literature’s most misunderstood creature. Opposite him? The eternally magnetic Oscar Isaac wielding a scalpel and sporting what sources say is a rather fetching period waistcoat as Victor Frankenstein. Now that’s what you’d call inspired casting.

Del Toro — bless his monster-loving heart — isn’t exactly known for playing things safe. At Cannes 2025, between sips of what looked suspiciously like a very expensive bordeaux, he dropped quite the bombshell: “I’m not doing a horror movie — ever.” Rather, this particular creation is shaping up to be something far more intriguing: a meditation on fathers, sons, and the messy business of playing God.

The path to production hasn’t exactly been smooth sailing. Andrew Garfield was originally set to don the creature’s presumably elaborate makeup before scheduling conflicts forced a reshuffling of the deck. In what might be the most gracious Hollywood pivot since… well, ever, Garfield told Deadline he was “very, very glad” about Elordi stepping into the role. Something about Elordi “needing that experience more.” Imagine that — actual civility in Hollywood. Perhaps the apocalypse really is upon us.

Speaking of unexpected twists, del Toro’s preparation methods continue to raise eyebrows in the most delightful ways. He gifted Elordi a baby development book at the start of filming — because apparently, learning to walk like a newborn creature requires some rather specific research. It’s exactly this kind of wonderfully weird attention to detail that sets del Toro’s projects apart from the usual monster-movie fare.

The production’s found its home in Aberdeen, Scotland, where the gothic atmosphere practically seeps from the stones. Del Toro, ever the poet, mused to Vanity Fair about the beauty of ruins and decay — though one suspects the local tourist board might have preferred slightly less romantic descriptions of their fair city.

Netflix continues its passionate courtship of del Toro, following the Oscar-winning “Pinocchio” and the deliciously macabre “Cabinet of Curiosities.” With Mia Goth and Christoph Waltz rounding out the ensemble (and honestly, has Waltz ever not elevated everything he’s touched?), this particular monster mash is shaping up to be something rather special.

Mark those calendars, darlings — this isn’t just another creature feature. It’s del Toro doing what he does best: turning the grotesque into something unexpectedly beautiful. Though perhaps leave the baby development books at home for this particular Netflix evening.

Fall 2024’s streaming landscape is about to get deliciously complicated. Two heavyweight series just dropped their return dates, though the announcements couldn’t be more different in tone — one tinged with heartbreak, the other wrapped in nostalgic farewell ribbons.

Let’s talk about “Gen V” first. Amazon’s gleefully twisted superhero series returns September 17th, but there’s an elephant in the room that can’t — and shouldn’t — be ignored. The tragic loss of Chance Perdomo this past March cast a long shadow over production. Rather than taking the easy route with a recast, the creative team made the gutsy choice to weave this real-world loss into the show’s fabric. Sean Patrick Thomas, as Andre’s father Polarity, carries this emotional weight in the first trailer, demanding answers about his son’s fate — art and life colliding in ways nobody could have predicted.

The sophomore season drops into a powder keg of tension. With Homelander’s iron-fisted regime tightening its grip on America (sound familiar?), the series looks ready to double down on its signature blend of campus drama and superhero mayhem. Mark your calendars for weekly doses of chaos through October 22nd.

Meanwhile, in a parallel universe called Hawkins, Indiana…

“Stranger Things” is preparing its grand finale, and Netflix isn’t taking any half measures. They’re splitting Season 5 into three holiday-season chunks — November 26th, Christmas Day, and New Year’s Eve. Pretty clever timing, considering how the show’s always been perfect winter-break binge material.

The cast is getting sentimental, and honestly, who can blame them? Maya Hawke summed it up perfectly when she told PEOPLE it’s been “heartbreaking” — though that’s what happens when you’ve practically grown up on camera. Set in fall ’87 (their biggest time jump yet), the final season’s bringing the whole gang back: Millie Bobby Brown, Winona Ryder, David Harbour, and — wait for it — Linda Hamilton. Because nothing says ’80s quite like adding a genuine Terminator icon to your roster.

Finn Wolfhard’s been dropping hints about “film-length” episodes, which probably means we should stock up on snacks. Lots of snacks.

