Blog

The neon lights of Nectar’s, a cornerstone of Burlington’s music scene for half a century, have finally gone dark. In an era where streaming dominates and mega-venues rule the concert landscape, the closure of this humble Vermont institution feels particularly poignant — like watching the final notes fade from a beloved song.

Started by Greek immigrant Nectar Rorris back in ’75, the venue’s story reads like a classic American tale. Rorris, now pushing 87, remembers scraping together loans from family to open what would become a legendary music spot. “They borrowed money from their parents. I did the same and we closed the deal,” he recalls, his voice still carrying traces of pride mixed with nostalgia.

But let’s talk about Phish. Because you can’t tell the story of Nectar’s without mentioning the band that turned this modest Burlington joint into hallowed ground for jam band devotees. During their early-80s residency, Phish developed their signature sound within these brick walls — a creative evolution that would eventually fill stadiums worldwide. The band’s gratitude runs deep; their 1992 album “A Picture of Nectar” stands as a permanent tribute to both the venue and its founder.

Metal Mondays. Dead Set Tuesdays. Blues nights that stretched into dawn. Nectar’s wasn’t just about one sound or scene — it was a musical laboratory where genres collided and new sounds emerged. Alex Budney, who started in the kitchen at 19 back in ’01, puts it perfectly: “We’d provide tools for bands to make it.” Simple as that.

The magic? It was in those impossible-to-replicate moments of connection. Take last September, when Phish’s Mike Gordon casually hopped onstage during Maggie Rose’s set for an impromptu jam. Or consider Rose herself, who deliberately rerouted her entire tour just to play there. “The lore of Nectar’s did not disappoint,” she says — and really, how could it?

From Grace Potter to B.B. King, from Anais Mitchell to countless local acts cutting their teeth on that storied stage, Nectar’s remained a sanctuary for live music even as Burlington evolved around it. But urban development and economic pressures proved relentless. Construction projects chipped away at foot traffic; costs kept climbing. By summer 2023, the writing was on the wall — first a “pause,” then the final curtain call.

Justin Remillard, who spent 25 years booking electronic acts at the venue, offers some perspective: “Fifty years is an amazing run for a nightclub. The only constant is change.” He’s right, of course. Yet as downtown Burlington enters 2025 without its musical heartbeat, the loss feels raw.

Sure, the physical space might become something else — perhaps another sleek bar or boutique shop. But Nectar’s legacy? That’s permanent. It’s in the countless musicians who found their voice there, in the community that formed around those legendary gravy fries and late-night jams, in the stories that’ll keep getting passed down about that little club in Vermont where magic happened nearly every night.

Sometimes the smallest stages create the biggest ripples. Nectar’s proved that for half a century — not bad for a dream that started with a borrowed loan and a whole lot of hope.

Love finds its way in mysterious paths — just ask Alexis Bellino and John Janssen, who recently celebrated their union against the dramatic backdrop of Laguna Beach’s coastline. The former Real Housewives of Orange County star and her beau exchanged vows on Friday, October 3, in what could only be described as a celebration that perfectly captured their defiant spirit.

The venue? A hidden gem transformed into what Bellino dubbed “a secret garden by the ocean.” Funny how sometimes the most beautiful things bloom in unexpected places. The celebration channeled what she called a “dreamy, romantic, rustic chic vibe with earthy elegance” — though honestly, those words barely scratch the surface of what guests experienced that day.

Perhaps the most talked-about element (besides the couple themselves) was Bellino’s unconventional choice of wedding attire. Breaking away from the traditional white dress playbook, she kept everyone guessing right up until the big day. “No one could have ever fathomed what I’m wearing,” she’d teased during an August chat with Us Weekly. The gown, discovered at Modern Bride in Scottsdale, carried such emotional weight that even discussing it brought tears to her eyes.

Their love story hasn’t exactly been a fairy tale — at least not the Disney kind. Starting in December 2023, their relationship raised more than a few eyebrows, particularly given Janssen’s previous connection to Shannon Beador (yeah, that Shannon from RHOC). But rather than hide away, they chose to face the music head-on, making their first red carpet appearance together at the DirecTV Oscars Viewing Party last March.

The road to “I do” became something of a celebration marathon. Between the “nearlyweds” bash in Vegas and a decidedly non-traditional bridal shower that brought together unlikely allies like Tamra Judge and Jo De La Rosa, the couple seemed determined to prove that joy trumps judgment every time.

