Blog

  • ‘American Primeval’ review: Can Netflix’s grimy Western mini-series best ‘Yellowstone’?

    ‘American Primeval’ review: Can Netflix’s grimy Western mini-series best ‘Yellowstone’?

    Preston Mota and Betty Gilpin in “American Primeval.” Credit: Justin Lubin / Netflix

    American Primeval is decently entertaining as an action-drama, though it’s quite fascinating in concept. The Netflix mini-series, created by Mark L. Smith and directed by Peter Berg, features an accomplished ensemble playing mostly familiar archetypes during a pre-Civil War struggle for the American West. However, it saps anything resembling wistfulness from its Hollywood Western roots, complicating its chances of cornering the post-Yellowstone market (alongside the latter’s many spin-offs). What’s left is the husk of a beloved genre, told in stark, chaotic hues seldom seen on-screen.

    The show’s numerous subplots are connected by grisly happenstance, albeit not much else. It’s a violent saga, even though its violence quickly plateaus. This goes for both its physical brutality, as well as the many cruel ideologies in its crosshairs, from white supremacy and religious fundamentalism to a general penchant for war. But that these are so nakedly on display, in a show this unapologetically grim, is a welcome surprise, from a setting and storytelling mode so otherwise steeped in nostalgia. Despite its threads unraveling in haphazard ways, the series is never boring, and never wanting for a good performance.

    The story of American Primeval, which takes place in the winter of 1857, is based on real locations and events, albeit with necessary dramatizations. With a bounty on her head for an alleged murder, well-to-do mother Sara Rowell (Betty Gilpin) absconds from Philadelphia with her pre-teen son Devin (Preston Mota) to meet up with her husband out west. But upon arriving at Fort Bridger — a real fur trading outpost in Wyoming along the Oregon Trail — she learns that her guide has already left, leading her to desperately search for safe passage wherever she can find it.

    The fort is not far from volatile conflicts between numerous factions. The Shoshone Tribe is one of several who have been driven from their native land by constant war. A ruthless Mormon militia patrols the territories near Utah, at the behest of the expansionist, extremist preacher Governor Brigham Young (a terrifying Kim Coates). Meanwhile, the conscientious U.S. Army Captain Edmund Dellinger (Lucas Neff) tries to keep the peace, but he’s growing increasingly cynical about the possibility of coexistence (as we’re frequently reminded, through his numerous diary entries narrated in voiceover).

    The aforementioned groups only account for about half the series’ characters, all of whom are set up bit-by-bit through very direct exposition. Additionally, there’s the lone gunman from whom Sara seeks help, the lonely and brooding Isaac (Taylor Kitsch), who shares an intimate history with the Shoshone. There are the bounty hunters on her trail, led by Virgil Cutter (Jai Courtney), a leader whose heartlessness clashes with his more empathetic protégé Lucas (Andrew P. Logan).

    There are the various militiamen and Mormon leaders, and there are also Mormon civilians just trying to find their way unscathed. Some of the latter end up inadvertently attacked when traveling with a larger caravan, including newlywed Abish Pratt (Saura Lightfoot-Leon) and her husband Jacob (Dane DeHaan), whose increasingly bloody and disheveled appearance each episode is as ludicrously funny as Homer Simpson hitting infinite rocks and tree branches. And of course, there’s Jim Bridger himself, the founder of the aforementioned fort, played with smarm and panache by the ever-delightful Shea Whigham.

    The show also features a number of Native characters who, although they’re seldom allowed to leave the strict confines of plot function — American Primeval is an anti-Western in every way but this — still displays a beating humanity and ethos. There’s the young, nonverbal Shoshone girl Two Moons (Shawnee Pourier), a runaway who hitches a ride with Sara and Devin, and there’s also rogue Shoshone warrior Red Feather (Derek Hinkey), who forms his own tribe intent on trading blood for blood. If the latter sounds a whole lot like a central character in Kevin Costner’s Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 1, his appearance isn’t the only time you’ll be making that comparison.

    If anything, the show plays like a morbid and cynical answer to Horizon, the film series that Costner left Yellowstone in order to make, and one that wrestles with the violence inherent to America’s founding myths while still morosely holding on to a folkloric image of the nation’s past. American Primeval has less trouble removing its rose-tinted glasses, even going as far as to deploy rearrangements of Woody Guthrie’s famous folk song “This Land Is Your Land” to deeply ironic effect. However, it struggles just as much as Costner’s film when it comes to switching between its numerous characters.

    The show’s structure and plot might mirror Costner’s Western epic, but its closest aesthetic cousins are actually Alejandro González Iñárritu’s own violent winter Western The Revenant (which Mark L. Smith also notably penned) and, in terms of frenetic editing, the Star Wars films of J.J. Abrams. That second comparison is, for the most part, complimentary. American Primeval charges forth with reckless abandon, leaving little room to consider the actual time and space between people spread across different parts of the landscape. That’s not always a good thing, but it means each new plot development is always just around the corner, with characters always ready to stumble into each other’s stories.

    On the other hand, the lack of actual travel time or any sort of downtime for the characters, even across six hours, leaves little room for them to unravel and develop. Gilpin and Kitsch, for instance, are suitably austere, resulting in Jane Austen-esque romantic tensions, but who they are as people is established from minute one, and remains frozen in stasis throughout the story. The same is true for most characters except DeHaan’s, who has the advantage of being changed by physical injury. No one is really affected or impacted, in human ways, by the show’s many goings-on.