What’s fascinating here is how these two shows represent completely different faces of modern TV. “Gen V” gleefully rips into superhero tropes with razor-sharp teeth, while “Stranger Things” wraps us in a cozy blanket of nostalgia (albeit one with interdimensional monsters). Their simultaneous announcements feel like a perfect snapshot of where streaming stands in 2024 — equal parts innovation and comfort food.

As autumn approaches, we’re watching one series navigate unthinkable tragedy while another prepares to close the book on a genuine phenomenon. Whatever your streaming poison, one thing’s crystal clear: fall 2024 is shaping up to be television’s season of extremes.

Manhattan’s emptiest hours — those surreal days of 2020 when the city that never sleeps took an unprecedented nap — have found new life in “Dark Honor,” a noir series that transforms pandemic-era New York into something unexpectedly compelling. Who’d have thought those haunting, vacant streets would make such perfect fodder for crime fiction?

The five-issue Image Comics miniseries feels almost prophetic now in 2025, especially given its gambling subplot (anyone else noticed how those betting apps have practically taken over every commercial break lately?). But what’s truly remarkable is how it manages to walk the delicate line between entertainment and respect for recent history.

“It was so unknown. It was life-threatening,” recalls filmmaker Brian DeCubellis, whose original screenplay morphed into this graphic venture. The creative team — including writer K.S. Bruce and comic veteran Ethan Sacks — didn’t just want another pandemic story. They wanted something different. Something that captured that peculiar moment when even Grand Central Terminal stood eerily empty, its usual bustle replaced by ghostly silence.

Here’s where things get interesting. Rather than stick to a single artistic vision, “Dark Honor” employs four distinct artists: Fico Ossio, David Messina, Gabriel Guzman, and Jamal Igle. Risky? Sure. But like New York itself, the variety works — each artist bringing their own flavor while maintaining the story’s noir heartbeat.

The plot’s pretty straightforward on paper: ex-con with a gambling problem (seriously, though — how prescient is that given today’s sports betting mania?) gets caught up in pandemic-era criminal shenanigans. But it’s the execution that elevates it beyond typical crime fare. The empty city becomes more than backdrop; it’s practically a character itself, brooding and dangerous in ways that feel completely different from the New York we know today, with its returned tourists and trademark chaos.

DeCubellis and team showed remarkable restraint in handling the pandemic element. “We wanted to be very respectful,” he explains, acknowledging the real human toll that continues to shape our world. It’s refreshing to see creators who understand the weight of recent history while still managing to craft engaging entertainment.

The decision to shift from film to comics wasn’t just practical — it was inspired. “We just put it on the shelf,” DeCubellis says of the original screenplay, demonstrating the kind of adaptability that’s kept New York’s creative spirit alive through countless challenges. In a city where Broadway shows pack in millions annually and the Met Opera still sets global standards (despite those recent union disputes), “Dark Honor” carves out its own unique space.

Each issue brings something fresh to the table. The rotating artist roster could’ve been a mess, but instead it works like a kaleidoscope — turning and shifting to reveal new aspects of the story, much like how different neighborhoods show you different sides of New York. As DeCubellis notes, “Seeing the story get interpreted through their artistic lens… I think was the biggest surprise.”

The series serves double duty: it’s both a gripping noir tale and an accidental time capsule. Those empty streets we’d rather forget? They’re preserved here, transformed into something meaningful rather than just tragic. It’s a reminder of how art can take our collective trauma and reshape it into something that helps us process, understand, and maybe even heal.

Looking at it now, with Manhattan’s streets back to their familiar chaos (and then some — thanks to those new pedestrian zones), “Dark Honor” feels like a snapshot of a moment we never thought we’d see. It’s proof that even in New York’s darkest hours, creativity finds a way to shine through the shadows. Sometimes it just needs a different canvas to tell its story.

Talk about dramatic timing. Just as George Shuttleworth was about to get down on one knee at the Rovers Return, who should walk in but Jason Grimshaw — suitcase in hand, sporting that trademark grin, and dropping the most on-brand line possible: “The rover returns.”