Look, relationships in the public eye aren’t for the faint of heart. “To the haters,” as Bellino put it to Us Weekly, the journey hasn’t been easy. There were tears, sure — moments when they found themselves “crying, both of us, distraught” over the public’s reaction to their relationship. But here’s the thing about real love: it tends to have the last word.

The wedding itself? Pure celebration mode. As Bellino explained on the “I Do, Part 2” podcast (which, btw, has become quite the hit in early 2025), they wanted to focus on creating an unforgettable experience for their guests. Sometimes the best response to criticism is just to dance right through it.

When you strip away all the drama and the headlines, what emerges is pretty remarkable — a story about two people who chose love over convenience, authenticity over appearances. “If you can find love and still build on everything when you’re at rock bottom and the most hated and come out on top?” Bellino reflected. “That’s because it’s a real and true story.”

Sometimes the most powerful love stories are the ones that don’t follow the script. In Bellino and Janssen’s case, maybe that’s exactly what makes it worth telling.

The entertainment world still grapples with the shocking loss of Liam Payne — and now, Nicole Scherzinger’s recent revelation about their final exchange adds another layer of poignancy to the tragedy.

Speaking with The Times of London, Scherzinger shared details of what would unknowingly become their last conversation. The former X Factor judge — who helped assemble One Direction during the show’s pivotal 2010 season — described their final text exchange as remarkably mundane. “I’d known he was in Argentina. It was just chit-chat and pretty light,” she recalled, those ordinary messages now weighted with unexpected significance.

Last October’s news of Payne’s death in Buenos Aires sent ripples through the industry. The 31-year-old’s fatal hotel balcony fall, complicated by a toxic mixture of alcohol, cocaine, and prescription antidepressants, left colleagues and fans reeling. Perhaps none felt the loss more deeply than Scherzinger, who’d witnessed his journey from wide-eyed teenager to global phenomenon.

“I just adored Liam. He had such a good heart,” she reflected, her words carrying the warmth of someone who’d watched a protégé become a peer. Their professional paths had recently intersected again on Netflix’s “Building the Band” — now one of Payne’s final television appearances, premiering with a dedication to his memory.

The night of Payne’s passing found Scherzinger preparing for her role in Andrew Lloyd Webber’s “Sunset Boulevard.” Rather than canceling, she channeled her grief into art. “From then on, I dedicated a little part of the show to Liam every night. Just a little moment that always made me think of him” — a testament to entertainment’s oldest maxim that the show must go on.

Scherzinger’s perspective on the tragedy has evolved into a broader commentary on modern celebrity culture. “We need more compassion in the world,” she observed, adding with notable candor, “Our phones are our enemies as much as they help us. I wish we’d cancel cancel culture.” These words carry particular weight given her own recent social media controversies.

Their story — from talent show mentorship to final text messages — serves as a stark reminder of life’s unpredictability. In an industry often criticized for its superficiality, their connection reflected something deeper: the complex bonds formed when careers intertwine, when mentors become friends, and when ordinary moments become final farewells.

As the entertainment world moves forward into 2025, Scherzinger’s candid reflections offer a sobering perspective on fame’s darker undercurrents. Yet amid the loss, her focus remains steadfast on celebrating Payne’s legacy while advocating for a more empathetic industry — one that might better protect its own from the pressures that sometimes prove too heavy to bear.

Celebrity Culture’s Oddest Phenomenon: The Art of Hating Stars We’ve Never Met

Let’s face it — there’s something deliciously absurd about developing a fierce vendetta against a celebrity who doesn’t know you exist. Yet here we are in 2025, still gleefully participating in this peculiar pastime, now amplified by social media’s endless echo chambers.

The confessional nature of platforms like Reddit has turned these arbitrary antipathies into a fascinating cultural spectacle. Take the case of Keith Urban’s controversial coiffure. “His hair enrages me,” declared one particularly passionate critic. “I just want to buzz it off straight down the middle.” (Somewhere, a hairdresser is having heart palpitations.)

These grievances range from the sublimely ridiculous to the ridiculously sublime. Consider the person who’s harbored a years-long grudge against Gwyneth Paltrow because her handlers once demanded silence in her presence — talk about a “conscious uncoupling” from rational thought.

But here’s where things get interesting.

Sometimes these seemingly arbitrary dislikes mask deeper cultural critiques. The recent backlash against Ryan Reynolds — dubbed “contagiously unfunny” by critics — speaks volumes about our collective fatigue with certain celebrity archetypes. In an era where authenticity is currency, perhaps the carefully crafted persona feels a bit… stale?