    That said, those goings on are usually fun to watch, from gritty firefights in unbroken takes to vicious hand-to-hand combat in close quarters. Emmanuel Lubezki’s Oscar-winning cinematography for The Revenant was clearly the prototype here, with short-lensed close-ups skewing space and enhancing the impact of everything from blood to spittle, all covered in snow. The first episode is wonderfully chaotic, with its quick cuts and askew Dutch angles throwing everything off-balance as civilians are engulfed by attacks. Unfortunately, this visual approach ends up somewhat indiscriminate across the series, even during mundane conversations.

    The show’s washed-out palette and permeating muck and grime paint America’s infancy as a time of petty squabble without absolution — a counter-narrative to most of the country’s mythology about itself. However, the show also builds in a kind of narrative backstop to prevent it from falling into total despair: the American dream is still, in a sense, alive, but it’s relegated to the four walls of Fort Bridger.

    The fort, which appears early on in the series and becomes a frequent respite from the action, very much exists in the vein of cinema’s lawless Old West, with its saloons, and shootings, and hangings. But it’s also representative of an American ideal. It’s the only place in the show where characters from all walks of life, and all backgrounds (white, Native, or otherwise) can congregate, take refuge from religious extremism, and have an actual shot at living.

    It’s also the center of a beautifully haunting climax that revels in the slow demise of said ideals, which makes for a pitch-perfect conclusion to the show — or would have, had the series chosen to end on this symbolic note. Instead, it returns to one of its many ongoing narratives so that Person A can wander into Story B and conclude Subplot C, most of which jog in place for multiple episodes.

    While American Primeval occasionally wields its metaphors with skill, it is, for the most part, a banal and obvious show about the trickle-down effects of the past. For instance, Courtney’s Cutter, when addressing Sara, all but turns to the camera in order to deliver the line, “Our current circumstances are a reflection of our past decisions.” The problem with this sort of delivery — other than its thuddingly literal nature — is that this theme and every other one is established in the first episode and never transforms dramatically.

    American Primeval may be forward-thinking in its premise, with its apparent deconstruction of national history and self-image. However, its execution ends up with little to say, beyond the broad strokes of people’s selfishness causing pain and suffering. You learn this from the get-go, so you know exactly the kind of show you’re getting into from there on out, but there’s little left to learn. So, even its subversions of traditional Hollywood imagery and American mythmaking feel oddly familiar and comfortable by the end.

  • Elmo tells all: ‘Sesame Street’ 55th season features SZA, Chris Stapleton, Reneé Rapp and more

    Elmo tells all: ‘Sesame Street’ 55th season features SZA, Chris Stapleton, Reneé Rapp and more

    Elmo tells all: ‘Sesame Street’ 55th season features SZA, Chris Stapleton, Reneé Rapp and more

    MARIA SHERMAN

    January 9, 2025 at 1:31 PM

    1 / 4

    Music-Sesame Street

    This image released by Sesame Workshop shows singer SZA, left, with muppet character Oscar the Grouch on the set of “Sesame Street.” (Richard Termine/Sesame Workshop via AP)

    ASSOCIATED PRESS

    NEW YORK (AP) — Appearing on “Sesame Street”? That’s the best idea.

    The 55th season of the acclaimed family program features a star-studded lineup of musicians that would be the envy of any summer festival: SZA, Chris Stapleton, Noah Kahan, Reneé Rapp and Samara Joy.

    The upcoming season will focus on lessons in emotional well-being. It debuts Jan. 16 on MAX with new episodes releasing every Thursday. “Sesame Street” will also be available on PBS stations and to stream on PBS Kids in the fall.

    No one is more excited than Elmo himself.

    “There’s a lot to learn from music — yeah, timing and harmonies and melody and different styles and different cultures,” the 3 1/2-year-old monster told The Associated Press. “It’s really cool! We’ve got a lot of wonderful people come and do some music with us on ‘Sesame Street,’ like Miss Reneé Rapp and SZA! Chris Stapleton, Noah Kahan, Samara Joy — lots of great people!”

    Songs double as life lessons on “Sesame Street,” from an alt-R&B-pop track about gratitude with SZA to an acoustic number about feelings with Rapp.

    “SZA is really cool — really talented. And ‘gratitude’ was a new word for Elmo, too. So, Elmo learned all about gratitude with SZA,” he said.

    “Elmo was feeling really, really happy after his playdate with Miss Reneé. It was a really beautiful song. She’s got a great voice and Elmo hopes she comes back soon.”

    As for the secret to a great “Sesame Street” song? According to Tony – and Grammy-winning composer, producer and “Sesame Street” music director Bill Sherman, its “earworms on earworms.”

    “If the verse is an earworm, so is the chorus. Mostly in pop music, the chorus is the earworm, and the verses are just a bunch of jumble.” The difference, he explains, is that pop songs are about three and a half minutes long. Children’s music is about a minute and a half. “You only have a very finite amount of time to do what you got to do.”

    Usually, writers on the show provide Sherman and his team of songwriters with a script and lyrics detailing the lesson of each episode, as well as the name of the musical guest. Then they get to work, composing music true to the genre and spirit of each artist.

    Those musical guests take different levels of involvement, but the result is always awe-inspiring.

    Other highlights from this season include Kahan performing a foot-stomping folk song about music and feelings, Joy using jazz improvisation to teach a lesson in taking turns and a country ode to music and friends courtesy of Stapleton.

    “Chris Stapleton really wanted to write his own song,” says Sherman, and so the pair hopped on a Zoom and wrote a song together, Stapleton with his guitar in tow, ideas flowing. “It was really one of the most surreal two-hour Zooms that I really ever had in my life.”

