Blog

  • Kendrick Lamar Vs. Drake Is a Decade Too Late

    Kendrick Lamar Vs. Drake Is a Decade Too Late

    Finally, after a decade of false starts and errant subliminals and cold war, Kendrick Lamar full-out dissed Drake.

    Better yet, Kendrick dissed Drake on perhaps the spiciest terms he could’ve arranged: on a song (“Like That”) with Drake’s favorite collaborator and longtime frenemy, Future. “Like That” is six tracks into Future and Metro Boomin’s new album, We Don’t Trust You, and Future also appears to be dissing Drake on the title track, though in much more opaque and ambiguous terms. Kendrick is exceedingly clear on “Like That,” though: “Fuck sneak-dissing / ‘First Person Shooter,’ I hope they came with three switches … / Motherfuck the big three, nigga, it’s just big me!”

    These lyrics are written largely in response to Drake and J. Cole’s recent collaboration, “First Person Shooter,” from Drake’s latest album, For All the Dogs, which is a bit odd as far as provocations go since “First Person Shooter” isn’t a particularly disrespectful song. Drake and Cole both flatter themselves, in a lengthy celebration of their own greatness, and Cole mentions Kendrick only to flatter him, too: “Love when they argue the hardest MC / Is it K-Dot? Is it Aubrey? Or me? / We the big three like we started a league.” Maybe Kendrick found this bit of deference rather patronizing. Cole’s verse does ominously recall Jay-Z on “Where I’m From,” rapping a few years before he fell into his legendary feud with Nas: “I’m from where niggas pull your card and argue all day about / Who’s the best emcees, Biggie, Jay-Z, or Nas?” Maybe he objected to Cole going on to compare himself to Muhammad Ali. But Drake — Drake didn’t have to say anything on “First Person Shooter,” really. Drake vs. Kendrick has been a long time coming, regardless.

    We could sit here all day dissecting the interpersonal dynamics and theorizing about the motivations of all the relevant players behind the scenes. Is Metro, as long rumored, really still pressed that Drake and 21 Savage’s Her Loss supposedly overshadowed his own chart-topping album Heroes & Villains during award season last year? Are Future and Drake, as recently speculated, really fighting over a stripper from Miami? What did J. Cole even do, exactly, to get lumped into this conflict? I doubt we’ll ever know for sure — such is the fog of hip-hop gossip. But the deeper question isn’t “Why?” so much as “Why now?” And what does this beef even mean now, compared to when it was supposed to be the defining rap beef of a generation in the mid-to-late 2010s, at the height of Drake’s and Kendrick’s respective careers?

    Jay-Z vs. Nas — the legendary 2000s feud that in many ways set the standard for high-profile, nonviolent hip-hop conflicts — is especially instructive in the case of Kendrick vs. Drake, if largely because they’re in contrast. By the turn of the century, Jay had hits, and, as a protégé of the late Notorious B.I.G., he had stature. He was spoiling for a title: best rapper alive. But he had to contend with a series of hip-hop superstars — Ja Rule, DMX, Eminem, 50 Cent — who each for a time outsold him and overshadowed him in some way or another. Meanwhile, Nas, during the same period, was in a very different position. He’d fallen off for the most part. “Oochie Wally” was a modest hit but also, given its uncharacteristic sound and its club-oriented appeal, a worrisome sign of creative decline and selling out. Jay and Nas needed to overcome each other to elevate themselves to the top of the pile. Their inevitable conflict was one of fitting contrasts. Jay was from Brooklyn; Nas was from Queens. Jay was the savvy cosmopolitan hitmaker; Nas was the insular prodigy. Jay was the overlord; Nas was the underdog. Jay vs. Nas was a great story.