The entertainment world, meanwhile, keeps serving up delightfully bizarre footnotes to this phenomenon. Barbra Streisand’s dog-cloning adventures (twice!) read like a plot from a sci-fi comedy. And who knew Dermot Mulroney moonlights as a professional cellist on major film scores? (Not the same as playing air guitar in “My Best Friend’s Wedding,” but equally impressive.)

Chris Pratt presents an particularly intriguing case study. “Seemed really likable until he started saying things that weren’t written by others” — ouch. That observation cuts deeper than any scripted dialogue ever could.

The justifications for these celebrity grudges often venture into gloriously absurd territory. Someone’s active avoidance of Zooey Deschanel extends so far they’ll skip watching “Elf” during the holidays. That’s commitment to a cause, albeit a questionably worthwhile one.

Speaking of commitment — what about those perfectly reasonable individuals who’ve declared war on Chris Martin’s apparently offensive t-shirt collection? Or the subset of viewers who can’t stand Henry Cavill’s face? (Superman’s kryptonite turns out to be inexplicable internet hatred. Who knew?)

In this age of endless streaming options and 24/7 celebrity coverage, these peculiar aversions have become part of our cultural DNA. They’re water-cooler conversations waiting to happen, social media threads ready to explode, and oddly comforting reminders of our shared human quirks.

After all, in a world where 78-year-old Cher dates a 39-year-old and NFL star Patrick Mahomes refuses to wash his lucky underwear (seriously, someone call the health department), maybe harboring an inexplicable hatred for Sabrina Carpenter’s bangs isn’t so weird after all.

Welcome to celebrity culture in 2025 — where the irrational becomes rational, and we’re all just living in this gloriously weird reality show together.

Hollywood’s most outrageous soap opera on wheels is suddenly pumping the brakes. The Fast & Furious franchise — that gloriously ridiculous spectacle that turned street racing into a multibillion-dollar phenomenon — has hit an unexpected speed bump that’s giving Universal Studios executives some serious heartburn.

Picture this: After burning through money faster than a nitrous-boosted Dodge Charger ($1.1 billion for the last three films alone), Universal’s attempting to rein in this runaway train. The studio’s drawing a hard line at $200 million for the franchise finale, while the current vision demands at least $250 million to execute properly. Darling, when even Hollywood starts clutching its pearls over the budget, you know something’s amiss.

The situation drips with delicious irony. What began as a modest tale about street racing and — in former Universal head Stacey Snider’s immortal words — “girls in short shorts” has morphed into a budget-devouring behemoth that literally sent cars into space. Speaking of that particular creative choice, Universal Chairperson Donna Langley recently delivered what might be 2025’s most memorable mea culpa: “I’m sorry we sent them into space. We can never get that genie back.”

But wait, there’s more drama in this Hollywood hedge maze. The finale lacks both a finished script and (gasp!) confirmed cast deals. Vin Diesel, who typically commands $25 million per outing just to flex those biceps and mumble about “family,” heads a star-studded ensemble whose combined paychecks could finance a small nation’s GDP.

Universal’s proposed belt-tightening measures read like a producer’s fever dream: fewer exotic locations, reduced screen time for certain cast members, and potential character eliminations. (Though honestly, after surviving explosions that would level small cities, what’s a little budget cut between family members?)

Producer Neal Moritz attempts diplomatic damage control: “The only thing we’re focused on is making this a satisfying finale both creatively and financially.” Translation: Someone’s about to learn that even in Hollywood, money doesn’t grow on palm trees.

The numbers tell a sobering story. Fast X’s $704 million global haul might sound impressive over cocktails at Chateau Marmont, but it represents the franchise’s weakest domestic showing since 2006. Factor in theaters keeping roughly half the ticket sales, and suddenly that figure looks about as sturdy as a paper-mache Ferrari.

Yet Universal isn’t ready to completely abandon their quarter-century-old golden goose. The studio’s already mapping out spin-off possibilities — including a live-action TV series and smaller-budget film projects. It’s rather like watching a luxury brand launch a diffusion line; same family name, less expensive packaging.

Vin Diesel’s optimistic April 2027 release date now feels shakier than a Hollywood marriage. The franchise that turned physics-defying stunts into performance art faces its greatest challenge yet: making Hollywood economics play nice with audience expectations. For a series that’s always preached about family, the most complicated relationship might just be the one between ambition and accounting.

Hollywood’s relationship with literature has always been… complicated. Like that couple everyone knows who can’t live with or without each other — passionate, explosive, and occasionally brilliant.