    Joy took a different approach. “Samara Joy insisted on singing live,” says Sherman. “It very rarely happens on ‘Sesame Street.’ I can only count, like, a few times. So, there was like Stevie Wonder back in the day, which is a classic. And there’s like Billy Joel, there’s John Legend, there’s a couple people that actually sing live. But Samara insisted on it.”

    Her reasoning was simple. “She said, ‘Well, this whole episode is about improvisation and thinking on your toes. And so, if it’s prerecorded, that’s the opposite of what we’re trying to teach.’”

    If there is a theme that connects all these performances to one another, it’s a spirit of connection. At least, that’s Elmo’s theory: “Elmo thinks that music brings people together, you know? And some people who like some things and some people who like other things can kind of come together because they like the same kind of music. And that’s kind of cool!”

    “Sesame Street,” designed by education professionals and child psychologists, is shown in more than 150 countries, has won over 200 Emmys, 11 Grammys, two Peabody Awards and received a Kennedy Center Honor for lifetime artistic achievement, the first time a television program got the award.

    There’ve been no shortage of great musical guests across the show’s five decade run. So, who would they like to see pay a visit in the future? “Miss Taylor Swift! Maybe she could revisit her ‘Red’ era?” chimes in Elmo. That’s his favorite of her albums.

    “But also, Elmo would love to sing with Miss Beyoncé. Destiny’s Child was on ‘Sesame Street,’ so Elmo would love to have her back.”

  • Integrity on the Rocks: The Crisis Facing Scientific Research and Its Future

    Integrity on the Rocks: The Crisis Facing Scientific Research and Its Future

    The scientific community is currently navigating through tumultuous waters—one marked by a credibility crisis that threatens the very foundation of research integrity. Alarm bells are ringing, and insights from recent studies are shining a harsh spotlight on the quality of scientific publications. Take Maria Ángeles Oviedo-García, PhD, from the University of Seville, whose findings have laid bare growing concerns about the integrity of what is currently being published. It’s not just her voice in isolation; respected outlets like the journal Science and the savvy blog Retraction Watch echo these worries, illustrating a troubling trend that can’t be ignored.,The problems are glaringly evident. According to a report featured in Science, a significant inflow of subpar submissions—particularly contrived letters and comments spawned by artificial intelligence—has inundated journals. In an eye-opening announcement, Daniel Prevedello, MD, editor in chief of Neurosurgical Review, stated that his journal would temporarily halt the acceptance of these low-quality submissions, reflecting a desperate measure to uphold standards in a swirling sea of mediocrity. Prevedello’s decision isn’t an outlier; it’s indicative of a broader pattern where many journals are grappling with similar issues.,Consider the Oral Oncology Reports (Elsevier), where a staggering 70% of content was composed of these comments. In the International Journal of Surgery Open, this figure dropped to nearly half. Neurosurgical Review also revealed that letters, comments, and editorials constituted a whopping 58% of its total content from January to October 2024—an unthinkable rise from just 9% the previous year. This trend smacks of a fundamental shift in the reputation game, where authors inflate their publication lists by cranking out hastily-produced, low-quality contributions that ominously bypass rigorous peer review.,This phenomenon does nothing for the advancement of knowledge—yet it seems publishers are reaping the rewards. Many journals impose fees for publishing comments, fueling a system that prioritizes profit over substance. For research institutions and universities, this might initially seem beneficial; more publications can enhance their reputations. But at what cost? Oviedo-García cautions, “Some other researchers will probably base their future research on these fake reports, which is frightening, especially when it comes to health and medicine.”,Delving deeper, Oviedo-García’s analysis in Scientometrics revealed an unsettling pattern in peer reviews. A whopping 263 evaluations from 37 journals showcased a bizarre uniformity—reviewers often recycled phrases without any regard for content, leading to superficial evaluations. Imagine a reviewer using the same wording in 52 different reviews. It’s no wonder that the integrity of scientific literature is under siege; such practices only serve to undermine the very essence of peer review.,As if this wasn’t alarming enough, the entry of artificial intelligence into the research ecosystem adds another layer of complexity. AI systems are more than just data crunchers; they are now being utilized to generate entire articles at a staggering pace. This was underscored at international conferences, where experts suggested that AI could churn out papers in mere weeks and complete dissertations in under a year. This rapid-fire content generation raises crucial questions—how can we trust the quality of research if the process itself is becoming automated?,Moreover, researchers are sidestepping peer review altogether by publishing findings on readily accessible preprint servers. This trend compounds the issue further, as many articles end up with bloated authorship lists—hundreds of names attached, often with ambiguous contributions. It’s a publication arms race, and integrity is the first casualty.,For those entrenched in academia, this ongoing crisis has sparked a profound sense of concern. Ulrich Dirnagl, MD, PhD, from Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, articulated the reality succinctly: “The scientific papers have become so complex that two or three experts often cannot thoroughly assess everything presented.” The peer review process has stretched thin, often taking unpaid and anonymous reviewers several days to sift through content.,What does it all mean for the future? It recalls that old Russian proverb—“Trust, but verify.” As we stand at this crossroads, the call for vigilance has never been clearer. The scientific community must rally to reclaim its standards, or we risk consigning valuable research to the realm of the inconsequential. The stakes are high, and the time for action is now.

  • Alec Baldwin sues prosecutors in Rust trial, alleging civil rights violations

    Alec Baldwin sues prosecutors in Rust trial, alleging civil rights violations

    Actor has filed civil lawsuit claiming prosecutors targeted him for professional or political gain, and intentionally concealed evidence that vindicated him

    Actor Alec Baldwin has filed a civil lawsuit for malicious prosecution and civil rights violations against the prosecutors in his trial over the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the western movie Rust.