    This is also why the feud had to end as it did in October 2005: with Jay calling his surprise guest, Nas, from backstage at his much-hyped I Declare War concert in New Jersey to sing the hook on “Dead Presidents II.” (This was the song that sparked the feud between Jay and Nas in the first place; Nas supposedly resented Jay for sampling “The World Is Yours,” from Illmatic, for the hook.) This was a year into Jay’s tenure as the president of Def Jam and a few months before Def Jam would sign Nas away from Columbia. Suddenly Jay and Nas were business partners and musical collaborators. Their legacies were settled, and now there was a new story to be told, about the great reconciliation of the rap gods. And there was money to be made, as hip-hop was on track to become the world’s biggest genre in terms of sales and, later, streams. So of course the war ended.

    What is the story of Drake and Kendrick Lamar, then? They have a couple of early collaborations — “Fuckin’ Problems” and “Poetic Justice” in 2012 — but conspicuously, they haven’t worked together in more than a decade. “Conspicuously” because, all the while, rumored tensions and implicit contrasts lingered between the most successful artist in the history of streaming music (Drake, with more than 75 billion lifetime streams on Spotify) and the only rapper to have ever won a Pulitzer Prize (Kendrick, for Damn.). Drake and Kendrick simply avoided each other. Instead, Drake fought Meek Mill, then Pusha T, then Kanye West. Each of these conflicts was entertaining in its own way, but none of them ever really seemed as vital as a potential feud with Kendrick. Kendrick, for his part, avoided rap beefs altogether. His famous tirade against several rappers, including Drake and Cole, on 2013’s “Control” was iconically provocative but also prohibitively broad and vague. He’s otherwise proved too high-minded to pick a fight with any rapper individually and see it through with a proper diss track. (Say what you will about Drake and the heavily passive-aggressive aspects of his songwriting and persona; he nuked Meek Mill with not one, but two diss tracks within a week of Meek tweeting about Drake’s alleged use of ghostwriters.) The story of Kendrick Lamar in the past decade is that of a rapper ascending to rarefied air, miles above the field of competition, years removed from any obligation to prove himself to Drake or anyone else.

    But perhaps this was foolish of both Kendrick and Drake, thinking they could skip this step in forging their respective legacies. Jay-Z and Nas scrapped in the primes of their respective careers. Nas was in a rut before Stillmatic, sure, but he was 28, and Stillmatic would mark his return to mainstream relevance through the present day. In contrast, Kendrick is 36, and Drake is only a year older. Drake is nine albums and seven mixtapes deep. Kendrick is canonized. These guys are good money. And yet … their stories aren’t finished, if only because they’ve deferred the explicit realization of this feud for so long, until now. They need to overcome each other, to ultimately validate their elevation. Rap beefs (the nonviolent ones, at least) are in some sense quite silly — fits of name-calling and chest-beating and tedious gossip. But all those boasts and threats — the stuff of rap lyrics — have to pay off somehow, at some point. Also recall Jay on “Where I’m From,” outlining the iron laws of the Marcy Projects: “Your word was everything, so everything you said you’d do? / You did it, couldn’t talk about it if you ain’t live it.” It took Kendrick a decade to recognize as much. Now, let’s see how long it takes Drake to properly respond.

  • Charlie Puth Condemns Kanye West’s Super Bowl Ad

    Charlie Puth Condemns Kanye West’s Super Bowl Ad

    “Please man, I beg you to stop,” Puth wrote on an Instagram Story.

    West appeared in an ad toward the end of the Super Bowl on Sunday directing fans to the website of his brand, Yeezy. Though the website featured various products for sale on the day of the ad’s release, by Monday morning it only showed one item: a T-shirt with an image of a swastika.

    “MILLIONS of people are influenced by you,” Puth continued. “Please I BEG you to stop, PLEASE.”

    The Anti-Defamation League also issued a response to West’s stunt on Monday. “As if we needed further proof of Kanye’s antisemitism, he chose to put a single item for sale on his website — a T-shirt emblazoned with a swastika,” their statement read. “The swastika is the symbol adopted by Hitler as the primary emblem of the Nazis. It galvanized his followers in the 20th century and continues to threaten and instill fear in those targeted by antisemitism and white supremacy. If that wasn’t enough, the T-shirt is labeled on Kanye’s website as ‘HH-01,’ which is code for ‘Heil Hitler.’ Kanye was tweeting vile antisemitism nonstop since last week. There’s no excuse for this kind of behavior. Even worse, Kanye advertised his website during the Super Bowl, amplifying it beyond his already massive social media audience.”