Take two wildly different tales of adaptation drama that perfectly capture this messy dance. Back in 1970, Western director Budd Boetticher watched in horror as his precious story morphed into “Two Mules for Sister Sara.” Meanwhile, here in 2025, Paul Thomas Anderson’s done the seemingly impossible — turning Thomas Pynchon’s mind-bending “Vineland” into box office gold with “One Battle After Another.”

The Boetticher story’s particularly juicy. Picture this: There he is at the Pantages Theater premiere, sitting next to actor Ron Ely, absolutely seething. He couldn’t help himself — “The stupidest S.O.B. in the theater was the leading man,” he spat, referring to Clint Eastwood. (And don’t even get him started on that whole “couldn’t he smell her breath?” thing.)

The morning after? Boetticher marched straight to his “dear friend” Don Siegel and delivered the kind of unvarnished criticism that’d give today’s PR teams collective anxiety: “Don, how could you make a piece of crap like that?”

But here’s where things get interesting. Flash forward to now, and P.T. Anderson’s somehow cracked the code that’s stumped Hollywood for decades. His $130 million gamble on Pynchon’s “Vineland” isn’t just working — it’s thriving.

The genius? Anderson’s realized something fundamental about adaptation: sometimes you gotta break a few eggs. He’s updated everything from war-on-drugs commentary to swapping joint-rolling for vape pens (because honestly, who rolls joints anymore in 2025?). Even the character names have evolved while keeping their distinctly Pynchonian weirdness.

UC Berkeley’s Professor Michael Mark Cohen nails it: “The fact that Bob uses a vape pen throughout instead of rolling joints… that’s not just modernization. It’s recognition that marijuana isn’t the boogeyman anymore — today’s political repression has found new targets in immigration policy.”

What’s truly fascinating is watching Leonardo DiCaprio and Sean Penn (particularly magnetic as the menacing Col. Steven J. Lockjaw) navigate this updated landscape. They’re not just performing — they’re translating Pynchon’s prose into something visceral and immediate.

The contrast between these two adaptation stories tells us something crucial about Hollywood’s evolution. While Boetticher’s vision got steamrolled (though let’s be real, “Two Mules” still made bank and has its defenders), Anderson’s approach shows how far we’ve come in understanding the delicate art of adaptation.

Maybe that’s the real lesson here. Sometimes the best way to honor a book isn’t to worship it — it’s to reimagine it entirely. As Anderson confessed to Spielberg over drinks at Chateau Marmont last month, “Loving a book too much can be dangerous when you’re adapting it. You’ve gotta be willing to get rough.”

With streaming platforms throwing money at every book adaptation they can get their hands on (seriously, did anyone ask for another “Pride & Prejudice” remake?), these contrasting tales offer a masterclass in what works — and what spectacularly doesn’t. Whether you’re a die-hard Pynchon fan or just someone who enjoys watching Hollywood navigate these treacherous waters, one thing’s crystal clear: sometimes the most faithful adaptation is the one that dares to be different.

Rock ‘n’ roll’s greatest comeback story has hit a sobering note. Oasis guitarist Paul ‘Bonehead’ Arthurs — whose return helped make the impossible reunion possible — is stepping back from the band’s triumphant tour to tackle another round with cancer.

The news dropped like a stone in still water. Bonehead revealed his prostate cancer diagnosis, which he’s been quietly managing throughout 2024, with the kind of understated grace that’s always marked his presence in one of rock’s most famously turbulent bands.

“The good news is I’m responding really well to treatment, which meant I could be part of this incredible tour,” he shared through social media. There’s something particularly poignant about his optimism, especially coming from someone who’s already danced with the devil — having beaten tonsil cancer at Manchester’s Christie NHS Foundation Trust just last year.

The timing stings. Several massive shows across Asia and Australia will have to soldier on without him — Seoul, Tokyo, Melbourne, Sydney. Yet in true rock spirit, Bonehead’s already got his compass pointed toward South America. “Feeling good,” he assures fans, promising to be back in fighting form for the next leg.

What makes this particularly gut-wrenching is how vital Bonehead’s been to Oasis’s phoenix-like rise from the ashes. After years of tabloid drama and brotherly feuds that would make even the Kardashians blush, the band’s reunion has been nothing short of extraordinary. The numbers tell their own story — fans from 158 countries scrambling for tickets, shattering box office records left and right.

Noel Gallagher said it best during their Cardiff show last summer: “If it wasn’t for him, none of this would have happened.” And he’s right. Before the champagne supernovas and wonderwalls, there was just Bonehead and Liam, grinding it out in their pre-Oasis outfit, The Rain. Some bonds run deeper than blood.