The return of Jason (played by Ryan Thomas) to Coronation Street’s cobbled streets couldn’t have been more perfectly orchestrated if the writers had planned it for months. Which, come to think of it, they probably did. After hanging up his builder’s boots back in 2016 for the sunny shores of Thailand, Jason’s unexpected homecoming has thrown more than just George’s proposal plans into disarray.

Here’s the thing about Jason’s return, though — it’s not exactly the triumphant homecoming one might expect. Thomas himself admits his character’s motives are more complicated than a simple family visit. “He’s skint, girlfriend-less, and basically needs his mum,” Thomas revealed during a recent press junket. Rather fitting for 2025, when the cost-of-living crisis has sent more than a few adults scurrying back to the family nest.

The timing feels particularly poignant given Sue Cleaver’s upcoming departure from the show. After 25 years of bringing Eileen Grimshaw to life (and what a life it’s been), Cleaver’s decision to step away from the cobbles marks the end of an era. “The door is still firmly open,” she’s said, though her plans to “live fearlessly” at 60 sound suspiciously like someone who’s been binge-watching those trendy midlife crisis documentaries on Netflix.

Meanwhile, the street’s other dramas haven’t exactly pressed pause for Jason’s return. Abi Webster’s dealing with an increasingly persistent admirer (mate, take the hint), and Dee-Dee Bailey’s world’s been turned upside down faster than you can say “unexpected plot twist.” But it’s the Grimshaw family saga that’s got everyone talking — especially since Jason’s dropped his bombshell proposal about whisking his mum off to Thailand as his business partner.

For Thomas, stepping back onto those familiar cobbles clearly stirred up some emotions. “That place will always have my respect,” he reflected, sounding like someone who’s just found their old school yearbook. “They taught me everything I know.” Well, almost everything — presumably Thailand taught him a thing or two about proper sun cream application.

The upcoming episodes promise to deliver exactly what Coronation Street does best: family drama served with a side of wit, a dash of tears, and enough plot twists to keep viewers glued to their screens. As Eileen’s potential exit story unfolds, one thing’s certain — the Grimshaw family drama is about to give those reality dating shows a run for their money in the entertainment stakes.

And George? Well, he might want to hold onto that ring for now. Something says his perfectly planned proposal might need a slight rewrite.

Hollywood’s luminous constellation dimmed ever so slightly this week as television pioneer Loretta Swit — the incomparable force behind M*A*S*H’s Margaret “Hot Lips” Houlihan — took her final bow at 87. Her passing in her beloved New York City home marks more than just the end of an era; it’s the closing curtain on a transformative chapter in television’s evolution from mere entertainment to cultural zeitgeist.

Darlings, this wasn’t just any television star we’re talking about — this was Loretta Swit, the woman who turned a one-note character into an eleven-season masterclass in feminist representation. And honey, she did it while wearing army fatigues, no less.

Born to Polish immigrants in Passaic, New Jersey (hardly the stuff of Hollywood dreams), Swit’s trajectory from aspiring thespian to small-screen royalty reads like a delicious script that even the most seasoned writers couldn’t have penned better. “I always wanted to be an actress,” she once confided — and oh, what an understatement that turned out to be.

Let’s dish about her crowning achievement, shall we? Where Sally Kellerman’s film version of Hot Lips played like a B-movie fantasy (Swit’s own wickedly accurate description: “sex-crazed bimbo”), our girl Loretta wasn’t having any of that nonsense. By season three, she’d transformed Margaret Houlihan into something television desperately needed but rarely delivered: a fully realized woman in uniform.

The behind-the-scenes tea is even more delicious. Producer Burt Metcalfe couldn’t help but marvel at Swit’s “dogged determination” to evolve the character. Her creative partnership with Alan Alda? Pure magic, darling. “I think of Alan as a teacher,” Swit once reflected, in what might be the most elegant acknowledgment of male allyship we’ve seen in the industry.

Here’s the gag — Swit’s influence rippled far beyond the soundstage. “I still get letters from women all over the world who became nurses because of Margaret Houlihan,” she shared just last year. Now that’s what we call impact, sweeties. In today’s era of carefully curated influence, there’s something absolutely divine about that kind of authentic inspiration.