    The Super Bowl ad appeared to be a local buy and did not air nationally. It was reportedly “paid for by Yeezy LLC” and aired again on Fox later Sunday, around two hours after the game ended.

    The back and forth comes within days of West’s controversial appearance at the 2025 Grammy Awards, where he arrived with his wife, Bianca Censori, who unveiled a black coat to reveal reveal a sheer dress with no underwear. West later defended his wife’s outfit. Though reports later surfaced of Censori asking for help on social media, the model’s rep denied those claims.

  • Man accused of stabbing Salman Rushdie goes on trial – UPI.com

    Man accused of stabbing Salman Rushdie goes on trial – UPI.com

    Feb. 10 (UPI) — The trial of a man accused of stabbing renowned British Indian author Salman Rushdie on a New York stage in 2022 began Monday for opening statements in his attempted murder and assault trial.

    Hadi Matar, 27, is accused of running onstage during an event featuring Rushdie and stabbing him in front of a large crowd at the Chautauqua Institute’s amphitheater. Rushdie recovered but one of the stab wounds left him blind in one eye.

    Advertisement

  • Kendrick Lamar Is A Certified Pulitzer-Prize Artist, Hater, And The True Winner Of The Super Bowl

    Kendrick Lamar Is A Certified Pulitzer-Prize Artist, Hater, And The True Winner Of The Super Bowl

    Lamar played with danger, controversy, and his unapologetic art.

    On Sunday night, in front of the world, Kendrick Lamar demonstrated for all why he is one of the most thrilling, uncompromising, and culturally consequential artists of his era.

    The Super Bowl LIX Halftime Show was never going to be just another performance, we all knew it was a moment of reckoning. In a league notorious for playing it safe, Lamar played with danger, controversy, and his unapologetic art. He declared himself as the moment, the movement, and the menace all at once.

    Before we talk about the Super Bowl, let’s take a step back. Kendrick Lamar is not just another rap superstar he’s a Pulitzer Prize winning artist. When he received the award in 2018 for DAMN., he shattered a barrier, becoming the first non-classical, non-jazz musician to win the prize. The Pulitzer board called the album “a virtuosic song collection” that captures “the complexity of modern African-American life.” That distinction alone places him in a different league than any of his contemporaries.

    For more than a decade, Lamar has proven himself to be not just a lyricist but a storyteller who will not be boxed in. He tells tales that challenge race, power, and life in America. His music is not just rap. It is literature, cinema, and history combined. That is why his name must be grouped with the greats, from Toni Morrison to James Baldwin.

    It was fitting, then, that when Lamar occupied the center stage of the Super Bowl LIX Halftime Show was the lead up to a true masterpiece. With a Samuel L. Jackson-portrayed Uncle Sam hovering over him, Lamar played off of the fears that he’s “too dangerous” for America’s largest stage. Well instead of toning down his message, he leaned into it. He didn’t merely wish to perform for the Super Bowl crowd because he knew they weren’t here for him, so instead he wished to unsettle them. Dancers dressed in red, white, and blue formed a moving flag, and Lamar stood in its center, defiant, a rip in the fabric of American idealism. It was a visual and thematic extension of what he’s always represented: a mirror held up to reflect America’s hypocrisy back onto itself.

    And then came the moment everyone was waiting for.

    For weeks, there was speculation about whether Lamar would take the stage to perform “Not Like Us,” his blistering diss track against Drake, a song that was a cultural moment unto itself in 2024. A lawsuit, a simmering industry feud, and millions of curious fans provided layers of anticipation. Lamar played with expectations. Initially, he teased the song, smiling as the instrumental boomed through the Superdome. Then he pump-faked, going into the more crowd-pleasing All the Stars with SZA.