    The lawsuit was filed Thursday at state district court in Santa Fe, where a judge in July dismissed a charge of involuntary manslaughter against Baldwin in the death of Hutchins, who was killed in 2021.

    Defendants named in the lawsuit include special prosecutor Kari Morrissey and Santa Fe district attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies, along with three investigators from the Santa Fe County sheriff’s office and the county board of commissioners.

    Baldwin alleges prosecutors targeted him for professional or political gain, intentionally concealing evidence that would have vindicated him and intentionally mishandling evidence.

    “Defendants, while acting under the color of law, conspired to procure a groundless indictment against Baldwin and to maliciously bring about or advance Baldwin’s trial and conviction, thus violating Baldwin’s constitutional rights by their improper use of the criminal process,” the lawsuit states.

    Baldwin also alleges defamation in the suit, over statements made by prosecutors to media that he says falsely implied he was responsible for Hutchins’ death.

    “Defendants sought at every turn to scapegoat Baldwin for the acts and omissions of others, regardless of the evidence or the law,” the lawsuit states, accusing Carmack-Altwies and Morrissey of manipulating evidence and eliciting false testimony.

    Baldwin is seeking unspecified damages.

    Hutchins died shortly after being wounded during a rehearsal in October 2021 at a film-set ranch on the outskirts of Santa Fe, New Mexico.

    Baldwin, the film’s lead actor and co-producer, was pointing a pistol at Hutchins when it discharged, killing Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza. Baldwin has said he pulled back the hammer – but not the trigger – and the revolver fired.

    Baldwin’s trial was upended by revelations that ammunition was brought into the Santa Fe County sheriff’s office in March by a man who said it could be related to Hutchins’ killing. Prosecutors said they deemed the ammo unrelated and unimportant, while Baldwin’s lawyers say investigators “buried” the evidence in a separate case folder and filed a successful motion to dismiss.

    Morrissey said she learned more than a year ago that Baldwin was considering a lawsuit.

    “In October 2023 the prosecution team became aware that Mr Baldwin intended to file a retaliatory civil lawsuit,” she told the media in a text message Thursday. “We look forward to our day in court.”

    Carmack-Altwies and the Santa Fe sheriff’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Baldwin’s lawsuit argues that prosecutors should not be afforded immunity in their official roles.

    Baldwin’s case was closed in December when prosecutors decided not to appeal against the court’s decision to dismiss the charge against him.

    Separately, the shooting led to an involuntary manslaughter conviction at trial last year against movie weapons supervisor Hannah Gutierrez-Reed. She is serving out a maximum sentence of 18 months at a state penitentiary.

    The tort claim by Baldwin also takes aim at a special prosecutor who initially oversaw the investigation, while seeking unspecified punitive damages, compensatory damages, attorneys’ fees and interest.

    It adds to a thicket of post-trial litigation, even as Baldwin has returned to comic appearances on Saturday Night Live with plans in the works for a family reality TV show with his wife, Hilaria, and their seven children.

    The parents and younger sister of Hutchins have sued Baldwin and other producers of Rust in New Mexico state court. A settlement has already been reached in a lawsuit by Hutchins’ widower and their son.

  • ’28 Years Later’ Producer Shares Disappointing Update About Cillian Murphy’s Role

    ’28 Years Later’ Producer Shares Disappointing Update About Cillian Murphy’s Role

    If you were super-pumped to see Cillian Murphy back as Jim in 28 Years Later, the forthcoming third film in the 28 Days Later franchise, and the first of a planned trilogy, it’s time to pump the brakes on your excitement. According to the film’s producer, Andrew Macdonald, the Oscar-winning actor will not be appearing in the movie. So for those hoping to find out what Murphy’s character Jim has been up to since the first film, we likely won’t get any answers in the first installment.

    Speaking with Empire, Macdonald, who produced both 28 Days Later and its follow-up, 28 Weeks Later, among several other projects with director Danny Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland, says Murphy’s involvement in 28 Years Later is only as an executive producer.

    “…[We] wanted him to be involved and he wanted to be involved,” Macdonald said. “He is not in the first film, but I’m hoping there will be some Jim somewhere along the line.”

    So for now at least, fans will have to wait to see if Murphy will make an appearance in either of the subsequent sequels. However, unless he has already filmed scenes for the second installment, Nia DaCosta’s 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, which has reportedly already wrapped production, then we’ll have to wait for the third film in the trilogy to find out what has become of Jim.

    Fans thought they’d already spotted Jim in the trailer for 28 Years Later, as an emaciated zombie rising up in a field. But that turned out not to be the case. The emaciated zombie in question is played by Angus Neill, not Murphy, and the infected individual is not Jim.

    ’28 Years Later’ Is an Enigma Right Now Close

    Very little is known about 28 Years Later at this point. It stars Aaron-Taylor Johnson, Jodie Comer, and Ralph Fiennes, the latter of whom shared some tantalizing details about the plot of the film in an interview with IndieWire:

    Britain is 28 years into this terrible plague of infected people who are violent, rabid humans with a few pockets of uninfected communities. And it centers on a young boy who wants to find a doctor to help his dying mother. He leads his mother through this beautiful northern English terrain. But of course, around them hiding in forests and hills and woods are the infected. But he finds a doctor who is a man we might think is going to be weird and odd, but actually is a force for good.

    Related What That Creepy Poem Meant in the ’28 Years Later’ Trailer

    Overlaid with images of chaos, the ’28 Years Later’ trailer’s military poem holds a level of irony as it evokes terror and anxiety.

    Posts

    Comer has also spoken publicly about the film, though she revealed little about the plot. Rather, the Killing Eve star stated that 28 Years Later will be thematically similar to the original movie, focusing more on human behavior than shock and gore.