M*A*S*H’s writers room? Heaven for an actor of Swit’s caliber. “You can’t help but get better as an actor working with scripts like that,” she once dished to The Florida Times-Union. The tea? They don’t write them like that anymore, dolls.

But wait — there’s more to this icon than just the 4077th. Swit nearly snatched the role of Chris Cagney in “Cagney & Lacey’s” pilot film (imagine that alternate universe, would you?). Post-M*A*S*H, she strutted her stuff on Broadway in “The Mystery of Edwin Drood,” proving that true talent simply cannot be contained to one medium.

In her later years, Swit channeled her passionate spirit into animal welfare activism, because icons never really retire — they just find new stages to conquer. Her marriage to actor Dennis Holahan (a M*A*S*H guest star, naturally) lasted from 1983 to 1995, proving that sometimes the best romance happens between takes.

As we navigate television’s current golden age (or is it platinum by now?), Swit’s contribution to the medium feels more relevant than ever. She didn’t just play a role — she revolutionized it, fought for it, and honey, she won. Like her character’s touching farewell speech to her nurses — which Swit herself penned, because of course she did — her legacy remains “an honor and privilege” to witness.

And that, darlings, is how you leave a mark on Hollywood that not even time can fade.

Hollywood’s latest power move has set the industry buzzing, and darlings, it’s absolutely delicious. The sequel to “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” isn’t just happening—it’s evolving into something far more intriguing than anyone could have imagined. Netflix (fresh off its 2025 acquisition spree) has managed to snag both Brad Pitt and director David Fincher for this unexpected continuation, proving that streaming giants can still pull off the impossible.

Let’s dish about the cast, shall we?

Brad Pitt—eternally radiant and somehow aging backward like some sort of Benjamin Button fever dream—returns as Cliff Booth, the role that snagged him that long-overdue Oscar. But here’s where things get particularly juicy: Elizabeth Debicki, fresh from her masterclass in restrained elegance as Princess Diana, is joining the ensemble. So is Scott Caan, in what feels like a perfectly timed reunion with his former Ocean’s co-star.

The whole affair reads like a particularly clever game of Hollywood musical chairs. Quentin Tarantino—who’d initially considered this sequel for his swan song—handed the reins to Fincher. Word around Chateau Marmont suggests Pitt’s gentle nudging might have influenced this changing of the guard. Rather fitting, considering how seamlessly Fincher and Pitt’s previous collaborations have melded—from the nihilistic punch of “Fight Club” to “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button’s” ethereal meditation on time.

Speaking of time—the sequel’s setting remains more closely guarded than the latest A24 script. While the original basked in the sunset glow of 1969’s Hollywood, this follow-up presumably ventures into darker territory. Perhaps the gritty glamour of the ’70s? The cocaine-dusted excess of the ’80s? The possibilities are deliciously endless.

Production kicks off this July in California, though Netflix maintains their trademark sphinx-like silence on official details. Whispers from deep within the industry hint at plot elements involving a decidedly unconventional cocktail lounge-meets-mud wrestling establishment. Another thread supposedly follows a trophy wife character—though in Fincher’s hands, one suspects any such role would subvert expectations rather spectacularly.

For Debicki, this role adds another gleaming facet to her already impressive repertoire. The actress has proven herself equally at home in Marvel’s cosmic playground as in Nolan’s temporal gymnastics. Meanwhile, Caan’s return to Pitt’s orbit feels like catching up with old friends at Musso & Frank—comfortable yet charged with possibility.

The original film served as Tarantino’s sun-drenched valentine to an era. Now, with Fincher’s precisely calibrated lens focused on this world, we’re likely in for something altogether different—trading those golden-hour shots for something more akin to sodium-vapor-lit noir. His notorious perfectionism (still legendary after that 2024 project that reportedly took 200 takes for a single scene) might just be exactly what this continuation needs.

In an era where sequels often feel as mass-produced as celebrity skincare lines, this project stands apart. It’s not merely chasing nostalgia—it’s pursuing something far more ambitious. With this level of talent both behind and before the camera, we might just be witnessing the birth of that rarest of Hollywood creatures: a sequel that outshines its predecessor.

Now wouldn’t that be something?