    “They tried to rig the game, but you can’t fake impact,” he snarled, launching into a full-throttle performance of “Not Like Us.” And in case the world wasn’t paying attention, the cameras panned to Serena Williams — a Compton icon, tennis star, and Drake ex-girlfriend — crip walking to the beat.

    It was poetic, brutal, and absolutely unforgettable.

    Football fans may recall Super Bowl LIX for the Eagles vs. Chiefs matchup, and the Eagles well deserved win, but the true victor was Kendrick Lamar. His set wasn’t a halftime performance for those looking to forget about it the next day. It was a hostile takeover of American pop culture. He didn’t stage a spectacle; he solidified his legacy as the artist who won’t play by the rules, be it in music, in industry feuds, or on the world’s largest stage.

    A Pulitzer winner, a virtuosic hater, and the unequivocal voice of his generation Kendrick Lamar showed once more that he isn’t merely a part of the culture. He is the culture.

  • Green Day Are Making A Live Nation Comedy Movie

    Green Day Are Making A Live Nation Comedy Movie

    Did you know Live Nation, the concert promoter, is in the movie business? The company is behind Rolling Loud, the upcoming Owen Wilson/Matt Rife film set at the titular hip-hop fest. And now Green Day are making their own Live Nation feature.

    New Years Rev is a coming-of-age comedy about three friends who mistakenly believe they’re going to open for Green Day, The Wrap reports. Lee Kirk will write and direct the film, which stars Mason Thames, Kylr Coffman, and Ryan Foust. Kirk’s wife, Jenna Fischer, and her The Office castmate Angela Kinsey are also in the cast, as are Ignacio Diaz- Silverio and Keen Ruffalo.

    In a statement, Green Day’s Billie Joe Armstrong says the movie is inspired by their early years touring in a van:

    Van days rule. You will drive all night on no sleep then play a show for 10 kids in a basement of a friend of a friend’s house 50 miles east of anywhere you’ve ever heard of. But you’ll do it again the next day, and the one after that. Because you’re doing it with your bandmates who become your family and it’s unlike anything you’ve ever known. It’s electric. Let the music and mischief ensue.

    Armstrong and his Green Day bandmates Mike Dirnt and Tre Cool are producers on the project. Filming is reportedly underway in Oklahoma. I would say I wonder what they think about this at Gilman, but I’m pretty sure I already know.

  • Mumba criticises Eurosong panel after losing out

    Mumba criticises Eurosong panel after losing out

    Samantha Mumba has criticised members of the Eurosong judging panel, saying their comments were “unnecessarily rude and vile” following The Late Late Show Eurosong Special on Friday night.

    Mumba came second with her track My Way when the public votes, international jury, and national jury votes were counted, losing out to Norweigan singer EMMY who was victorious with her song, Laika Party.

    Posting on Instagram at the weekend, Mumba thanked her supporters and expressed pride in her performance.

    Mumba wrote: “This that got it, GOT IT… and those that didn’t, that’s OK too. It’s my art, and I stand by it.”

    She also commented on the panel, saying: “Special mention to the “panel” (aside from Bambie, who I stan) who not only didn’t have the credentials, experience, or professionalism required and were unnecessarily rude and vile to all the finalists…. (Would have said this in person but they all left the green room before I had the opportunity to) unsurprisingly.”

    The panel for this year’s Eurosong featured choreographer and Dancing with the Stars judge Arthur Gourounlian, 2FM broadcaster Laura Fox, chef and TV presenter Donal Skehan and Bambie Thug, who represented Ireland at last year’s Eurovision Song Contest.

    In response to Mumba’s comments, a spokesperson for RTÉ said: “We are extremely grateful to The Late Late Show Eurosong panel for their professionalism, insight, integrity and good humour.

    “Their role is to give their honest reaction to the performances on the night, offering their thoughts on the likely success of the song and act at the Eurovision Song Contest.