    28 Years Later is slated to hit theaters on June 20, 2025. Its sequel, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, will be released on January 16, 2026. There is no release date currently set for the third installment.

    28 Years Later Not Rated Horror Release Date June 20, 2025 Director Danny Boyle Cast Aaron Taylor-Johnson , Jodie Comer , Cillian Murphy , Jack O’Connell , Ralph Fiennes

  • Beauty queen, pop singer, and spokeswoman who became an anti-gay crusader dies at 84

    Beauty queen, pop singer, and spokeswoman who became an anti-gay crusader dies at 84

    Anita Bryant, a former beauty queen and pop singer of the 1960s whose career led her to become a spokesperson for Florida oranges in the early ’70s and an evangelical crusader against gay rights later in that decade, died Dec. 16 at age 84, her family announced Thursday.

    The family’s obituary for Anita Bryant Day, as she was known outside the public sphere, was published in her hometown newspaper, the Oklahoman, and said the singer-activist died at home last month in Edmond, Oklahoma, surrounded by family and friends.

    During her heyday as a public figure, Bryant was one of the most polarizing celebrities in America, vilified by much of the show business community for campaigning against what she viewed as a gay takeover of American culture, while being embraced as a hero by many religious conservatives.

    Prior to her taking those stands, she was best known for her appearances in commercials for Florida oranges that introduced the catchphrase “Breakfast without orange juice is like a day without sunshine” — and many parodies of that statement — into the popular lexicon.

    Those advertisements eclipsed her long-dormant career as a pop singer, even as she made a move into recording gospel music after easy-listening sounds fell out of fashion in the rock era.

    Bryant’s notable public appearances in her less controversial years included singing at both the Democratic and Republican conventions in 1968, being a staple of Bob Hope’s holiday tours for overseas troops for seven straight years, singing “The Battle Hymn of the Republic” at the 1971 Super Bowl, and providing that some anthem as a musical eulogy for President Lyndon Johnson at his 1973 funeral, after singing for him on several occasions.

    In 1977, Bryant began fronting a “Save Our Children” campaign aimed at repealing an ordinance in Miami-Dade County that prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

    The crusade was successful in getting the ordinance repealed that year by a popular vote. (It was not restored until 1998.)

    For the next three years, her activism against such regulations made her a poster girl for the religious right and the foremost public archenemy of the gay community and social liberals.

    Her statement that she “loves homosexuals, but hates their sin” became a sort of mantra for evangelicals — and a much-mocked meme among what would later be known as the LGBTQ community — for decades to come.

    In 1978, her views were further amplified by the national media when she was the subject of the monthly “Playboy Interview.”

    The magazine began by recapping the sudden turnaround in her image:

    “For her first 36 years, Anita Bryant was the stereotypic embodiment of the American dream; hers was a rags-to-riches saga in the best Horatio Alger tradition. … Her life was comfortable and distinctly uncontroversial. Last year, all that suddenly and dramatically changed; her halcyon routine perished in the flames of political warfare.

    “When the Metropolitan Dade County Commission passed an ordinance that would, in effect, mandate that qualified homosexuals be hired as teachers in private and parochial schools, Bryant stepped forward to spearhead a drive to repeal it.

    “The ensuing campaign was drawn along classic good-versus-evil lines. Bryant recruited a slew of religious leaders and conservative politicos under the banner of her ad hoc organization, Save Our Children.

    “Her pitch was simple: Homosexuality is a sin, and if homosexuals were given carte blanche to glamorize their ‘deviate lifestyle’ in Miami-area classrooms, the American family would be destroyed and the American way of life would disappear. … Bryant had become a fixture on the American political scene.”

    In the Playboy interview, Bryant said that she had not thought much about homosexuality prior to the Florida legislation that prompted her ire.

    “I got involved only because they were asking for special privileges that violated the state law of Florida, not to mention God’s law. … God says the wages of sin are death, and one little sin brings on another. The homosexual act is just the beginning of the depravity. It then leads to-what’s the word?-sadomasochism.

    “It just gets worse as it goes on. You go further and further down the drain and it just becomes so perverted and you get into alcohol and drugs and it’s so rotten that many homosexuals end up committing suicide.

    “The worst thing is that these days, so many married men with children who don’t have a happy marriage are going into the homosexual bars for satisfaction-if they’re not careful, they’re going to get caught up in it totally.”

    Her activism extended well beyond Florida as her fame in that arena grew, and she advocated for California’s infamous Briggs Initiative, which looked to ban public school employees from making pro-gay statements, at the cost of their employment.

    Even former California governor Ronald Reagan joined liberals in opposing the initiative, and once it went down to a massive defeat among voters, Bryant’s influence waned.

    Her activism led to the end of any substantial career Bryant had beyond the conservative Christian community.

    With Bryant becoming a punchline for Johnny Carson, and counteractivists boycotting oranges and adopting catchphrases like “A day without human rights is like a day without sunshine,” the Florida Citrus Commission declined to renew her contract as its brand ambassador in 1980, after an 11-year run that had included co-hosting the Orange Bowl Parade telecast for nine years.

    Other endorsement deals also dried up, although she had a sort of last hurrah with a two-hour “Anita Bryant Spectacular” patriotic special in 1980, with Bob Hope and Pat Boone costarring.

    Bryant divorced her husband, Bob Green, also in 1980, despite his publicly contesting the split on religious grounds. Her support in the evangelical community dropped as a result, with some of her former supporters believing that her initiating a divorce was sinful.

    After a decade of being single, she married her second husband, Charlie Hobson Dry, a childhood sweetheart, in 1990.