The band’s response to Bonehead’s announcement speaks volumes about the family they’ve become: “Wishing you all the best with your treatment Bonehead – we’ll see you back on stage in South America.” Simple words carrying the weight of decades.

As Oasis continues delivering those spine-tingling performances across the globe — those moments when 80,000 voices become one — they’re carrying more than just their musical legacy. They’re carrying the spirit of a man who helped build this house of sound from the ground up.

Perhaps there’s something fitting about Bonehead’s temporary exit and planned return mirroring Oasis’s own story — a tale of stepping away, fighting through, and coming back stronger. Behind every power chord and stadium anthem are real people facing real battles. And sometimes, the greatest comebacks happen off stage.

The music industry’s unpredictable nature revealed itself in stark contrast this week, as one ambitious venture crumbled while another soared to new heights. Sometimes the best-laid plans just don’t pan out — even for industry veterans like Trent Reznor.

The Future Ruins festival — whose name proved eerily prophetic — won’t be making its anticipated debut this November in Los Angeles. Nine Inch Nails frontman Reznor and his creative partner Atticus Ross pulled the plug on their innovative celebration of film music, citing those dreaded “logistical challenges” that have become all too familiar in the post-pandemic landscape.

What makes the cancellation particularly bitter? The festival’s lineup read like a dream team of Hollywood’s sonic wizards. John Carpenter, whose haunting synthesizers defined horror cinema. Danny Elfman, the mastermind behind countless Tim Burton dreamscapes. These weren’t just composers — they were storytellers who painted with sound.

“It’s about giving people who are, literally, the best in the world at taking audiences on an emotional ride via music the opportunity to tell new stories in an interesting live setting,” Reznor had explained back in May. A beautiful vision, sure — but sometimes reality has other plans.

Meanwhile, across the industry spectrum, British rock phenomenon Yungblud is living proof that traditional formats still pack a punch. His IDOLS world tour just announced a massive North American expansion for 2026, marking a leap into the big leagues of live performance.

“USA and Canada we ridin’ again,” the musician shared on Instagram with characteristic enthusiasm. “IM COMIN BACK. The biggest venues of my life here, arenas and RED ROCKS! WHAT??? This is insane.”

The 24-date extension kicks off at Michigan Liberty Amphitheatre on May 1, 2026 — right when festival season typically starts heating up. Fancy that timing. The tour will wind its way through prestigious venues like Red Rocks Amphitheatre (a bucket-list spot for any artist) and the iconic Radio City Music Hall, before wrapping up in Atlanta on June 13.

Here’s where things get interesting. While Yungblud gears up for this milestone tour, he’s also dropping a collaborative EP with Aerosmith — their first new music in over a decade. Talk about a torch-passing moment in rock history. Meanwhile, Reznor and Ross aren’t exactly crying in their coffee; they’re busy scoring the hotly anticipated Tron: Ares, proving there’s always another creative avenue to explore.

The contrast between these two stories speaks volumes about the state of live music heading into 2026. While innovative concepts like Future Ruins promise exciting possibilities, sometimes the tried-and-true concert format — even scaled up to arena size — proves more resilient than revolutionary ideas.

Maybe there’s a lesson here about ambition versus execution. Or perhaps it’s just another week in the ever-spinning wheel of entertainment fortune. Either way, both stories remind us that in the music business, today’s setback might just be tomorrow’s comeback waiting to happen.

Hollywood’s latest casting drama reads like a script straight out of a meta-comedy — complete with viral videos, social media showdowns, and the kind of plot twist that could only happen in 2025’s entertainment landscape.

Picture this: A relatively unknown actress, Brittney Rae Carrera, films herself watching Hulu’s new series “Chad Powers” only to discover her scene has been handed to internet sensation Haliey “Hawk Tuah” Welch. What follows isn’t just another Hollywood replacement story — it’s a perfect storm of traditional acting meets viral fame that practically screams “welcome to the new entertainment order.”

The video itself? Pure theater. There’s Carrera, surrounded by friends, her reaction building like a crescendo as she spots Welch on screen. “They replace me with Hawk Tuah?!” she practically howls, before launching into an oddly specific recreation of a Chernobyl-related line that — according to her — was supposed to be hers. The whole thing feels almost too perfectly calibrated for virality, which, let’s be honest, might be exactly the point.