    “Our panel did this in a thoughtful and considered way. It seems this was in line with the public vote that ultimately made the decision on the artist and song they wished to represent Ireland at this year’s contest.

    “It’s never easy to offer a personal opinion, as not everyone will agree. Our panel did that with the utmost care and we wish to extend our thanks to them for the excellent job they did on Friday night.”

    During the broadcast, the panel provided feedback on all competing entries. Speaking about My Way, Gourounlian said: “It felt like ten different demos put together in one song…. The vocals were there, but I couldn’t relate at all.”

    Fox said: “Samantha Mumba is an icon in her own right… I just think My Way might be a little too slow.”

    Skehan suggested that “if she goes to Eurovision, there is an opportunity for a revamp,” while Bambie Thug said a revamp “could actually boost it”.

    After being selected to represent Ireland at the Eurovision Song Contest in Switzerland this May with her song Laika Party, EMMY said she was “in shock”.

    Reacting to her win, the 24-year-old said: “I’m just in shock, thank you so, so much. This can’t be happening!”

    In her Instagram post, Mumba also congratulated EMMY, writing: “The very best of luck to the sweetest @emmykgk00 (EMMY). Please fly the flag and make us proud in Switzerland!”

    Watch: Norwegian singer EMMY perform Laika Party which is Ireland’s entry for this year’s Eurovision Song Contest

    We need your consent to load this comcast-player contentWe use comcast-player to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Please review their details and accept them to load the content.Manage Preferences

  • Kanye West’s X account goes dark after days of antisemitic, racist, misogynistic rants | CBC News

    Kanye West’s X account goes dark after days of antisemitic, racist, misogynistic rants | CBC News

    WARNING: This story contains offensive language.

    Less than a week after musician Kanye West started blasting his 34 million social media followers with a series of antisemitic, misogynistic and racist posts, his X account appears to have been deactivated.

    West, who also goes by Ye, has seen his reputation plummet in recent years due to his antisemitic statements and controversial actions.

    He posted a final series of rants about musicians Taylor Swift and Kendrick Lamar during the Super Bowl on Sunday.

    He criticized Swift for singing along to Lamar’s halftime show, writing that “Kendrick is being used by these white people and Jews and so am I.” He also posted that Lamar should use his halftime platform to call for the release of rapper Sean “Diddy” Combs, who is being held in jail awaiting trial for sexual offences, including sex trafficking.

    By Sunday afternoon, X owner Elon Musk had unfollowed Ye and said his account was now classified “NSFW” (not safe for work).

    “Given what he has posted, his account is now classified as NSFW. You should not be seeing that anymore,” Musk wrote in response to a follower who complained that Ye was posting “literal porn on the timeline.”

    A few hours later, Ye said his goodbyes, and then his account went dark.

    “I’m logging out of Twitter. I appreciate Elon for allowing me to vent. It has been very cathartic to use the world as a sounding board,” Ye wrote in his final post, according to multiple media outlets.

    Ye’s former account now simply says, “this account does not exist.” None of his past posts are visible.

    CBC News has reached out to X for comment on whether Ye was banned or deleted his account, but has not received a response. According to X’s online help centre, account owners have the ability to deactivate their account at any time, that and when an account owner deactivates their account, “the page will be rendered as unavailable.”

    The corresponding example image is identical to how Ye’s account now appears.

    Ye was previously locked out of Twitter (now known as X) and Instagram in 2022 for antisemitic posts. In 2023, X reactivated Ye’s account.

    Ye has a long history of offensive and antisemitic comments, including repeated praise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. He also once suggested slavery was a choice and called the COVID-19 vaccine “the mark of the beast.” In October 2022, he was criticized for wearing a “White Lives Matter” T-shirt at his Paris Fashion Week show and tweeted threats to Jewish people.