    One of Bryant’s most curious public appearances came in 1989 when she was interviewed by Roger Moore for his “Roger & Me” documentary. “Cheer up, Flint, Michigan,” Bryant was seen as advising the economically depressed city, leading to further derision.

    Bryant represented Oklahoma in the Miss America pageant in 1958, becoming second-runner-up.

    Many people believed she won the contest, because she already had some notoriety in television and music at that point. “I already had a recording contract when I did Miss America, so people knew me,” she said in a 2008 interview. “It’s really funny because people still tell me they remember when I won Miss America.”

    Bryant’s biggest break came when one of Arthur Godfrey’s talent scouts discovered her and put her on his variety show when she was 16, with a series of appearances there leading to her record deal.

    She soon was appearing on other shows, from Ed Sullivan’s to “American Bandstand.” Commercials for Kraft, Coca-Cola and Holiday Inn followed.

    Her biggest charting song was “Paper Roses,” which reached No. 5 on the Billboard Hot 100 in 1960. It was followed by one other top 10 song, “My Little Corner of the World.”

    She registered 14 singles on the chart between 1959 and 1964, recording for the Carlton and Columbia labels. As rock sounds took over, she was seen more often on TV variety shows than on pop radio.

    Bryant did not have any breakout albums, although a holiday album that became something of an easy listening perennial, “Do You Hear What I Hear?: Christmas With Anita Bryant,” peaked at No. 25 in 1967.

    In 1970, Bryan released her first album with Word, the prominent Christian label of the day, and released primarily religious material thereafter.

    She also wrote a series of books with and without her then-husband Bob for Fleming H. Revell, a Christian publisher, that were popular in religious bookstores throughout the ’70s. Her last album was released in 1985.

    She was nominated for three Grammys in the late ’60s and early ’70s, all for religious material, two in the since-renamed “best sacred performance” category and one for best inspirational performance.

    During her glory days as one of TV’s most sought-after advertising personalities, Bryan’s campaign for Florida oranges had such a positive effect, she was credited with orange juice sales climbing from 382 million gallons to 800 million-plus gallons during her 1969-80 tenure as pitchwoman.

    In the subsequent years when the gay rights controversies made her anathema to most mainstream television programmers and advertisers, she continued to enjoy name value among some older consumers who came to see her first in Branson, Missouri, where she and her second husband opened a theater in the early ’90s, and then Nashville, where she moved in 1998 to put on a live variety extravaganza.

    Bryant moved back to Oklahoma in 2002 to care for her ill mother, deciding to remain in the state thereafter because of its friendliness to her traditional religious values. Well out of the limelight, she worked on writing inspirational books and founding Anita Bryant Ministries International.

    Bryant was preceded in death by her husband, Charlie, and is survived by four children, two stepdaughters, and seven grandchildren and their spouses.

    © 2025 Variety Media, LLC, a subsidiary of Penske Business Media; Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC

  • Alec Baldwin Sues for ‘Malicious’ Prosecution After Dismissal of Involuntary Manslaughter Charge in ‘Rust’ Shooting

    Alec Baldwin Sues for ‘Malicious’ Prosecution After Dismissal of Involuntary Manslaughter Charge in ‘Rust’ Shooting

    Charmaine Patterson is an Associate Editor at PEOPLE. She first began working at PEOPLE in 2021 as a Digital News Writer. Her work has previously appeared on xoNecole, The Lakelander, and Aspire TV.

    Alec Baldwin has filed a malicious prosecution lawsuit six months after an involuntary manslaughter charge against him, stemming from the 2021 Rust shooting, was dropped.

    In a civil complaint obtained by PEOPLE on Thursday, Jan. 9, the actor, 66, sued prosecutors in the case, First Judicial District Attorney officials, Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office authorities and Santa Fe County Board of County Commissioners for “malicious abuse of process, intentional spoliation of evidence, defamation, and violation of the New Mexico Civil Rights Act.”

    Baldwin, through his attorneys, alleged the defendants were “blinded by their desire to convict” him “for all the wrong reasons, and at any cost,” for the fatal October 2021 shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.

    Baldwin was indicted in January 2024 after a gun he was holding on the set of the film Rust discharged in October 2021, killing Hutchins. The charge was dismissed in July 2024 after Baldwin’s attorneys alleged prosecutors had buried evidence. In December 2024, prosecutors dropped their notice to appeal the dismissal.

    In his lawsuit, Baldwin maintains that on the day of the fatal shooting, he was handed a prop gun and a crew member yelled out “cold gun” to “assure Baldwin” and those nearby that the firearm only had “dummy rounds” in it. “The prop fired a live round that killed Hutchins,” the complaint states.

    He alleges “certain defendants” purposefully hid evidence and lied while on the stand, aiming to make Baldwin the “scapegoat” for the tragedy. He wants the defendants, which include special prosecutor Kari Morrisey and District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies, to be “held accountable” for their “malicious and unlawful pursuit” against him.

    Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

    The lawsuit alleges Morrissey delivered “inconsistent” testimony on the evidence she allegedly concealed. It also alleges Carmack-Altwies defamed Baldwin when she said in a 2023 CNN interview that Baldwin “had a duty to make sure the set was safe,” suggesting he was at fault for Hutchins’ death.

    “The false and defamatory statements carry the unmistakable message that Baldwin committed a serious crime — i.e., that he negligently or recklessly caused the death of another human,” court documents allege.

    Baldwin is suing for general and/or compensatory damages in an amount to be decided at trial. He’s also suing for punitive damages and attorneys’ fees.