But here’s where it gets interesting. Welch — whose claim to fame involves a particularly spicy viral interview that practically broke the internet last fall — handled the situation with surprising grace. Through a casual Instagram Story (because where else would this play out?), she basically shrugged it off: “It was as simple as this: I was called and asked to be in a TV series with [Glen Powell] and I said yes (bc duh it’s Glen Powell).” Can’t really argue with that logic.

The scene causing all the fuss appears in the show’s premiere, where Powell’s character — a fallen-from-grace footballer trying to reinvent himself — runs into Welch at a nightclub. There’s even a meta moment acknowledging her internet fame, complete with a cheeky correction about her “full human name.” It’s the kind of self-aware television that networks are desperately chasing these days.

Entertainment Weekly eventually got to the bottom of things. Turns out Carrera had indeed spent a day filming on set, though her footage never made the final cut. That’s showbiz, baby — except nowadays, getting cut doesn’t mean disappearing quietly into the night. It means creating content about getting cut, which might actually lead to more opportunities than the original role would have.

In a twist that probably shouldn’t surprise anyone in our content-hungry era, both women managed to spin the situation into more social media gold. Carrera posted a peace offering that cleverly referenced Welch’s viral claim to fame, while Welch’s graceful handling of the situation probably earned her even more fans.

The whole saga serves up a perfect snapshot of entertainment’s bizarre new ecosystem. Traditional acting chops are increasingly competing with follower counts, and the line between “internet famous” and “Hollywood famous” isn’t just blurring — it’s practically break-dancing. Whether that’s progress or pandemonium probably depends on which side of the TikTok algorithm you’re standing on.

Sometimes the universe has a twisted sense of irony. Case in point: Nine Inch Nails’ “Future Ruins” festival, which managed to become an actual ruin before it even launched. The ambitious celebration of film music, slated for November 8 at the Los Angeles Equestrian Center, has crumbled into the ether — leaving behind nothing but disappointed ticket holders and a particularly on-the-nose metaphor.

Talk about a soundtrack in search of its movie. The festival’s lineup read like a dream collaboration between the Oscars and your favorite record store clerk’s personal playlist. John Carpenter — yeah, that John Carpenter, the horror maestro himself — was supposed to share billing with Danny Elfman (probably leaving his Jack Skellington costume at home this time) and Mark Mothersbaugh, who’s somehow managed to evolve from Devo’s “Whip It” to scoring Wes Anderson’s meticulously crafted universes.

The cancellation announcement dropped Friday with all the subtlety of a Hans Zimmer crescendo. Citing those dreaded “logistical challenges and complications” (industry speak for “everything went sideways”), organizers pulled the plug on what promised to be the most interesting mashup of film scoring talent since… well, ever.

Trent Reznor, who’s gone from screaming “Head Like a Hole” to clutching an Oscar, had originally pitched the festival as a democratic celebration of sonic storytelling. “Every artist is a headliner,” he’d declared, presumably while not yet dealing with the headache of actually making that happen. The lineup would’ve included Questlove performing Curtis Mayfield’s groundbreaking work and recent Oscar winner Hildur Guðnadóttir showcasing her hauntingly beautiful compositions.

But perhaps the most telling part of this whole affair was the organizers’ oddly philosophical cancellation statement. “Rather than compromise, we’re choosing to re-think and re-evaluate.” It’s the kind of thing you might expect to hear in a moody Nine Inch Nails track — not a festival cancellation notice.

The concept itself was brilliant in its audacity. Picture Coachella for film composers, minus the influencer peacocking and plus a healthy dose of orchestral arrangements. Spread across three stages, these behind-the-scenes maestros would finally step into the spotlight, reimagining their work for live audiences. In theory, anyway.

Here’s the thing about niche festivals in 2023’s rocky economic landscape: they’re caught between artistic ambition and financial reality. Sure, people will pack concert halls to hear John Williams’ greatest hits performed live alongside Star Wars footage. But coordinating multiple stages of complex performances by some of cinema’s most exacting musical minds? That’s a different symphony entirely.

Live Nation’s handling the refunds, at least. Meanwhile, film score enthusiasts are left to imagine what could have been — a day when cinema’s emotional architects stepped out from behind their mixing boards and into the California sun. Though given LA’s recent weather patterns, maybe Mother Nature was just trying to save everyone from a very sweaty day of orchestral appreciation.

For now, “Future Ruins” joins the growing list of ambitious-but-canceled events that seem to be defining this peculiar post-pandemic era. Perhaps they’ll try again next year. After all, in the world of both film scores and festivals, timing is everything.