    Later that month, the Balenciaga fashion house cut ties with Ye and he lost the lucrative partnership with Adidas — which helped catapult him to billionaire status — over his remarks. In late 2023, Ye went on an antisemitic rant in Las Vegas while promoting his album Vultures. In the rant, he made insidious insinuations about Jewish influence and compared himself to Jesus Christ and Adolf Hitler.

    Ye’s behaviour was back in the public eye last week. First, for his appearance at the Grammys with his wife, model Bianca Censori, who walked the red carpet in a completely sheer dress, leaving her essentially naked, as Ye looked on.

    Then, for revealing in a podcast that he was diagnosed with autism, and suggesting it was to blame for some of his past behaviour.

    Starting last Thursday and ending Sunday, Ye posted a series of rants on X that repeatedly berated Jewish people, mentioned the Holocaust and praised Hitler, among other topics. Included among the many all-caps posts last Thursday and Friday, he wrote that he doesn’t trust Jewish people, “I’m racist” and “I love Hitler. Now what, bitches.”

    He also wrote that he was “never apologizing for my Jewish comments.”

    On Friday, the American Jewish Committee released a statement condemning Ye for continuing to “purposefully use his platform to spew anti-Jewish hatred.”

    “While some may dismiss his hateful rants, we cannot overlook the dangerous influence they can have on his millions of followers, particularly on social media, where a significant portion of today’s antisemitism thrives,” the AJC wrote.

    “Hate, left unchecked, only multiplies. At a time when antisemitism is skyrocketing to terrifying levels worldwide, Ye is actively endangering Jews.”

    Friends actor David Schwimmer is among those who called on Musk to ban Ye from X. In an Instagram post Sunday, Schwimmer wrote, “we can’t stop a deranged bigot from spewing hate filled, ignorant bile… but we CAN stop giving him a megaphone, Mr. Musk.”

    “Kanye West has 32.7 million followers on your platform, X. That’s twice as many people than the number of Jews in existence,” Schwimmer wrote.

    On Friday, in response to a follower on X who posted about “Kanye’s attention-seeking meltdown,” calling it “deranged,” Musk replied, “indeed.”

    “So many issues like this can be solved simply by internalizing responsibility,” Musk added.

  • Prosecutor says Salman Rushdie was too stunned to react when a man started to stab him

    Prosecutor says Salman Rushdie was too stunned to react when a man started to stab him

    MAYVILLE, N.Y. — Salman Rushdie was so stunned when a masked man started to stab him on a stage in western New York that the acclaimed author didn’t even try to fight back, a prosecutor said Monday during opening statements in the suspect’s attempted murder trial.

    Rushdie, 77, is expected to testify during the trial of Hadi Matar, bringing the two face-to-face for the first time since the attack that left Rushdie seriously wounded and blind in one eye.

    On the day of the attack in August 2022, the Booker Prize-winning author was seated in an armchair on stage at the Chautauqua Institution Amphitheater, about to present a lecture on keeping writers safe.

    District Attorney Jason Schmidt told jurors the attack was swift and sudden. He said Matar bounded up a staircase to the stage and ran about 30 feet toward Rushdie. As the stabbing began, Rushdie and fellow speaker Henry Reese were so stunned that they initially remained seated.

    “Without hesitation this man holding his knife … forcefully and efficiently in its speed, plunged the knife into Mr. Rushdie over and over and over and over again,” Schmidt said, “stabbing, swinging, slicing into Mr. Rushdie’s head, his throat, his abdomen, his thigh” and a hand the author raised to protect himself.

    “It all happened so fast that even the person under attack, Mr. Rushdie, and the person sitting next to him, Mr. Reese, didn’t register what was happening,” Schmidt said.

    Rushdie eventually got up and ran away with Matar in pursuit and other people subdued the attacker, Schmidt said. Reese, co-founder of City of Asylum in Pittsburgh, suffered a gash above his eye.

    Matar, 27, of Fairview, New Jersey, is charged with attempted murder and assault. He has pleaded not guilty. He calmly said “Free Palestine” as he was led into the court Monday. During Schmidt’s statement, Matar looked on from the defense table, occasionally taking notes.