    “Criminal prosecutions are supposed to be about the search for truth and justice, not to pursue personal or political gain or harass the innocent,” his legal team Alex Spiro and Luke Nikas said in a statement to PEOPLE. “Kari Morrissey and the other defendants violated that basic principle, over and over, and trampled on Alec Baldwin’s rights. We bring this action to hold the defendants accountable for their misconduct and to prevent them from doing this to anyone else.”

    Morrissey tells PEOPLE in a statement, “In October 2023 the prosecution team became aware that Mr. Baldwin intended to file a retaliatory civil lawsuit. This was three months before the grand jury indicted him. We look forward to our day in court.”

    PEOPLE reached out to Carmack-Altwies for comment.

  • ‘Quiet on Set’ producer tackles Diddy abuse allegations in new docuseries: See the trailer

    ‘Quiet on Set’ producer tackles Diddy abuse allegations in new docuseries: See the trailer

    As Sean “Diddy” Combs’ legal fate hangs in the balance, several of his accusers are coming forward in a new docuseries to further detail his alleged abuses.

    Investigation Discovery released a trailer for its upcoming docuseries on the embattled music mogul, “The Fall of Diddy,” on Thursday. The four-part series, helmed by “Quiet on Set” producer Maxine Productions and Rolling Stone Films, will feature “exclusive, never-before-heard accounts and never-before-seen archival footage” illuminating the “harrowing allegations of violent behavior and illegal activity” recently leveled against Combs.

    “Spanning Combs’ decades-long impact on music and popular culture, from his early days as a talented creative to his 2024 arrest, the docuseries uncovers the insidious and terrifying allegations of sexual assault, abusive behavior, violence and other disturbing claims that lay beneath his success,” Investigation Discovery said in a press release.

    Combs, who was arrested in September on charges of racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution, remains in custody at the Special Housing Unit in Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center. A trial for the Grammy-winning rapper, who’s denied all accusations against him, is set to commence on May 5.

    Combs’ alleged misconduct came under scrutiny in November 2023 when ex-girlfriend and “Me & U” singer Casandra “Cassie” Ventura accused Combs of rape, sex trafficking and physical abuse in a lawsuit that was promptly settled one day after Ventura filed. The lawsuit spurred multiple civil suits alleging rape and sexual assault by the hip-hop mogul, as well as pair of federal raids.

    The docuseries will include interviews with more than 30 Combs’ associates, ranging from former friends and colleagues to individuals who worked directly for Combs, such as former Danity Kane member D. Woods.

    ‘Making of a Bad Boy’: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ legal troubles to be explored in Peacock documentary

    Thalia Graves and Rodney “Lil Rod” Jones Jr., both of whom have sued Combs for alleged sexual assault, appear in Thursday’s trailer. Graves, who claims Combs and his bodyguard “viciously raped her” in 2001, says in the clip: “I always believed that I was the only victim.”

    Jones, who worked as a producer on Combs’ “The Love Album: Off the Grid,” alleged in his February 2024 lawsuit that the rapper “forcibly touched” him and accused Combs and his associates of participating in “a sex-trafficking venture.”

    “There’s a lot of people like Puffy in the music business,” Jones says in the trailer. “Exposing Puffy means exposing them.”

    The ID series is not the only TV exposé on Combs’ alleged abuses. Streaming service Peacock will be releasing a documentary special, “Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy,” on Tuesday.

    “The Fall of Diddy” will premiere in two parts on Jan. 27 and Jan. 28 at 9 p.m. ET on Investigation Discovery. Episodes will also be available to stream on Max.

    Contributing: KiMi Robinson, USA TODAY

  • Elmo tells all: ‘Sesame Street’ 55th season features SZA, Chris Stapleton, Reneé Rapp and more

    Elmo tells all: ‘Sesame Street’ 55th season features SZA, Chris Stapleton, Reneé Rapp and more

    This image released by Sesame Workshop shows actor-singer Renee Rapp with muppet characters Cookie Monster, from left, Elmo and Abby Cadabby on the set of “Sesame Street.” (Richard Termine/Sesame Workshop via AP)

    The 55th season of the acclaimed family program features a star-studded lineup of musicians that would be the envy of any summer festival: SZA, Chris Stapleton, Noah Kahan, Reneé Rapp and Samara Joy.

    The upcoming season will focus on lessons in emotional well-being. It debuts Jan. 16 on MAX with new episodes releasing every Thursday. “Sesame Street” will also be available on PBS stations and to stream on PBS Kids in the fall.

    No one is more excited than Elmo himself.

    “There’s a lot to learn from music — yeah, timing and harmonies and melody and different styles and different cultures,” the 3 1/2-year-old monster told The Associated Press. “It’s really cool! We’ve got a lot of wonderful people come and do some music with us on ‘Sesame Street,’ like Miss Reneé Rapp and SZA! Chris Stapleton, Noah Kahan, Samara Joy — lots of great people!”

    Songs double as life lessons on “Sesame Street,” from an alt-R&B-pop track about gratitude with SZA to an acoustic number about feelings with Rapp.

    “SZA is really cool — really talented. And ‘gratitude’ was a new word for Elmo, too. So, Elmo learned all about gratitude with SZA,” he said.

    “Elmo was feeling really, really happy after his playdate with Miss Reneé. It was a really beautiful song. She’s got a great voice and Elmo hopes she comes back soon.”

    As for the secret to a great “Sesame Street” song? According to Tony – and Grammy-winning composer, producer and “Sesame Street” music director Bill Sherman, its “earworms on earworms.”

    “If the verse is an earworm, so is the chorus. Mostly in pop music, the chorus is the earworm, and the verses are just a bunch of jumble.” The difference, he explains, is that pop songs are about three and a half minutes long. Children’s music is about a minute and a half. “You only have a very finite amount of time to do what you got to do.”

    Usually, writers on the show provide Sherman and his team of songwriters with a script and lyrics detailing the lesson of each episode, as well as the name of the musical guest. Then they get to work, composing music true to the genre and spirit of each artist.

    Those musical guests take different levels of involvement, but the result is always awe-inspiring.

    Other highlights from this season include Kahan performing a foot-stomping folk song about music and feelings, Joy using jazz improvisation to teach a lesson in taking turns and a country ode to music and friends courtesy of Stapleton.

    “Chris Stapleton really wanted to write his own song,” says Sherman, and so the pair hopped on a Zoom and wrote a song together, Stapleton with his guitar in tow, ideas flowing. “It was really one of the most surreal two-hour Zooms that I really ever had in my life.”

    Joy took a different approach. “Samara Joy insisted on singing live,” says Sherman. “It very rarely happens on ‘Sesame Street.’ I can only count, like, a few times. So, there was like Stevie Wonder back in the day, which is a classic. And there’s like Billy Joel, there’s John Legend, there’s a couple people that actually sing live. But Samara insisted on it.”

    Her reasoning was simple. “She said, ‘Well, this whole episode is about improvisation and thinking on your toes. And so, if it’s prerecorded, that’s the opposite of what we’re trying to teach.’”

    If there is a theme that connects all these performances to one another, it’s a spirit of connection. At least, that’s Elmo’s theory: “Elmo thinks that music brings people together, you know? And some people who like some things and some people who like other things can kind of come together because they like the same kind of music. And that’s kind of cool!”

    “Sesame Street,” designed by education professionals and child psychologists, is shown in more than 150 countries, has won over 200 Emmys, 11 Grammys, two Peabody Awards and received a Kennedy Center Honor for lifetime artistic achievement, the first time a television program got the award.

    There’ve been no shortage of great musical guests across the show’s five decade run. So, who would they like to see pay a visit in the future? “Miss Taylor Swift! Maybe she could revisit her ‘Red’ era?” chimes in Elmo. That’s his favorite of her albums.

    “But also, Elmo would love to sing with Miss Beyoncé. Destiny’s Child was on ‘Sesame Street,’ so Elmo would love to have her back.”

  • Vigilance in the Shadows: The Alarming Rise of Radical Threats Across America

    Vigilance in the Shadows: The Alarming Rise of Radical Threats Across America

    In the chilling aftermath of the Islamic extremist terror attack in New Orleans, a dark cloud has settled over the hearts and minds of many Americans. The reverberations are palpable, prompting urgent questions—who else is at risk? What’s coming next? As a nation grapples with fear and uncertainty, Sarah Adams, a former CIA targeter, takes center stage, shedding light on the alarming potential for further attacks across the United States.

    Adams made a prediction six to seven months ago—one that has now turned into a grim reality. “There are radical Islamists peppered across the United States,” she warned, highlighting a concerning presence of so-called sleeper cells primed for coordinated terror strikes. Yes, this isn’t the stuff of Hollywood thrillers; this is the weighty truth that Adams emphasizes.

    During a recent interview on “The Liz Wheeler Show,” Adams dove into the disturbing implications of these threats. “If we are sitting here in the United States in a situation where there are a thousand radical Islamist sleeper cells… what are they waiting for?” Wheeler pressed, her voice thick with concern.

    Adams didn’t shy away from the gravity of the situation. “There’s going to be a number of these, as you call them, ‘lone wolf attacks’ over the course of whatever time al-Qaeda chose and whatever deal they made with the Islamic State Khorasan Province,” she explained. It’s a tactic that aims to divert law enforcement’s attention towards these individuals—those lone wolves—drawing crucial resources away from sniffing out larger, more coordinated plots. It’s a well-known game of misdirection, and it could have deadly consequences.

    Under the Biden administration, Adams argues, the threat has escalated. “We let a lot of terrorists into the country,” she stated bluntly. This influx is not merely a statistic; it has real-world implications, as it takes time to train and operationalize these threats. The proverbial clock is ticking—these operatives are being deployed, and the landscape of potential attacks is shifting.

    Adams alerts that we’re on the precipice of a series of attacks—which she insists could be thwarted with vigilance and preparedness. She paints a picture that is both chilling and urgent. “What do you anticipate these attacks looking like?” Wheeler challenged. “Are we going to see these quote-unquote ‘one-offs’ like in New Orleans, just randomly and with more frequency?”

    Adams replied with a sobering clarity. “We have both,” she stated, indicating that while random acts of violence will likely proliferate, a more concerted assault is also on the horizon. “We’re probably going to see at least one U.S. embassy overseas targeted, and then there is a large 9/11-style attack,” she continued.

    But it doesn’t stop there—Adams warned that these forthcoming attacks might resemble the horrifying Hamas strikes or the infamous Mumbai plot from over a decade ago. The implications are staggering, haunting, and shadowed by a grim reality. “We believe about 10% of the attackers will be suicide bombers,” she elaborated, asserting that the devastating potential of these strategies isn’t confined to just land; it could also play out in the air—“on airplanes,” she added, leaving a heavy silence in its wake.

    In this age of uncertainty, with fear hovering like a thick fog, the call to remain vigilant has never been more pressing. For every action we take towards prevention, there’s a counteraction being plotted by radical agendas lurking in the shadows. As citizens, we must arm ourselves not just with information, but with a strategic mindset to face these challenges head-on. This is not just about surviving; it’s about thriving amidst adversity, rising up to protect our communities—together. How we respond in the coming days and months could mean the difference between safety and chaos.