    “This is not a case of mistaken identity,” Schmidt said. “Mr. Matar is the person who attacked Mr. Rushdie without provocation.”

    The Indian-born British-American author detailed the attack and his long, painful recovery in a memoir, “Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder,” released last year.

    Rushdie had worried for his safety since his 1989 novel “The Satanic Verses” was denounced as blasphemous by many Muslims and led to Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issuing a fatwa calling for his death. Rushdie spent years in hiding, but had traveled freely over the past quarter century after Iran announced it would not enforce the decree.

    The trial is taking place as the 36th anniversary of the fatwa — Feb. 14, 1989 — approaches.

    Matar’s defense faced a challenging start after his public defender, Nathaniel Barone, was hospitalized with an undisclosed illness preventing him from attending the start of the trial. Judge David Foley refused a defense request to postpone opening statements, instead instructing an associate of Barone to speak in his place.

    Assistant public defender Lynn Schaffer told jurors that prosecutors would be unable to prove Matar’s guilt, even using video recordings and photos. She said the case is not as straightforward as the prosecution portrayed.

    “The elements of the crime are more than ‘something really bad happened’ — they’re more defined,” Shaffer said. “Something bad did happen, something very bad did happen, but the district attorney has to prove much more than that.”

    She acknowledged that nearly all the jurors admitted during jury selection that they had heard something about the case.

    “No matter what you knew coming in here, none of that information ever told you why and none of that information that you get from the district attorney is going to tell you why,” she said.

    The trial will last up to two weeks, the lawyers said.

    Matar told investigators he traveled by bus to Chautauqua, about 75 miles (120 kilometers) south of Buffalo. He is believed to have slept in the grounds of the arts and academic retreat the night before the attack.

    In a separate indictment, federal authorities allege Matar was motivated by a terrorist organization’s endorsement of a fatwa, or edict, calling for Rushdie’s death. A later trial on the federal charges — terrorism transcending national boundaries, providing material support to terrorists and attempting to provide material support to a terrorist organization — will be scheduled in U.S. District Court in Buffalo.

    Rushdie has been one of the world’s most celebrated authors since the 1981 publication of “Midnight’s Children,” winner of the Booker Prize. His other works include the novels “Shame” and “Victory City,” which he had completed shortly before the 2022 stabbing, and the 2012 memoir “Joseph Anton,” in which he wrote about his time in hiding.

    In the federal indictment, authorities allege Matar believed the edict was backed by the Lebanon-based militant group Hezbollah and endorsed in a 2006 speech by the group’s then-leader, Hassan Nasrallah.

  • Kanye West deletes X account after horrific three-day tweeting spree

    Kanye West deletes X account after horrific three-day tweeting spree

    As he signed off from the platform, which he referred to by its old name, Ye wrote: ‘I’m logging out of Twitter. I appreciate Elon for allowing me to vent.

    ‘It has been very cathartic to use the world as a sounding board. It was like an Ayahuasca trip.

    ‘Love all of you who gave me your energy and attention. To we connect again. Good afternoon and good night.’

    During the Super Bowl, Kanye took aim at Taylor Swift during Kendrick Lamar’s halftime performance.

    He wrote: ‘If its about the culture … why are we letting Taylor Swift be seen on TV singing a song about taking a black man down and accusing of things that can take a black man down for life.’

    At last weekend’s Grammy Awards, the 35-year-old pop star was seen dancing to Kendrick’s Not Like Us diss track aimed at Drake.

    During the halftime show, Kanye added: ‘Kendrick is being used by these white people and Jews and so am I.’

    He has sparked outrage for his posts over the last few days, with many wondering if the rapper could possibly be in his right mind.

    Kanye was previously banned from X from December 2022 until summer 2023 for similar disturbing messages.

    He spent hours uploading on his X account on Friday morning where he weight-shamed women, targeted the Jewish community, and expressed support for Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs, who is facing numerous sexual assault allegations.

    ‘I’m racist. Stereo types exist for a reason and they all be true,’ he said during his earlier rant on Friday morning.

    At one point, he posted: ‘I’m never apologising for my Jewish comments. I can say whatever the f**k I wanna say forever. Where’s my f*****g apology for freezing my accounts. S**k my d**k how’s that for an apology.’

    Friends actor David Schwimmer, 58, was among those to publicly call for the ‘deranged’ star to be banned from X before he stepped back of his own accord.

    Sharing a selection of Kanye’s comments on Instagram, he wrote: ‘This is so 2022. We can’t stop a deranged bigot from spewing hate filled, ignorant bile… but we CAN stop giving him a megaphone, Mr. Musk.

    ‘Kanye West has 32.7 million followers on your platform, X. That’s twice as many people than the number of Jews in existence. His sick hate speech results in REAL LIFE violence against Jews.(sic)’

    He expressed disgust that there hadn’t been ‘sufficient outrage’ over Kanye’s comments, and warned staying silent made people ‘complicit’ in the dangerous rants.

    He explained: ‘I don’t know what’s worse, the fact that he identifies as a Nazi (which implies he wants to exterminate ALL marginalized communities including his own) or the fact that there is not sufficient OUTRAGE to remove and ban him from all social media at this point. Silence is complicity. (sic)’

    Got a story?

    If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

  • Kendrick Lamar’s flare jeans were the other star of his Super Bowl halftime show

    Kendrick Lamar’s flare jeans were the other star of his Super Bowl halftime show

    Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl LIX electrifying halftime show came with an exciting fusion of music, cultural symbolism and…. his flare jeans.

    The Grammy Award-winning rapper performed wearing a custom leather Martine Rose Varsity jacket that read “Gloria” across the front, a black shirt, Nike Air DT Max ’96 sneakers and a pair of Celine Flared Surf Jeans in summer dazed wash denim.

    While Lamar’s entire look was hard to miss, his choice in denim really took center stage — leaving fans, social media and the internet rattled.

    Flare jeans first rose to prominence in the late 1960s and ’70s, becoming a symbol of the counterculture movement. Inspired by naval bell bottoms, the style was embraced by rock stars, free spirits and disco-goers alike, peaking in popularity alongside the rise of bohemian and glam aesthetics.

    After fading out in the ’80s and early ’90s, flare jeans made a strong comeback in the late 1990s and early 2000s, thanks to the growing influence of pop stars and early Y2K fashion trends.

    Celebrities such as Britney Spears, Destiny’s Child, and Jennifer Lopez regularly sported low-rise flares with crop tops and platform heels, making them a staple of the era’s effortlessly cool aesthetic.

    While skinny jeans eventually took over in the mid-2000s, flare jeans have continued to resurface in cycles, proving their timeless appeal — and now, with Lamar’s Super Bowl fashion flare moment, they may just be due for another major revival.

    Flare and bootcut jeans are similar, but they have distinct differences in shape and styling:

    Flare jeans: These have a dramatic widening from the knee down, creating a bold bell-bottom effect. The flare can range from subtle to extreme, with some styles nearly touching the floor in a wide swoop. Originally popular in the ’70s and revived in the early 2000s, flare jeans often make a statement and are great for elongating the legs.

    Bootcut jeans: These are more subtle than flare jeans, with a slight widening from the knee down, just enough to accommodate a pair of boots (hence the name). The cut is more balanced and versatile, making it a classic choice that works well with a variety of shoes.

    Essentially, all flares are wider than bootcut jeans, but not all bootcut jeans are flares. Flare jeans make a bold, retro-inspired statement, while bootcut jeans offer a more understated, everyday look.

    Lamar’s exact pair is available for a whopping $1300, but you can also shop lots of similar pairs from popular retailers including Madewell, Levi’s, Abercrombie & Fitch, Good American and more.

    Just below, check out some stylish options that you can shop right now.